Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 04:30 PM
  #1  
ActiveAero's Avatar
Thread Starter
Paragraph Alert
25 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,565
Likes: 2
From: Oil rig, middle of the ocean
Default B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter

Which do you guys recommend? The B&M requires some work (which I don't mind) and is cheaper. The AEM is ready to go but more. Is there anything at risk with going with the B&M?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 04:31 PM
  #2  
Reid's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Yokohama, Japan
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (ActiveAero)

I'd go with the B&M unit.

Install is very easy.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 04:45 PM
  #3  
DarthLuder's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 0
From: chicago, il, USA
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (Reid)

I'd go with the B&M unit.

Install is very easy.

Titanmotorsports have the gauge and fpr for 80shipped.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 05:04 PM
  #4  
PM-Performance's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 12,978
Likes: 1
From: Reading, PA, usa
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (ITR GURU)

B&M is a Fuel pressure riser, can only go to like 60 psi
AEM is a Fuel pressure regulator, you can rise and lower. can go to 175 psi if ever needed, can rebuild it if something goes bad internally, can adjust the pressure dial via different size orfices in the fpr .

I say AEM all the way , it is much more versatile and you know no matter how many times you change your sdet up , that will always be nough . . .actually more thna enough for whatever you throw at it .
If you PM me , ill see if I can do a nicer deal on the AEM unit


[Modified by itr206, 6:04 PM 2/16/2003]
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 05:19 PM
  #5  
vtec.dc2's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,112
Likes: 0
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (ActiveAero)

aem f.p.r. + b&m mech. fuel press. gauge
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 05:22 PM
  #6  
Tweakmeister's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,536
Likes: 1
From: Edgewater, MD / La Jolla, CA
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (ActiveAero)

b&m
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 05:30 PM
  #7  
sgT's Avatar
sgT
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 8,757
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (itr206)

B&M is a Fuel pressure riser, can only go to like 60 psi
AEM is a Fuel pressure regulator, you can rise and lower. can go to 175 psi if ever needed, can rebuild it if something goes bad internally, can adjust the pressure dial via different size orfices in the fpr .

I say AEM all the way , it is much more versatile and you know no matter how many times you change your sdet up , that will always be nough . . .actually more thna enough for whatever you throw at it .
If you PM me , ill see if I can do a nicer deal on the AEM unit


[Modified by itr206, 6:04 PM 2/16/2003]
Totally incorrect.

B&M is not limited to 65psi
I HIGHLY DOUBT you can get the aem to 175. The pump would shut down first.

the fact of the matter is, if you are going over 60 then then you need to upgrade your injectors.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 09:12 PM
  #8  
andrewasf77's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (sgT)

sgt, you agree that the b&m is a quality product and accomplishes all that the aem can?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 09:22 PM
  #9  
98cwitr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
From: US
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (andrewasf77)

i can get it for free...i just dont see the point in it unless you have some serious mods
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 11:51 PM
  #10  
Deluzional's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,448
Likes: 0
From: US
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (98cwitr)

Im for B&M all the way, cheap price for a good product...besides I dont want any hassles with the AEM O-rings which i often hear about
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 07:21 AM
  #11  
PM-Performance's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 12,978
Likes: 1
From: Reading, PA, usa
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (sgT)

actualy as per the paperwork from B&M yes they are to go to 60 or 65 psi . and from the paperworkl from AEM , yes they do go to 175, i havent excersided that yetm but i have had mine to almost 90 by accident. I didnt say it would odo it on a stock pump either, so please do not assume.
Put it this way I havent had any probs with my AEm and I have had 2 diff all motor set ups with it , 3 nitours set up s and now turbo , it has held up thru a beating becuase i have played with my fuel pressure alot.
Also think of this , when the B&M Craps out , you need to get a new regulator. Becuase you had to cut your stock regulator apart to make this one work , So I still got my stock regulator as back up . . . . On top of that , AEM will let you return anything almost uder any time frame becuase they stand behingd their products,
I never tried to return B&M Stuff, but not everyone is that nice in the indusrty

Like i sad make your choice, but i recommend AEm
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 08:52 AM
  #12  
rodrez.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,936
Likes: 0
From: King Tubbys studio, CA
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (ActiveAero)

My AEM unit wasn't consistent between dyno runs. Sold it, and bought a Vortech (same as B&M) and it's been perfect, consistent run after run. Go with the B&M.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 12:17 PM
  #13  
SergEK's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
From: South Bay, CA
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (rodrez)

My AEM unit wasn't consistent between dyno runs. Sold it, and bought a Vortech (same as B&M) and it's been perfect, consistent run after run. Go with the B&M.
I love my B&M...easy to install and adjust and cheap too

<----- Thinks 175psi is a little much....wonder what the idle is like
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 12:33 PM
  #14  
PM-Performance's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 12,978
Likes: 1
From: Reading, PA, usa
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (SergEK)

the reasoning behind me adding that is to show how sometihn like that cant be outgrown and you can use it on a street car and a race car, , and i mean a real racecar
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 12:40 PM
  #15  
SurferX's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
From: O.C., CA, USA
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (itr206)

What about the Vortech FPR? Same thing as AEM as far as I know but it only costs like $60.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 12:41 PM
  #16  
chad's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,232
Likes: 5
From: Browns Summit, NC, USA
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (vtec.dc2)

aem f.p.r. + b&m mech. fuel press. gauge
this is a good setup!! plus aem is more bling!!!!
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 12:47 PM
  #17  
TsunamiZC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,194
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx, USA
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (chad)

aem f.p.r. + b&m mech. fuel press. gauge

this is a good setup!! plus aem is more bling!!!!
who cares about bling ....they work nearly the same ...cept one costs alot less because its not backed by some fancy name ...
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 12:57 PM
  #18  
vtecvoodoo's Avatar
Future Texas Boy
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,064
Likes: 0
From: SoCal Redneck
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (tsunami_zc)

I have a brand new jr fpr for sake..75 bucks
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 12:59 PM
  #19  
Reid's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Yokohama, Japan
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (tsunami_zc)

who cares about bling ....they work nearly the same ...cept one costs alot less because its not backed by some fancy name ...
Which one is the fancy name?

B&M ownz AEM in terms of company size and product line.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 01:10 PM
  #20  
Dave-ROR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 11,209
Likes: 2
From: Tampa, FL
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (Reid)

B&M ownz AEM in terms of company size and product line.
I agree with that completely. maybe if you only read about hondas or something I could see the AEM name being the bigger one.. but in reality..
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 01:12 PM
  #21  
rodrez.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,936
Likes: 0
From: King Tubbys studio, CA
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (SurferX)

What about the Vortech FPR? Same thing as AEM as far as I know but it only costs like $60.
I have the Vortech, it's not a "stand alone" like the AEM, it's an "add on." Identical to the B&M.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 01:13 PM
  #22  
TsunamiZC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,194
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx, USA
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (FyrStarter)

AEM seems to be the bigger name in the import crowd ...
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 01:38 PM
  #23  
TypeR_126's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Concord, CA, USA
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (tsunami_zc)

I had both and prefered the AEM in terms ease of use. With the B&M the vacuum line is on the same fitting that you use to adjust the pressure making it kind of a hassle to set. The AEM has a seperate adjuster and port. Once set however they both performed about the same.

Mike
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 08:56 PM
  #24  
Black R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,949
Likes: 8
From: Atlantis
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (Reid)

SARD ownz j00 all (in BLING and in $).....
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 09:32 PM
  #25  
B00ST2nR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,465
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area
Default Re: B&M vs AEM FPR? stupid caps filter (Black R)

B&M
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:13 PM.