Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

Weight Reduction on 92 Si?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 18, 2003 | 07:57 PM
  #1  
HarryB's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
From: Where All Funky Things Come From...., Stankonia, USA
Default Weight Reduction on 92 Si?

I know my Si is a pig.

How much does your Si weigh?
What weight reduction mods have you done?
Suggestion for mods?

Thanks

NO IM NOT GOING TO BUY A CX/DX/VX!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 08:05 PM
  #2  
Solo2Vtec's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,655
Likes: 0
From: Torrance, CA, USA
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (SimplyE)

Mine weighed 2180 with GSR motor
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 08:33 PM
  #3  
all stock's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 0
From: ho moon ah, USA
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (SimplyE)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SimplyE &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I
NO IM NOT GOING TO BUY A CX/DX/VX!!!!!!!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>

u'll be stripping a lot of tar then.

i'd do all the basics. carpet, tar, firewall mat, all panels including doors and roofliner.
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 09:09 AM
  #4  
HarryB's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
From: Where All Funky Things Come From...., Stankonia, USA
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (SimplyE)

ttt
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 09:13 AM
  #5  
Apex i ITR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,675
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada currently residing in ATL, GA, USA
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (SimplyE)

I like a comfortable car.....I don't want a tin box. This is my daily driver. Full interior (Spare included), carpet, all seats (Even baby seat).

2200 without my fat ***.
Reply
Old May 20, 2003 | 07:07 PM
  #6  
SikofFalln's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: Da Lou, MO, U.S.A.
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (Apex i ITR)

I have a 92 si also and I am in the process of gutting the pig. I have all the carpet out now and I'm getting some dry ice tommorow to remove the tar. Then I will put my carpet back in, just because I don't like having big spots with just primer on the floor.
Reply
Old May 20, 2003 | 08:20 PM
  #7  
HarryB's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
From: Where All Funky Things Come From...., Stankonia, USA
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (BseriesPWR)

about how much weight can I remove by getting rid of the tar? Is it worth it. What are some downfalls of doing it?
Reply
Old May 20, 2003 | 08:28 PM
  #8  
Db1 Supreme's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
From: santa clarita, ca, USA
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (HarryB)

is it true that the 92 si is the lightest out of the 92-95 hatches? cause i know the later models like the 95 si comes with rear speakers and a lot of other extra stuff
Reply
Old May 20, 2003 | 08:31 PM
  #9  
blykins's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Bird land, GA
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (A.C.)

I have a 94 Si hatchback and i feel your pain. I took my tar out, i didnt weigh it but it seemed to be abotu 25lbs Total. It looks like *** w/ the tar out, b/c my car is black, and under the tar is a light gray, so theres big gray spots from where the tar used to be. I put the carpet back in over it and i dont really notice a difference. I hate gutting my car, if i do it, its only at the track and it all goes back in as soon as i get home.
I plan on putting my car back to stock and gettting a CX, DX, VX so i can be faster. The Si has been fun and i will miss its creature comforts but i will love finally being light.
BTW--when i gutted my car, no backseats, no pass. seat, no spare. It weight 2430lbs WITHOUT me!! My car is one heavy ****!!
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 07:37 PM
  #10  
SIckH22Atch's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: Niagara Falls, ny, niagara
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (blykins)

wtf?!! that is nuts... 2430?!!

I have a 92 si/ h22a. it is 2260 with out me in it. I took out the spare and all seats except for the driver seat. I also had just over a 1/2 tank of gas. I did remove the a/c and p/s when I did the engine swap though.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 09:19 PM
  #11  
Noe Kozz's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,133
Likes: 0
From: NYC/JERZ
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (SIckH22Atch)

93 Si, no A/C, P/S, Power doors/windows, no back seats, gutted rear. I haven't gotten around to weighing her but she "feels" light.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 08:31 AM
  #12  
hybrid901's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, TN
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (Noe Kozz)

My SI weighted 2640 with me in it. I weight 210.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 08:52 AM
  #13  
Eee Pee's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Mid, Ohio
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (hybrid901)

You can always go overboard.
1850 w/o me, with a full tank. Two stock seats. D16z6
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 09:06 AM
  #14  
EARLdaSQUIRREL's Avatar
official honda whore
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,454
Likes: 0
From: not tellin you where, pa, usa
Default

im sorry but strippin an si of all its comforts and the tar etc is a waste, if you want to be light from the start get a cx or soemthing, why strip an si, there already rare enough to find let alone finding one that someone took the things out of it that make it an si
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #15  
Mr. Thunderlips's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,557
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (E)

I'd honestly ask you why you're doing this first...

If it's to be faster on the streets, then you're wasting your time and effort, not to mention trahsing your car.

If you are actually going to track this car, on an actual race track...Then get to work.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 10:52 AM
  #16  
hatchback's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 0
From: thief killer, USA
Default Re: (coptzer)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by coptzer &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">im sorry but strippin an si of all its comforts and the tar etc is a waste, if you want to be light from the start get a cx or soemthing, why strip an si, there already rare enough to find let alone finding one that someone took the things out of it that make it an si </TD></TR></TABLE>

well put. The most I am going to do for weight reduction is..

Lost my rear sub, spare, rear seats, ac.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 11:24 AM
  #17  
B.'s Avatar
B.
400 HP Club
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 0
From: Kills, Canada
Default Re: (hatchback)

I only took out the rear seats and carpet, left all the panels, it's still a good daily driving CX, plus No peeps in the back seat.


Modified by THE B at 10:05 PM 7/6/2003
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 11:42 AM
  #18  
SpoonFedHatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 2
From: houston, tx, usa
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (Eee Pee)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Eee Pee &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You can always go overboard.
1850 w/o me, with a full tank. Two stock seats. D16z6
</TD></TR></TABLE>

now that's true dedication.......i hope it's not your daily driver
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 01:37 PM
  #19  
built562's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
From: Nowhere Cali, Ca, USA
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (SpoonFedHatch)

i understand that the cx is lighter than an si but i thought that was just from the sunroof and power accesories, they are the same frame and chasis right, so if someone has an SI and they want to gut it why do people tell them to buy a cx?

i dont get it??
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 02:12 PM
  #20  
crucial si's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (akumaracer)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by akumaracer &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i understand that the cx is lighter than an si but i thought that was just from the sunroof and power accesories, they are the same frame and chasis right, so if someone has an SI and they want to gut it why do people tell them to buy a cx?

i dont get it??</TD></TR></TABLE>

Si chassis code is EH3..the rest are EH2..so different chassis to support the moonroof weight and not flex. we also have a bigger gas tank than cx,vx. there is alot of **** that is different..but 2400+ cars, damn...i dont think mine weighs that damn much.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 02:23 PM
  #21  
I Kick Squirrels's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,795
Likes: 0
From: south carolina
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (crucial si)

just save and gets some more mods, or go on a diet.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 02:29 PM
  #22  
B18C5-EH2's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 16,612
Likes: 55
From: Southside ATL, GA
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (E)

My old Si weighed 2289lbs. with full interior, GS-R front brakes, Type R engine/tranny swap, 15'' Rotas, and spare tire removed.

A/C, P/S, and cruise were also deleted too. All glass, steel stock hood, no sort of weight reduction except for what's listed.

Sorry, but I have hard time believing claims of under 2200lbs. with full interior. This was also the lighter 1992-1993 model with only one airbag.

Here you go:

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=150315

By the way, removing tar as a means of weight reduction is a waste of time.

You will save 10lbs. at most and go through hell and make the inside look like **** in the process unless you get it all repainted inside.

I'd look into first and foremost:

Carbon fiber hood
Lightweight battery (11.5lbs. vs. 31lbs.)
Real FAL lexan hatch glass (and remove the rear wiper motor combo)
Lighter wheels

Then if you're hardcore try removing:

Moonroof tracks and motor
Replace moonrof glass with c/f piece
Stereo and speakers
Firewall mat
A/C
P/S and do it right by swapping in a non-P/S rack
Windshiled washer fluid tank
Rear seats
Windshield wiper motor and arms

You could also remove the bumper supports, but I personally would not do this and I don't recommend it.

Remember though that what ever you do to an Si you can do to the CX/VX/DX and STILL be lighter.

We have a lot of topics about this already, so I'll probably end up locking this one down because it's been covered so many times before.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 02:51 PM
  #23  
EARLdaSQUIRREL's Avatar
official honda whore
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,454
Likes: 0
From: not tellin you where, pa, usa
Default

i just see no point in gettin an si and takin out p/s a/c, cruise etc unless the only reason your getting an si is for the moonroof ( why though if you want it light) or if you want a stock black hatch...

personally thats one of the main reasons i bought both of my si hatchs is that there black and i love the color and rareness of a black hatch
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 04:25 PM
  #24  
built562's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
From: Nowhere Cali, Ca, USA
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (crucial si)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by crucial si &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Si chassis code is EH3..the rest are EH2..so different chassis to support the moonroof weight and not flex. we also have a bigger gas tank than cx,vx. there is alot of **** that is different..but 2400+ cars, damn...i dont think mine weighs that damn much.</TD></TR></TABLE>

oh yeah, good point, i also forgot about the gas tank!
for you
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 04:31 PM
  #25  
SkyeC's Avatar
Boba Connoisseur
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,555
Likes: 1
From: USA
Default Re: Weight Reduction on 92 Si? (E)

Wow, back from the dead.

My 92 Si w/ a GSR swap weighs 2280 w/o me in it. That's fine for me... I'm not trying to be the fastest little ricer on the block; YMMV.

I like my moonroof and power steering is nice for autocrossing.

A/C was dead when I bought it, so I deleted it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:16 PM.