Tech / Misc Tech topics that don't seem to go elsewhere.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Performance parts for B20VTEC CRX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 08:22 AM
  #1  
CRXEE8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Denmark
Default Performance parts for B20VTEC CRX

Hi guys, I'm new to the board here.
I would like to know what header, cat-back system, intake manifold, TB, cams, clutch and flywheel would be the best on a B20VTEC motor. I live in Denmark, Europe where the B16A1 powered CRX EE8 was in produced in '90-'91, so I will be using a B16A1 cable tranny.

The setup I'm using is:
B20B3 block bored/horned to 85 mm.
IB Spec. Wiseco 12.0:1 pistons
Probe Rods with ARP bolts
Balanced B20B crankshaft
Hondata B16A Heatshield
ARP head studs
Stock B16A1 head
Injen CAI
B&M pres. reg.
PRS4 stand alone system (www.perfectpower.com)
B16A1 cable tranny

I was thinking about using a SMSP header, Skunk2 Mega flow cat-back system, Skunk2 intake manifold, 70 mm. STR TB, Skunk2 Stage 2 cams and valvetrain, CM Stage 4 clutch and flywheel. How does this look??
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 08:55 AM
  #2  
Mr.Saturn's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 2
From: Salem, OR, USA
Default Re: Performance parts for B20VTEC CRX (Torrous)

Sounds really good, you might have some objections from other members to the 70mm throttle body but not sure. I really don't know personally what size to go with on an all motor b20vtec
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 09:12 AM
  #3  
non-VTEC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 2
From: Toronto, Canada
Default Re: Performance parts for B20VTEC CRX (Mr.Saturn)

i think a 62-64mm T/B would be ideal for that setup.........70mm would be a little to large
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 01:17 PM
  #4  
Mr.Saturn's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 2
From: Salem, OR, USA
Default Re: Performance parts for B20VTEC CRX (non-VTEC)

if you go with a 70mm at least get it tapered to 66-68mm in the middle
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 01:47 AM
  #5  
CRXEE8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Denmark
Default

Thanks for the input.
What is the problem with using to big a TB?
Can I use the stock CRV clutch with a CM flywheel on a B16A1 cable tranny?
How much does the SMSP header cost and is there a good alternative for it in this setup?
Is there a better cat-system then the Skunk2 for the CRX and is 2.5" the best way to go?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 09:06 AM
  #6  
Mr.Saturn's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 2
From: Salem, OR, USA
Default Re: (Torrous)

1. Too big TB = less air velocity, think of it like this, a 64 mm tube with a certain amount of air in it, and a 70 mm tube with the same exact amount of air, being able to spread out more, the air in the 70 mm tube will move much more slowly through the larger tube then the smaller tube. Same reason you don't want a 3" full exhaust system on a stock honda motor, you need exhaust velocity (not backpressure like a number of people think).

2. Yes but get a CM clutch as well, clutch is in my top 5 things to upgrade.

3. Not sure

4. 2.5" is great, I've heard decent things about the Skunk2, thermal R&D makes some good lines too, just avoid the 3" unless you go turbo.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chickenbandit
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
9
Jan 25, 2012 07:38 AM
JDM809
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
3
Feb 10, 2010 10:25 PM
boosted k20
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
3
Sep 20, 2005 08:13 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:55 PM.