Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack Road Racing / AUTOX, HPDE, Time Attack

removing exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2003 | 03:25 PM
  #1  
ZUL8R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
From: Btown, SC
Default removing exhaust

is it legal to remove the rear section on an Si,, and run STS?? just want to clarify something
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2003 | 03:43 PM
  #2  
Chris's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
From: Santa Rosa
Default Re: removing exhaust (shane Z)

I suggest against it..

The HOT gasses point DIRECTLY towards the lower control arm/Sway bar/shock mount bushings, and WILL MELT THEM

Trust me.. I know.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2003 | 06:13 PM
  #3  
ZUL8R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
From: Btown, SC
Default Re: removing exhaust (Chris)

its not me thats doing it.. a guy in my region runs this way and he always is in STS. i thought he should be in street prepared, not that i care hes runnin STS, i run FSP anyway.. so is it legal.plus he runs and doesnt work not that im gonna taddle or anything.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2003 | 06:18 PM
  #4  
ryan12321's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 0
Default Re: removing exhaust (shane Z)

i think it would be legal but not sure.

But another question would be would a straight pipe replacing the axleback make any more power. Since its just for auto-x i've considered trying to make my own just to put on for race days if it would help.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2003 | 06:29 PM
  #5  
solo-x's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,569
Likes: 0
From: MA
Default Re: removing exhaust (ryan12321)

i think it would be legal but not sure.

But another question would be would a straight pipe replacing the axleback make any more power. Since its just for auto-x i've considered trying to make my own just to put on for race days if it would help.
doubtful. sts doesn't allow enough engine mods to make a straight pipe necessary. in fact, i feel that you want the longest exhaust possible to enhance low end torque. i run a stock b-pipe (agian, for low end torque) with a generic 2" diameter axle back that is just a straight through. this setup feels stronger then just the stock b-pipe and no muffler, and way stronger then a straight pipe terminating 30" behind the cat. (not to mention a LOT quieter) of course, i have no actual dyno numbers so this is pure conjecture on my part.

and to keep this on topic, yes it is legal to remove the rear muffler section. HOWEVER, if the safety steward feels the car is too loud he can boot it, or if the exhaust terminates before the end of the passenger compartment it could be deemed illegal. if its that short, its hurting him anyway, so who cares. not to mention he's quite the *** for not working in a volunteer sport. in short, you won't see him at nats and if he doesn't work he probably isn't very serious about this sport anyhow and as such won't be the best driver on sunday.

nate-who loaths anyone who doesn't do their fair share
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2003 | 06:35 PM
  #6  
.RJ's Avatar
.RJ
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 30,826
Likes: 0
From: RIP Craig Jones
Default Re: removing exhaust (solo-x)

nate's right... exhaust is free from the cat back, even in stock class.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2003 | 06:44 PM
  #7  
ZUL8R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
From: Btown, SC
Default Re: removing exhaust (.RJ)

thanks for clearing that up guys.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 08:28 AM
  #8  
RineRacing's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA, USA
Default Re: removing exhaust (ZUL8R)

New to the STS rules this year is:

"All STS vehicles must comply with the Federal 49-state safety and tailpipe emissions test requirements as a minimum."

I'n not sure what the 49-state rule includes but I would bet it requires the exhaust to quietly terminate behind the driver or something like that.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 08:59 AM
  #9  
solo-x's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,569
Likes: 0
From: MA
Default Re: removing exhaust (Geratol)

New to the STS rules this year is:

"All STS vehicles must comply with the Federal 49-state safety and tailpipe emissions test requirements as a minimum."

I'n not sure what the 49-state rule includes but I would bet it requires the exhaust to quietly terminate behind the driver or something like that.
i'm pretty sure that was in the rules from the start. there have been many discussions on the st list concerning emissions requirements. the concensus is that the rule is intended to prevent removal or modification of emissions equipment, not restrict any exhaust type.

due to the variations in emissions inspections, enforcement of a specific location of termination or a certain volume level is nearly impossible. realistically, the only proof one has that their car is 49-state legal is an inspection sticker. changing your exhaust just to get a sticker is very easy.

nate
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 09:42 AM
  #10  
WRXRacer111's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
Default Re: removing exhaust (solo-x)

realistically, the only proof one has that their car is 49-state legal is an inspection sticker.
So what do you do if you come from a state that doesn't require inspections?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 09:46 AM
  #11  
RineRacing's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA, USA
Default Re: removing exhaust (WRXRacer111)

So what do you do if you come from a state that doesn't require inspections?
You make sure your STS/STX car is 49-state legal.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 10:52 AM
  #12  
.RJ's Avatar
.RJ
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 30,826
Likes: 0
From: RIP Craig Jones
Default Re: removing exhaust (Geratol)

not having a muffler does not exclude one from passing emissions. However the guy at the gas station will probably hate you bringing an un-muffled piece to echo through his garage area and make his ears bleed.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 10:59 AM
  #13  
RineRacing's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA, USA
Default Re: removing exhaust (.RJ)

I wasn't thinking that you would fail smog but rather the safety inspection. Having hot exhaust gas exit while still under the car must be some sort of safety violation.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 11:03 AM
  #14  
.RJ's Avatar
.RJ
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 30,826
Likes: 0
From: RIP Craig Jones
Default Re: removing exhaust (Geratol)

what about vipers and superformance/factory five cobras?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PandaEF9
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
9
Aug 12, 2013 02:49 PM
*ctrlaltdel
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
3
Aug 3, 2009 12:39 PM
Splatter85
Honda S2000
9
Oct 1, 2008 05:36 AM
t-town_ep
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
4
Jun 9, 2007 05:46 PM
ILcrxsi1
Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack
4
Aug 6, 2006 12:37 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:36 AM.