b20/b16head vs h22
i say if you are tighter on money, the b20 vtec is definately the way to go h22's get expensive, and all b series motors have millions of variables, so i would go with b20 if you know someone to do work, or can do it yourself. but i think that h22 would be faster, just because of the figure's, then you could always get a si or gsr tranny to go with the b20, the h series only have one tranny.
[Modified by BUCKO5, 6:26 AM 11/22/2002]
[Modified by BUCKO5, 6:26 AM 11/22/2002]
Trending Topics
its gonna be b20/b16 head........why would the compression ratio be too low? also would ls tranny be a bad idea?? i just want it cus it has longer gears but would it be able to hold the torque?
If you dropped both off a building at the same time the H22 should hit the ground first, so it's faster
[Modified by Rezon, 2:27 PM 11/22/2002]
[Modified by Rezon, 2:27 PM 11/22/2002]
Build a b20vtec right.........190whp
Drop in a h22.........175whp
slap together a b20vtec..........170whp
drop in a h22 with a CEL...............130whp
Becareful nOObs
its gonna be b20/b16 head........why would the compression ratio be too low? also would ls tranny be a bad idea?? i just want it cus it has longer gears but would it be able to hold the torque?
From my experiences the LS tranny is fine in a forced induction, but not necessarily the best plan with NA. On my B20 (no VTEC) I have a B16 LSD tranny, and for me, that is the best tranny ever created. I can stay well in the power band all the time. My only complaint is that on the highway, at 120 km/hr (65-75 mph) it's revving at 4200 rpm, and it seems to suck gas like a prostitute sucks...well..you know, but I wish there was a gear set for 5th gear somewhere in between what I have and the LS 5th gear. From what I have been told, using the LS 5th gear makes it seem like you are shifting from 1-2-3-4-6 and there is no 5th gear.
Clayton
Clayton
My brother had a B20Vtec (B17 head) in his wehicle with an LS Tranny for about a year then he sold it, never had problems. He said that the LS tranny was great because it allowed him to use the torque. Just my two bits
the B20 crank is too heavy vs. ls/vtec the ls engine has a better torque stroke and the Vtec head come on who can complain. the B20 vtec is a crap idea. It is highly dangerous to rev past 7G's with the vtec head and it is generally heavy with Crap for compression. you rev too high in the B20/Vtec you crank walk.
H22 wouldn't be a bad idea....
osakajdmmotors.com has that swap for 2900 and it comes with LSD!!!
220 hp drop in and go ....no expensive motor work...variables.....Honda Reliability!!
You cant build a better an all motor set up for the money with this much Torque & power and reliability
We have a H22 in a Civic CX Hatch with 50 shot
see pics @ http://www.tunedbylorange.com/shopcar.html
osakajdmmotors.com has that swap for 2900 and it comes with LSD!!!
220 hp drop in and go ....no expensive motor work...variables.....Honda Reliability!!
You cant build a better an all motor set up for the money with this much Torque & power and reliability
We have a H22 in a Civic CX Hatch with 50 shot
see pics @ http://www.tunedbylorange.com/shopcar.html
osakajdmmotors.com has that swap for 2900 and it comes with LSD!!!
220 hp drop in and go ....no expensive motor work...variables.....Honda Reliability!!
You cant build a better an all motor set up for the money with this much Torque & power and reliability
220 hp drop in and go ....no expensive motor work...variables.....Honda Reliability!!
You cant build a better an all motor set up for the money with this much Torque & power and reliability
If you dropped both off a building at the same time the H22 should hit the ground first, so it's faster
Man, go back to physics class. If all the conditions are the same, they should both hit the ground at the same exact time.
The only thing that would prevent that is their aerodynamics.
-Mr. Wizard
The bigest m with the CRVtec is the rod/stroke ratio, the lenghty rod's cause the engine to be somewhat unsafe. I've heard of people revving to 8k on the stock bottom end with no problem's at all, but if yu planning on trying to pass that benchmark, you better be doing it right! Somehow rebuilding you're bottom end. The LS tranny IMO is worthless to an all motor monser, unless you like just getting into 3rd gear as you cross the 1/4, if you plan on boosting, then LS is the best way to go. If spend the same amount of money on a B20 vtec and you were gonna spend on swapping the H22, youre B20 will walk all over the H22 in any way you look at it.
the B20 crank is too heavy vs. ls/vtec the ls engine has a better torque stroke and the Vtec head come on who can complain. the B20 vtec is a crap idea. It is highly dangerous to rev past 7G's with the vtec head and it is generally heavy with Crap for compression. you rev too high in the B20/Vtec you crank walk.
To answer your question a h22 would be your better bet, it's honda reliability.If you take a unbuilt cr-vtec and compare it to a stock h22 my guess is that the h22 would make more power and tourque, and would make a better drag car.....But if the cr-vtec was built properly with pistons, rods, balanced, good hardware and assembled by a capable person...IMO the cr-vtec would hand the h22 it's ***...
the B20 crank is too heavy vs. ls/vtec the ls engine has a better torque stroke and the Vtec head come on who can complain. the B20 vtec is a crap idea. It is highly dangerous to rev past 7G's with the vtec head and it is generally heavy with Crap for compression. you rev too high in the B20/Vtec you crank walk.
I will be the first to say that ya it is risky but most of the stuff that people say is bull. Everyone says that B20vtec is unreliable blah blah blah...never heard of one breaking yet, i know about quite a few.
I would suggest a B20Vtec, with pistions all because of drivability, h22 is way to heavy and if you ever want to do some solo runnig or anything the sucker will not turn into a corner unless you have serious money to put into suspension.
I would also suggest adding rods, it is safer but if you don't have the money that setup is a nice one..
good luck
the B20 crank is too heavy vs. ls/vtec the ls engine has a better torque stroke and the Vtec head come on who can complain. the B20 vtec is a crap idea. It is highly dangerous to rev past 7G's with the vtec head and it is generally heavy with Crap for compression. you rev too high in the B20/Vtec you crank walk.
this is a very unfair comparison...
And you people that have no clue, the h22 is NOT that much heavier. I can see the 'you can't turn' crap already.
Anyway, if you're going to go to the trouble of pistons, nice build etc against a STOCK h22...of COURSE the b20/vtec would be the obvious choice.
Why not compare equal builds of the two motors?
'which is better.....a built b18b with a drag 3 or a stock h22?'
And you people that have no clue, the h22 is NOT that much heavier. I can see the 'you can't turn' crap already.
Anyway, if you're going to go to the trouble of pistons, nice build etc against a STOCK h22...of COURSE the b20/vtec would be the obvious choice.
Why not compare equal builds of the two motors?
'which is better.....a built b18b with a drag 3 or a stock h22?'






