LS Vtec build: Use the LS or GSR crankshaft for 9000 rpm?
Hello everyone, I'm a bit confused on what steps to take for the bottom end. I would like to hit 9k rpm.
I'm running a b16 ITR head with the full supertech valve package and titanium retainers, skunk2 tuner 2 cams.
What I'm confused about is if the stock ls crankshaft can handle being daily driven and hit 9k often. If I were to use the stock ls crank, I'd use scat connecting rods, arp rod bolts, and p30 pistons meant for the ls crank. If I can't use that, should I do a similar setup but with the gsr crankshaft?
I'm running a b16 ITR head with the full supertech valve package and titanium retainers, skunk2 tuner 2 cams.
What I'm confused about is if the stock ls crankshaft can handle being daily driven and hit 9k often. If I were to use the stock ls crank, I'd use scat connecting rods, arp rod bolts, and p30 pistons meant for the ls crank. If I can't use that, should I do a similar setup but with the gsr crankshaft?
You don't do this for just the sake of 9,000rpms. If it doesn't make power close to that rpm level, then you stop at the rpm that it is able to make the best power band. Either crankshaft can do this if properly prepped and balanced with the rest of the engine, regardless of company rods being used
You don't do this for just the sake of 9,000rpms. If it doesn't make power close to that rpm level, then you stop at the rpm that it is able to make the best power band. Either crankshaft can do this if properly prepped and balanced with the rest of the engine, regardless of company rods being used
Shorter stroke slows piston speed... allowing for higher peak engine speeds. Since the B18C and B18B crankshafts have only slightly different strokes, there will not be a dramatic difference in peak RPM potential. As TheShodan stated, you do not have enough compression or camshaft to reach that RPM, so the crankshaft choice is immaterial. Remember that the higher you rev an engine, the faster parts wear out. It may be cool to rev an engine to 9K, but 8K is much better for long-term reliability. You have to decide which is more important: Higher revving or living longer.
Like I stated... Neither. Especially since you don't have supporting equipment and tuning to make revving that high a rational idea
JRCivic1 pretty much summed it up. Think of your purpose before just getting into trying to "rev high".
Shorter stroke slows piston speed... allowing for higher peak engine speeds. Since the B18C and B18B crankshafts have only slightly different strokes, there will not be a dramatic difference in peak RPM potential. As TheShodan stated, you do not have enough compression or camshaft to reach that RPM, so the crankshaft choice is immaterial. Remember that the higher you rev an engine, the faster parts wear out. It may be cool to rev an engine to 9K, but 8K is much better for long-term reliability. You have to decide which is more important: Higher revving or living longer. 

Trending Topics
I'm not trying to be ignorant I'm new and have no idea what steps to take for building this thing, I'm taking my time with it and trying to do extensive research. I don't have any help but yeah thanks for the responses I guess
well..you stated that you would like to "hit 9k rpm" with no reasoning.
find out what you would like to do with the car and what your goal is..then someone will be able to help you or point you in the right direction.
your statement just tells us your goal is to take the car to 9k (constantly)
and your question is what crankshaft is needed to do so.
any crankshaft is able to do so.
find out what you would like to do with the car and what your goal is..then someone will be able to help you or point you in the right direction.
your statement just tells us your goal is to take the car to 9k (constantly)
and your question is what crankshaft is needed to do so.
any crankshaft is able to do so.
It was answered. Just read it again.. :-)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dominicanvtec
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
1
Mar 9, 2005 11:19 AM








