What kind of #'s should i expect to see on my GSR, DC 4-1 header, stock exhaust, AEM (short), Type R cams. On a DynoPack last night saw 162.5 hp with 112.5 ft. Does that look about right?

 

they pull high 140`s-low 150`s on a dynojet w/ simillar mods.

 

I heard DynoJet's didnt show REAL #'s , unlike a dynopack??

 

500 hp at 56,000 rpm

 

leave.

 

ive seen a bunch of gsr dynos recently try searching

anywhere from high 130s to low 150s

 

your torque sounds a bit low..hp is pretty much near that if u tuned the cams at all..stock exhaust might be killing your numbers.. but is 112 your torque peak? or not?

 

I got 160whp and 121lb/ft of torque on a b18c1 with i/e/h and a skunk manifold.

 

hot, humid day 141.2 with intake, victor x manifold, and exhaust

 

Btw, dynopack tend to be about 10 ponies higher.

 

I got 161whp/123 tq

cai intake
jg modded header
2.5 crushbent exhaust

 

Got that backwards. Dynojet is actually the power made at the contact patch of tires rather than at the wheel hubs like dynopack. So dynojet tend to be little lower and more of a tangible number to work with.

Jay Kim

 

Sounds like it's more accurate of real world performance then, because it measures what hits the street, which is really what counts.

 

hmm,
that is true. you hit the streets with the wheels

but its power no matter how you look at it. it just depends on where you wan to read it from? it could be xxx from the engine but who reads it there, or flywheel or wheels? depends on what you want the best or hightest number

 

i agree damn noob

 

I got 162.8 WHP with: 1994 GSR, DC 4-2-1 SS header, High Flow Carsound Cat, Tanabe Cat-back and Injen Short Ram Intake...

BTW on 17's

 

i got 163.5 and 113.6 tq
i/h/e skunk manifold...type r flywheel..tuned vafc...bbk 70 mm tb

 

Thanks for the info guys

 

actually, the dynopack will read lower #'s than a dynojet, usually in the 10-15% range. think about it, after you get those wheels/drums turning a bit, it doesn't take as much power to maintain their speed, therefore you may see some higher numbers produced. the dynopack takes all that crap out of the equation, no possible wheelspin or anything like that. dynopack is power to the wheels... which will not help much if you have bad tires...

BTW you may see slightly higher numbers if you have the abient temperature sensor in someone's pocket!!!! biatch!!!!

 

What numbers do u get with a turbo application runnin about 7 psi????

 

Torque = r * F = r * ma

r=distance of axis of rotation to mass center
m=mass of object
a=acceleration

Torque is force, T, in respect to distance, r. It has nothing to do with momentum of the wheel, as you claim. Dynojet works by measuring the force equal to torque displaced from the wheel, the force it needs to exert to halt the wheel's movement.

Jay Kim

 

169hp-125tq GS-R with dc type R header,iceman cai,skunk2 I.M.,racing medalion exahust,kenji ecu...no tuning at all!


[Modified by ArmyGreen EG, 3:29 AM 11/26/2002]

 

Compare your numbers to Shawn Hayes' also done on a DynoPak......do a search (I'm too lazy right now)....he has B18C1 w/JRSC......

EDIT - ok, so here is his thread...... Click me dammit!........170 hp, 118 tq

Steve


[Modified by stevecockrill, 3:35 AM 11/26/2002]

 

thats pretty lame for a JRSC

 

Well wait a min. B16b2b Does have a point, those drums(wheels) weigh like 5,000lbs, so once they start rolling, you wont see a Torque drop that you SHOULD see, because the weight of the drum will carry its speed, and not show actual #'s. Just my thought.