2005 CRX !!!!!
Guest
Posts: n/a
--- http://www.angelfire.com/tx4/robspage/newcrx/index.html
anyone have any links to another 05 crx site?
Trending Topics
how many times do i have to tell you guys how much i hate this car... the kseries is crap and it would crapify an awsome name... The Crx is better off where it is...
anyways i would get one of those if they ever came out.
It would probably be in direct compition with the BMW Mini Cooper!
how many times do i have to tell you guys how much i hate this car... the kseries is crap and it would crapify an awsome name... The Crx is better off where it is...
Although, with the statement you just made, I'm sure I won't get anything but an unjustified answer.
I like it but before I would say I would buy it I would want to find out what model we would get over here and I would have to take her for a spin just to see how it is then if I liked it yeah I would buy one.
K series are not there little brothers in the B series. Comparing it to a D series is a joke, apples to oranges. The outputs for them is lower then alot of B series. Yes they have more torque but it a 2l compared to a 1.8/1.6 of course would have more torque compare the torque to a B20B/Z. H/P is a min the SI makes as much as a bone stock B16....The RSX-s is 200 hp but its a better designed motor it accually switches to a larger cam lobe unlike the SI which just open valves like V-TEC-E's. The SI 2.0 is a joke my Z6 stock motor has faster time slips to prove this.... my 0.02
Not to burst anybody's bubble, but that is an artist rendition of the RSX concept that
was published a few years ago. Somebody just added the "CRX" to the side.
Honda will not produce another CRX, plain and simple. There is no demand for this
type of vehicle in today's consumer driven world.
And to the guy who says he hates CRXs...you probably got yer *** spanked by one
and now are bitter.
The K series engines compared to D or B series engines is like comparing apples
to oranges...
My $0.02
j
was published a few years ago. Somebody just added the "CRX" to the side.
Honda will not produce another CRX, plain and simple. There is no demand for this
type of vehicle in today's consumer driven world.
And to the guy who says he hates CRXs...you probably got yer *** spanked by one
and now are bitter.
The K series engines compared to D or B series engines is like comparing apples
to oranges...
My $0.02
j
There have been rumors of a "new" CRX for years, I'll believe it when i see it. How about this??
yes I realize its a photoshop job of an insight but it is supposed to be based on a platform much like the insight. I hope Honda does right and doesn't screw it up. I like what Misubishi has done with the new EVO VIII, they built the car the way they wanted it and just simply BOLTED on the necessary supports to be legal in the US. Sorry, i'm getting off topic.....
Would I buy a new CRX? depends on what honda offers us. If they do the CRX the justice it deserves, count me in. If they make another insight and call it a crx, then they can kiss my *** and I won't buy a new car. Honda is losing its grip in the performance market with these new cars coming out. If Honda is to stay on top, we need the CRX and it needs to be bad ***.
[Modified by illdezignzls, 3:35 PM 2/26/2003]
yes I realize its a photoshop job of an insight but it is supposed to be based on a platform much like the insight. I hope Honda does right and doesn't screw it up. I like what Misubishi has done with the new EVO VIII, they built the car the way they wanted it and just simply BOLTED on the necessary supports to be legal in the US. Sorry, i'm getting off topic.....
Would I buy a new CRX? depends on what honda offers us. If they do the CRX the justice it deserves, count me in. If they make another insight and call it a crx, then they can kiss my *** and I won't buy a new car. Honda is losing its grip in the performance market with these new cars coming out. If Honda is to stay on top, we need the CRX and it needs to be bad ***.
[Modified by illdezignzls, 3:35 PM 2/26/2003]
K series are not there little brothers in the B series. Comparing it to a D series is a joke, apples to oranges. The outputs for them is lower then alot of B series. Yes they have more torque but it a 2l compared to a 1.8/1.6 of course would have more torque compare the torque to a B20B/Z. H/P is a min the SI makes as much as a bone stock B16....The RSX-s is 200 hp but its a better designed motor it accually switches to a larger cam lobe unlike the SI which just open valves like V-TEC-E's. The SI 2.0 is a joke my Z6 stock motor has faster time slips to prove this.... my 0.02
Show me a bone stock Z6 in the original chassis that can outrun a bone stock 02+ Si.
Honda seriously overbuilt the K series motor. Just wait...folks are going to find some serious power in those motors. There is nothing inherintely bad about them (unlike the D series with the funky rod length).
ok, the reason i dislike the K-series (this is like the 3rd time i have said this on here) is because of the i-vtec... with a cam gear that advances and retards all on its own it is very difficult to boost. I am a turbo fan that is why i like the B-series... When i said the K-series was crap, it was my personal opinion...
Not to burst anybody's bubble, but that is an artist rendition of the RSX concept that
was published a few years ago. Somebody just added the "CRX" to the side.
Honda will not produce another CRX, plain and simple. There is no demand for this
type of vehicle in today's consumer driven world.
And to the guy who says he hates CRXs...you probably got yer *** spanked by one
and now are bitter.
The K series engines compared to D or B series engines is like comparing apples
to oranges...
My $0.02
j
was published a few years ago. Somebody just added the "CRX" to the side.
Honda will not produce another CRX, plain and simple. There is no demand for this
type of vehicle in today's consumer driven world.
And to the guy who says he hates CRXs...you probably got yer *** spanked by one
and now are bitter.
The K series engines compared to D or B series engines is like comparing apples
to oranges...
My $0.02
j
besides, this is an EF forum... take that **** somewhere else...
[Modified by CRX Si, 5:18 PM 2/26/2003]
I'm wondering how many times this is going to be re-posted.
I think if they are going to make a new CRX they should just use the k20, although the rumored 1.6L motor that is going to be in it would surely be a k-series, I really don't see the need for honda to put money into the development of another k-series motor.
Not to mention, what person in their right mind would want a 1900lb car with a 1.6L versus the same car with a 2.0L motor?
I agree that there is a lot of untapped potential in the k-series, eventually we'll end up seeing k20's and k24's making 225hp and 250hp, respectively, both while making more torque than their b-series counterparts.
I think if they are going to make a new CRX they should just use the k20, although the rumored 1.6L motor that is going to be in it would surely be a k-series, I really don't see the need for honda to put money into the development of another k-series motor.
Not to mention, what person in their right mind would want a 1900lb car with a 1.6L versus the same car with a 2.0L motor?
I agree that there is a lot of untapped potential in the k-series, eventually we'll end up seeing k20's and k24's making 225hp and 250hp, respectively, both while making more torque than their b-series counterparts.
it looks ok i guess. I'd have to learn more about its production specs how it handled ect. I dont nessacarily like the looks of my rex, but I like the aftermarket for it and the interior. well sort of. Mostly i like the way it handles and its ability to haul *** when some $$ is sunk into it. To each thier own......
Blaze
Blaze
i'd like to see anyone take a gsr, or a 99-00 si, or any car that had a b16 or b18 in it stock, and have them run a high 13 with i/h/e and a chip on street tires
you are a ******* idiot if you think k's are pieces of ****.
i've seen 12's with nitrous on a an i/h/e rsx type s with nitrous that was otherwise stock, and very reliable (ran over 100 passes with n02)
[Modified by skud_dusty, 3:56 PM 2/26/2003]
you are a ******* idiot if you think k's are pieces of ****.
i've seen 12's with nitrous on a an i/h/e rsx type s with nitrous that was otherwise stock, and very reliable (ran over 100 passes with n02)
[Modified by skud_dusty, 3:56 PM 2/26/2003]
Riiight.
Show me a bone stock Z6 in the original chassis that can outrun a bone stock 02+ Si.
Honda seriously overbuilt the K series motor. Just wait...folks are going to find some serious power in those motors. There is nothing inherintely bad about them (unlike the D series with the funky rod length).
Show me a bone stock Z6 in the original chassis that can outrun a bone stock 02+ Si.
Honda seriously overbuilt the K series motor. Just wait...folks are going to find some serious power in those motors. There is nothing inherintely bad about them (unlike the D series with the funky rod length).
that was a nice photoshop job, if the car looked something like that it would be a great looking car - IMO those rims are WAY too big for that car
you did all that work but ruined it with some bling bling rims - 15's look good on all hondas
you did all that work but ruined it with some bling bling rims - 15's look good on all hondas



