Honda Prelude All Model Preludes

2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 02:01 PM
  #1  
D15B_Turbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: hella norcal...
Default 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH

which car is faster?? i know for a fact that the celica is 500 pounds lighter than the prelude, but prelude has more power, torque and has vtec, celica has the 6-speed advantage.....
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 02:17 PM
  #2  
blacklude's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, MD, United States
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (RiCeOnMaiSoK)

A prelude should beat a celica assuming both have equal drivers. Also having vtec and a 6 -speed is not an advantage.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 02:17 PM
  #3  
prelude1897's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 0
From: DFW, USA
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (RiCeOnMaiSoK)

Prelude is faster...If the preludes lost to a celica, than the driver needes to sell the car and let someone with better skills have the car...Just cause it has 6 gears doesn't make the car better
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 02:36 PM
  #4  
EH2DX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (RiCeOnMaiSoK)

actually the celica GT-S is a bit faster than the SH.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 02:42 PM
  #5  
illusion's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
From: jersey
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (krrrrrrzyrebel)

the cars are close but i would bet my money on the GTS if there were a wager.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 02:43 PM
  #6  
EH2DX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (illusion)

the cars are close but i would bet my money on the GTS if there were a wager.
yup.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 02:43 PM
  #7  
armharm's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (krrrrrrzyrebel)

5th gens are slow... bring the GT-S up against a 4th gen vtec then we'll see who's talking..
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 02:48 PM
  #8  
NCSTIdriver's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, United States
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (krrrrrrzyrebel)

Don't be talking Trash about the 5th Gens! 13's aren't to slow.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 03:10 PM
  #9  
RAB's Avatar
RAB
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
From: Superior, CO
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (NCH22driver)

Can't ya'll discuss childish lil street drag wars in the Kills section.
Corey Help!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 04:15 PM
  #10  
el_Presidente's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, CA, USA
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (RiCeOnMaiSoK)

didn't toyota lower the fuel cutoff point on the gts in 01, or was it 02? that should make it just a tad bit easier for a prelude to beat the gts. all things being equal, the gts should be a hair faster. but that doesn't make it better, preludes are so much better than celicas.

and the gts actually has a more advanced variable valve timing system than the VTEC used in the prelude. more comparable to the rsx type s than the prelude really.


[Modified by el_Presidente, 1:16 AM 11/12/2002]
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 04:32 PM
  #11  
Boostless97Lude
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (el_Presidente)

HANDS DOWN... the Prelude would win..... i found my Prelude while checking out the Toyota lot for a new GT-S, i test drove the GT-S, and kinda liked how it felt and all, but then i drove the, soon to be my, Prelude, and that's what i bought, 2 days later.....

i raced my friend with a TRD Celica one, no, the TRD Celica isn't SCed, it's only got like 20 more ponys, but 2 days after he bought it, he raced me, i had I/H/E and he had a cold air intake, and the TRD exaust.... an i won... hte only time he caguht up to me was at over 125 mph, b/c he has another gear, but i was still ahead when we put on the breaks....
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 04:34 PM
  #12  
Boostless97Lude
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (armharm)

5th gens are slow... bring the GT-S up against a 4th gen vtec then we'll see who's talking..
hey armharm... i beat a TRD Celica one night that had bolt-ons.....
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 04:34 PM
  #13  
luderida's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Maryland, MD, USA
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (RiCeOnMaiSoK)

Honestly i believe that the GTS 6 speed will beat the SH lude. If u go read around couple cellicas rain high 14's stock and mid 14's with just an intake. Considering they have 180hp and 1?? TQ with 500lbs less and vvti engine, it should be fast, just my opinion
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 04:39 PM
  #14  
98DC2's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
From: Southern Hospitality, usa
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (RiCeOnMaiSoK)

prelude i've had a chance to drive both. you don't need 6 gears, espcially w/ out the torque of the lude.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 04:39 PM
  #15  
armharm's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (Boosted97Lude)

5th gens are slow... bring the GT-S up against a 4th gen vtec then we'll see who's talking..

hey armharm... i beat a TRD Celica one night that had bolt-ons.....
lmao.... dear god please let the taunting stop!!! LET IT STOP!!!!
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 04:56 PM
  #16  
DsITR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (armharm)

IMO prelude will own...I have driven both, the GTS VVTL-I or (whatever it is called) only feels like the powerband is 500rpms long....

I did race a GTS in my SH, I won by about 2 car lengths...w/only intake

But the race could come down to driver..it is still close to the lude.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 05:18 PM
  #17  
piotrush's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 1
From: Stamford, CT
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (el_Presidente)

and the gts actually has a more advanced variable valve timing system than the VTEC used in the prelude. more comparable to the rsx type s than the prelude really.
Where did you read this? VVTL-i does not have a cam phasing mechanism like
i-vtec has on the intake cam. VVTL-i is like vtec (only toyota is 10 years behind), meaning there are two separate cam profiles, one of which is used at either low or high rpms. i-vtec is like that on the exhaust cam, but on the intake cam there are multiple levels of lift. BMW's Valvetronic system is more like i-vtec but better because it has cam phasing on both intake and exhaust cams.


[Modified by piotrush, 9:21 PM 11/11/2002]
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 05:23 PM
  #18  
Boostless97Lude
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (piotrush)

BMW's Valvetronic system is more like i-vtec but better because it has cam phasing on both intake and exhaust cams.
i believe it's called VANOS, if i remember correctly, it was origianlly on the E30 M3, but i could be mistaken, i'm a little rusty since my subscription to "Roundel" ran out
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 05:28 PM
  #19  
Final Flash's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 901
Likes: 3
From: Richmond, VA
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (piotrush)

Sorry guys, but according to the last road test I saw, the stock Celica beat the stock SH (6.8 0-60 vs 7.2/3 for the SH). Main factor wasn't hp or gearing, it was weight! The SH weighs in at +3000 lbs stock vs under 2700 lbs for the GT-S. However, reportedly if they both add the same bolt-ons the Lude is screwed. I also heard about mid 14's with i/e.

And they changed the fuel cutoff on the GT-S for the 2002 model.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 05:31 PM
  #20  
Boostless97Lude
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (heihachi)

well, my rearview doesn't lie, and i was in my BASE model that supposedly has less HP at high rpms, against a TRD celica that has ~20 more hp than the GT-S
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 05:40 PM
  #21  
x James Bond x's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA, USA
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (Boosted97Lude)

HANDS DOWN... the Prelude would win..... i found my Prelude while checking out the Toyota lot for a new GT-S, i test drove the GT-S, and kinda liked how it felt and all, but then i drove the, soon to be my, Prelude, and that's what i bought, 2 days later.....

i raced my friend with a TRD Celica one, no, the TRD Celica isn't SCed, it's only got like 20 more ponys, but 2 days after he bought it, he raced me, i had I/H/E and he had a cold air intake, and the TRD exaust.... an i won... hte only time he caguht up to me was at over 125 mph, b/c he has another gear, but i was still ahead when we put on the breaks....

So since you beat one celica then hands down all preludes will win?

My X girfriend ran a 14.8 in her celica BONE STOCK, She has also laid down more then a few 5th gens. In the preludes defenses she has also lost to a few 5th gens. go over to newcelica.org there are people in there running 14.5's with nothing but an intake with time slips to prove it. The celica is aimed at the integra anyway not the prelude.

X VS X car on the internet


[Modified by EneMy X, 2:42 AM 11/12/2002]
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 05:47 PM
  #22  
piotrush's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 1
From: Stamford, CT
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (Boosted97Lude)

Valvetronic debuted on the new 7, but supposedly the system is so great, they want to use it on all their new models, new z4 might have it. I forgot where I read about the system but if I find it I'll go more in depth.

Also, your base model should have more hp that a SH because the atts results in a slightly higher drivetrain loss. Then again every car is different, my baseline pull on the SH was 161whp, and most SHs I've seen do ~155whp. I guess I have a factory freak.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 06:16 PM
  #23  
Boostless97Lude
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (piotrush)

ok, ok, i can't remmber the numbers, but supposedly,the base at ~6600 rpms produce 195 or 200 hp (depending on year), and the SH did the same at 6600 rpms, but at ~7700 rpms, it produces 215, and no number was given for the base model at 7700 rpms
i guess they were trying to compensate for drivetrain loss
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 06:28 PM
  #24  
D15B_Turbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: hella norcal...
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (Boosted97Lude)

a bone stock celica GT-S 6-speed runs 14.8?? im a lil' shaky on that, thats almost Integra Type R status 14.7
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2002 | 06:37 PM
  #25  
ELUD THS's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,126
Likes: 0
From: RICHMOND, VA, UNITED STATES
Default Re: 2001 Celica GT-S 6-Speed vs. 2001 Prelude Type SH (RiCeOnMaiSoK)

i dont have a sh but ill run a gts in my base anytime, and ill even turn downthe boost hehe
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:58 AM.