Loss of pedal pressure after changing pads.
I know I've read this before a million times, but I only found 2 topics when I searched and both had a brake line removal involved.
My friend and I were replacing his brake pads in his crx. I've done this plenty of times, never had to bleed the brakes. We get everything back on, but on the test drive the pedal sinks to the floor consistently, and we must pump the pedal to gain pressure. So we take the wheels back off and bleed the front brakes and it's still happening.
Should I bleed all 4? Are these the signs of a bad MC? If so, why would it go bad only after changing pads?
Thanks for being patient folks.
My friend and I were replacing his brake pads in his crx. I've done this plenty of times, never had to bleed the brakes. We get everything back on, but on the test drive the pedal sinks to the floor consistently, and we must pump the pedal to gain pressure. So we take the wheels back off and bleed the front brakes and it's still happening.
Should I bleed all 4? Are these the signs of a bad MC? If so, why would it go bad only after changing pads?
Thanks for being patient folks.
Hmm...maybe we'll try that tomorrow. The order is:
1. RR
2. FL
3. RL
4. FR
It's just a pita since we're using a floor jack and not a lift.
1. RR
2. FL
3. RL
4. FR
It's just a pita since we're using a floor jack and not a lift.
Trending Topics
it doesn't really matter *that* much the exact order, as long as you start with the end FURTHEST from the MC, and work your way around to the one closest to it.
So that would make it rear passenger side, rear driver side, front passenger side, front driver side. Like usdmrob said.
But you can't really screw it up if you start at the rears.
Edit: left out some words
[Modified by hot_EG, 9:20 PM 3/17/2003]
So that would make it rear passenger side, rear driver side, front passenger side, front driver side. Like usdmrob said.
But you can't really screw it up if you start at the rears.
Edit: left out some words
[Modified by hot_EG, 9:20 PM 3/17/2003]
well I dunno.
But a brake system, is a brake system, is a brake system.
When in doubt, you can ALWAYS rely on going from the furthest, to the closest. In that case, it would be rear passenger, rear driver, front passenger, front driver.
That's how I always do it...don't see any reason to do it differently.
But a brake system, is a brake system, is a brake system.
When in doubt, you can ALWAYS rely on going from the furthest, to the closest. In that case, it would be rear passenger, rear driver, front passenger, front driver.
That's how I always do it...don't see any reason to do it differently.
well I dunno.
But a brake system, is a brake system, is a brake system.
When in doubt, you can ALWAYS rely on going from the furthest, to the closest. In that case, it would be rear passenger, rear driver, front passenger, front driver.
That's how I always do it...don't see any reason to do it differently.
But a brake system, is a brake system, is a brake system.
When in doubt, you can ALWAYS rely on going from the furthest, to the closest. In that case, it would be rear passenger, rear driver, front passenger, front driver.
That's how I always do it...don't see any reason to do it differently.
My only comment to that would be to take into account that the brake system uses a proportioning valve. Which links the RR to FL and links the RL to FR. So you almost bleed them individually, this would seem to me to be the reason that the Helms lists it that way. You in a sense are bleeding 2 different systems.
i thought it was passenger rear,drivers rear, passenger front, drivers front. the other way that everybody else is talking about passenger rear, drivers front, drivers rear, passenger front i thought was only for cars with ABS. i thought otherwise you are supposed to follow the first way. but what do i know
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johnwohl
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
1
Jun 27, 2010 08:52 PM
ch0baca
Honda Accord & Crosstour (2003 - 2012)
6
Jul 28, 2009 01:59 AM
miataguy
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
4
Jan 26, 2003 11:25 AM






