removing exhaust
its not me thats doing it.. a guy in my region runs this way and he always is in STS. i thought he should be in street prepared, not that i care hes runnin STS, i run FSP anyway.. so is it legal.plus he runs and doesnt work
not that im gonna taddle or anything.
not that im gonna taddle or anything.
i think it would be legal but not sure.
But another question would be would a straight pipe replacing the axleback make any more power. Since its just for auto-x i've considered trying to make my own just to put on for race days if it would help.
But another question would be would a straight pipe replacing the axleback make any more power. Since its just for auto-x i've considered trying to make my own just to put on for race days if it would help.
i think it would be legal but not sure.
But another question would be would a straight pipe replacing the axleback make any more power. Since its just for auto-x i've considered trying to make my own just to put on for race days if it would help.
But another question would be would a straight pipe replacing the axleback make any more power. Since its just for auto-x i've considered trying to make my own just to put on for race days if it would help.
and to keep this on topic, yes it is legal to remove the rear muffler section. HOWEVER, if the safety steward feels the car is too loud he can boot it, or if the exhaust terminates before the end of the passenger compartment it could be deemed illegal. if its that short, its hurting him anyway, so who cares. not to mention he's quite the *** for not working in a volunteer sport. in short, you won't see him at nats and if he doesn't work he probably isn't very serious about this sport anyhow and as such won't be the best driver on sunday.
nate-who loaths anyone who doesn't do their fair share
Trending Topics
New to the STS rules this year is:
"All STS vehicles must comply with the Federal 49-state safety and tailpipe emissions test requirements as a minimum."
I'n not sure what the 49-state rule includes but I would bet it requires the exhaust to quietly terminate behind the driver or something like that.
"All STS vehicles must comply with the Federal 49-state safety and tailpipe emissions test requirements as a minimum."
I'n not sure what the 49-state rule includes but I would bet it requires the exhaust to quietly terminate behind the driver or something like that.
New to the STS rules this year is:
"All STS vehicles must comply with the Federal 49-state safety and tailpipe emissions test requirements as a minimum."
I'n not sure what the 49-state rule includes but I would bet it requires the exhaust to quietly terminate behind the driver or something like that.
"All STS vehicles must comply with the Federal 49-state safety and tailpipe emissions test requirements as a minimum."
I'n not sure what the 49-state rule includes but I would bet it requires the exhaust to quietly terminate behind the driver or something like that.
due to the variations in emissions inspections, enforcement of a specific location of termination or a certain volume level is nearly impossible. realistically, the only proof one has that their car is 49-state legal is an inspection sticker. changing your exhaust just to get a sticker is very easy.
nate
realistically, the only proof one has that their car is 49-state legal is an inspection sticker.
not having a muffler does not exclude one from passing emissions. However the guy at the gas station will probably hate you bringing an un-muffled piece to echo through his garage area and make his ears bleed.
I wasn't thinking that you would fail smog but rather the safety inspection. Having hot exhaust gas exit while still under the car must be some sort of safety violation.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
*ctrlaltdel
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
3
Aug 3, 2009 12:39 PM



