B17A1 in STL
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: milford, nova scotia, canada
So after the SCCA runoffs this year a buddy and I started to look at the STL rules. We both race Honda's but the club we race with runs a bracket system for car class. So we started to compare our bracket with what is legal in STL. We have a few things done that wouldn't be legal in STL. 8inch wide rims, 95 sub-frame in a 99 civic and no restrictor. Outside that we would just be very under-prepared.
But we found one odd rule for Honda's. The B17A1 doesn't require a Restrictor? Same HP as a B16 and a tiny bit more torque. Is there something i am missing? I ran a B17 for a few years racing prior to the ITR motor we have now. it was a very strong little motor. This year We used it 1 weekend and a fresh B16 the next. Same B18 GSR cams in each, same ITR intake. The B16 had better track and weather but was slower.
So am i missing something? This is all for nothing as well. I cant afford to tow to the states to race, and i dont see any Canadian clubs bringing back the Canadian Runoffs. So more less just discussion.
But we found one odd rule for Honda's. The B17A1 doesn't require a Restrictor? Same HP as a B16 and a tiny bit more torque. Is there something i am missing? I ran a B17 for a few years racing prior to the ITR motor we have now. it was a very strong little motor. This year We used it 1 weekend and a fresh B16 the next. Same B18 GSR cams in each, same ITR intake. The B16 had better track and weather but was slower.
So am i missing something? This is all for nothing as well. I cant afford to tow to the states to race, and i dont see any Canadian clubs bringing back the Canadian Runoffs. So more less just discussion.
im a honda challenge guy so i havent taken a deep dive in to the stl rules...well i mean i tried to once but i gave up due to the complication lol
but yes, i believe i saw some discussion about this when the restrictor rules got dropped on the hondas. i think a lot of the issue is that it is pretty difficult to find a b17 these days imho, but i do believe it has now become the silver bullet.
but yes, i believe i saw some discussion about this when the restrictor rules got dropped on the hondas. i think a lot of the issue is that it is pretty difficult to find a b17 these days imho, but i do believe it has now become the silver bullet.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: milford, nova scotia, canada
Well atleast i am not totally Crazy... lol.
So everytime i find one for sale should I buy it up and sell it state side for many many pennies more? lol. We might actually go get one this weekend to replace the exploded one. lol.
So everytime i find one for sale should I buy it up and sell it state side for many many pennies more? lol. We might actually go get one this weekend to replace the exploded one. lol.
Trending Topics
There's also a letter out to the Competition Racing Board asking to remove the restrictor for the non-VTEC B18s to give them a better chance against the cars that produce more power from the factory. If that goes through there might be little between a well-prepared B18, B17, and B18C motored STL car: The non-VTEC B18 would be allowed to breathe better, the B17 car would get a lower minimum weight due to its lower displacement, and the B18C would run restricted with limited head porting.
The STL Table A is put together friggin' awful. I've sent a couple letters and not even gotten a "Thank your for your input." If you are one to read the rules AS THEY ARE and don't have the memo the SCCA issued on the Honda restrictors (MA 18-02) you'd be able to run the B18 GS-R engines (C1 and C3?) unrestricted in STL...
"Acura/Honda B18
(except C engine)"
Okay...doesn't fit there so...
"Acura/Honda B18C (JDM Type R), B18C5 (USDM Type R), B18C6 (UK and Euro Type R), B18C7 (Australia Type R)"
Well, I have a B18 but it's not JDM OR a Type R so I'd say I don't have to run a restrictor. Why can't/won't they just change it to "Acura/Honda B18C ALL VARIATIONS" or something?
"Acura/Honda B18
(except C engine)"
Okay...doesn't fit there so...
"Acura/Honda B18C (JDM Type R), B18C5 (USDM Type R), B18C6 (UK and Euro Type R), B18C7 (Australia Type R)"
Well, I have a B18 but it's not JDM OR a Type R so I'd say I don't have to run a restrictor. Why can't/won't they just change it to "Acura/Honda B18C ALL VARIATIONS" or something?
stl keeps the gsr neutered with the stock oem intake manifold anyway so the "r" stuff got restricted ( at least i think im reading it right?). this is exactly why i went to honda challenge!
im about to submit a rules proposal for H2 to allow the gsr to run type r cams at a 50 pound weight penalty. if that manages to get approved, you could do a gsr at 2400 pounds, gsr with r cams at 2450 or a type r motor at 2500....simple and pretty damn equal!
im about to submit a rules proposal for H2 to allow the gsr to run type r cams at a 50 pound weight penalty. if that manages to get approved, you could do a gsr at 2400 pounds, gsr with r cams at 2450 or a type r motor at 2500....simple and pretty damn equal!
stl keeps the gsr neutered with the stock oem intake manifold anyway so the "r" stuff got restricted ( at least i think im reading it right?). this is exactly why i went to honda challenge!
im about to submit a rules proposal for H2 to allow the gsr to run type r cams at a 50 pound weight penalty. if that manages to get approved, you could do a gsr at 2400 pounds, gsr with r cams at 2450 or a type r motor at 2500....simple and pretty damn equal!
im about to submit a rules proposal for H2 to allow the gsr to run type r cams at a 50 pound weight penalty. if that manages to get approved, you could do a gsr at 2400 pounds, gsr with r cams at 2450 or a type r motor at 2500....simple and pretty damn equal!
they should just cap everyone @ 200 whp and run watcha'brung
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NOPIMAN
Drag Racing
67
May 17, 2004 11:17 AM
tek_civic
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
12
Apr 21, 2004 08:21 PM
CRexDX
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
2
May 1, 2002 07:58 AM




