All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

86x92 B-Series

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 10:47 PM
  #1  
martin88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default 86x92 B-Series

Hey guys! Im planning to build a 86x92 motor. this will be the plan.


Head:

B18 ported head
Supertech big valves-flat valves
Supertech bronze valve guide
Skunk2 ultra street intake manifold
Skunk2 pro series valve springs
Skunk2 pro series retainers
Skunk2 pro3 cams
Blox 76mm throttlebody
ID 1000cc injectors

BLOCK:

B18 block golden eagle sleeved
BC stroker kit 92mm
CP 86mm 14compression pistons
Race bearings


Headers
SMSP copy

I will run this on pumpgas 100octane


I need your personal inputs and comments.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 10:58 PM
  #2  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 242
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

I'll be brief.. All that build stuff and you're going to put a monkey-assed blox TB on there.

I weep for the future..

And don't use that "I don't have a lot of money for this" excuse, either..
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2016 | 12:14 AM
  #3  
martin88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Was planning blox coz for the 76mm size. So skunk74mm is better?
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2016 | 06:05 AM
  #4  
martin88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Whats do you think will be a good header and a good throttle body for mu setup?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 05:10 AM
  #5  
martin88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Guy? Any more info/inputs you can share with me?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 07:33 PM
  #6  
93egSLEEPER's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,637
Likes: 4
From: Seahawks WA, USA
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

The ultra street manifold will hold this setup back. A motor this big needs air, aka plenum volume.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 10:51 PM
  #7  
martin88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Originally Posted by 93egSLEEPER
The ultra street manifold will hold this setup back. A motor this big needs air, aka plenum volume.
Thank you for the info. What manifold do you think will be best for my build?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2016 | 09:38 AM
  #8  
doood's Avatar
been there done that
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 11,885
Likes: 3
From: earth
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Ported skunk2 ultra or Itbs
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2016 | 08:30 PM
  #9  
ej1_civic's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Racing ultra, and skunk2 90mm tb
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2016 | 12:04 PM
  #10  
43!'s Avatar
43!
Honda-Tech Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 5
From: Illinois
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Do you have access to E85? Build sounds awesome, can't wait for results.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2016 | 04:38 PM
  #11  
martin88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Originally Posted by 43!
Do you have access to E85? Build sounds awesome, can't wait for results.
Thats the bad thing, we only have 100octane. No e85 on where i live.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2016 | 09:59 PM
  #12  
PyroProblem's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Sounds like a solid build!
Theres a few 92mm stroker engines being built around here, but none are completed yet (including my own). I haven't seen anyone on HT post up results lately of any 92mm engines either. A few years back, there were a few running around (chugger, pondus, team diesel, casey, fink to name a few), but theres not a ton of info on them from what ive seen.

If you stick with that Blox TB, might wanna Loctite the screws and/or stake them to keep them from coming loose. Really any aftermarket TB to be safe. Heard horror stories about screws coming loose and destroying engines before.

Good luck with the build! Keep us updated and post results when its all finished!

Oh, and check your rod to sleeve (bottom of sleeve) clearances. There's a good chance it will need touched up
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2016 | 10:57 PM
  #13  
martin88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Quick question, why do you think thise 92mm stroke engines have no feedback? Maybe someone you give a good answer? I also want to know why.

Im now planning to use a 90mm skunk throttle body and also insted of using a ultra street, i will be using a skunk ultra race.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2016 | 12:03 AM
  #14  
DC-2uned's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Now this is just my opinion but, I think there are so few 92mm builds because anyone going bigger than an OEM 89mm usually jump to either a 95 or 98mm. If you think about it, 99% of turbo cars run the OEM 77.4(B16A), 87.2(B18C) or 89(B18A/B) unless they're making 4-digit HP or just want to "be different", so you won't see much from them. As far as the all motor guys, since we start with such small displacement(sub-2.0L) motor, any gain in displacement possible within the constraints of our block is a plus.
This is why everyone jumps to the 95, 98 or even larger cranks, especially in a drag car builds where long-term reliability, bearing wear and rod/stroke ratio come second to HP numbers and ETs. Also remember a lot of these high HP B's are being built to keep up with K24's, which come stock at 87x99 with a head that flows like a ported B, so it's already an uphill battle with an 86x98 B(not to mention a lot of these K guys are actually 90x106 with 4piston heads, Bastards! lol jk).
I personally like the 92mm crank, I've always seen it as a great compromise between the 89 and 95. More displacement than the 89, and better geometry/less wear(plus better clearance) than the 95. If not abused daily, they tend to go longer between rebuilds than the 95's. I think they're ideal for a moderately driven(probably not daily) car that sees the strip/circuit from time to time. Don't plan to break any records with it but you'll def see/feel a nice bump in torque over the 89 and it's night and day coming from the 87.2mm.

I see you're really doing your research and making your rounds in the forum, so that's good. This place is a wealth of information and there's still a group of good guys to help guide you. Best of luck with the build, I'll be checking in to see more 92 results!
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2016 | 02:25 AM
  #15  
martin88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Originally Posted by DC-2uned
Now this is just my opinion but, I think there are so few 92mm builds because anyone going bigger than an OEM 89mm usually jump to either a 95 or 98mm. If you think about it, 99% of turbo cars run the OEM 77.4(B16A), 87.2(B18C) or 89(B18A/B) unless they're making 4-digit HP or just want to "be different", so you won't see much from them. As far as the all motor guys, since we start with such small displacement(sub-2.0L) motor, any gain in displacement possible within the constraints of our block is a plus.
This is why everyone jumps to the 95, 98 or even larger cranks, especially in a drag car builds where long-term reliability, bearing wear and rod/stroke ratio come second to HP numbers and ETs. Also remember a lot of these high HP B's are being built to keep up with K24's, which come stock at 87x99 with a head that flows like a ported B, so it's already an uphill battle with an 86x98 B(not to mention a lot of these K guys are actually 90x106 with 4piston heads, Bastards! lol jk).
I personally like the 92mm crank, I've always seen it as a great compromise between the 89 and 95. More displacement than the 89, and better geometry/less wear(plus better clearance) than the 95. If not abused daily, they tend to go longer between rebuilds than the 95's. I think they're ideal for a moderately driven(probably not daily) car that sees the strip/circuit from time to time. Don't plan to break any records with it but you'll def see/feel a nice bump in torque over the 89 and it's night and day coming from the 87.2mm.

I see you're really doing your research and making your rounds in the forum, so that's good. This place is a wealth of information and there's still a group of good guys to help guide you. Best of luck with the build, I'll be checking in to see more 92 results!

Thank you. Yes i wont be using this car for my daily driver. I plan to only use it like when i feel like using it. This wont be on a racecar but on my hatch on full interior, or should i say for a weekend car (even if i wont be using it every weekend)

What what do you guys now think about mu build? Before i move more forward i still would like to do more research since im not in a hurry for this. So i need more of your inputs. Also maybe you can help me with the combination of parts for me to use. Engine will be running on 100octane since no e85 available in mu place.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2016 | 04:17 PM
  #16  
martin88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Any more inputs you guys can share?
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2016 | 07:49 PM
  #17  
PyroProblem's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

You could probably get away with smaller injectors since your not using E85 and sticking with gas, If you wanted to save a few bucks.
But then again, a little extra grow room is always nice.

Id suggest a permanently installed wideband o2 sensor as well.
I have zero experience with oversized valves but with Pro 3 cams and a 14:1 domed piston, clearances might be really close and your camshaft adjustment range may be limited. Checking all clearances will be critical as with any engine build.

Id also look into some kind of harmonic damper (ATI/Fluidampr) over the stock crank pulley. More stroke = more weight moving at very high speeds = more engine harmonics (bad for engine parts).

Who's gonna be porting the head?

Overall, sounds like a solid build plan. If your using a b18 vtec block (didn't see it mentioned if it was a b18 A, B, or C block), you'll need to block off the oil squirters.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2016 | 11:55 AM
  #18  
PSI GUY's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
From: Riverview, NB, Canada
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

I have a set of ID725 with top hats and plugins that would be good for your build. Good for where you want to be and if you decide to try ethanol they are big enough as well.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2016 | 12:57 AM
  #19  
billvtec's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: france
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

you must keep standard size valves with pro3.
you can not degreeing properly cams with oversize valves.
already with standard size the overlap is very tight !
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2016 | 12:12 PM
  #20  
PyroProblem's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Originally Posted by billvtec
you must keep standard size valves with pro3.
you can not degreeing properly cams with oversize valves.
already with standard size the overlap is very tight !
Billvtec, Ive watched some of your vids on youtube before. Some nice builds you have sir!
Welcome to HT!
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2016 | 12:24 PM
  #21  
Tegra206's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: NW
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

in for OEM stock build
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2016 | 01:06 PM
  #22  
93egSLEEPER's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,637
Likes: 4
From: Seahawks WA, USA
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Originally Posted by Tegra206
in for OEM stock build
WUT?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2016 | 01:11 PM
  #23  
Tegra206's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: NW
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

LOL just kidding!!!! hahaha
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2016 | 12:30 AM
  #24  
billvtec's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: france
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

Originally Posted by PyroProblem
Billvtec, Ive watched some of your vids on youtube before. Some nice builds you have sir!
Welcome to HT!

thanks sir !
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2016 | 11:09 AM
  #25  
CHEETAH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,828
Likes: 1
From: Woodbridge, NJ, Middlesex
Default Re: 86x92 B-Series

I had a pretty decent experience with a 86x92 build about 15 years ago...even won a Wally with a 84.5x92 setup...Endyn did the magic for it where I was experimenting at every race and then would give feedback to Larry, send head back he'd slightly tweak and return, etc..
Not sure what the specs are on the crower stroker kit you're using but Larry and I used the his +137 crower long rod and his slipper skirt rollerwave pistons...his head was also magic.
He also kept telling me go with a small TB 64mm or even 72mm etc but I wouldn't listen...he was right you only need a small one...I used a 74mm with his AIR carbon fiber intake manifold, his ridiculous job on a GSR head and his bumpstix cams and I degreed to his specs, SMSP long narrow pipe header and the best we yielded on a dynojet 248C was 284whp which was whomp whomp for that time when the world was all running K-series in our class and we were the only B series.

I would imagine with all the new technology out there you'd be able to pull a good 15hp extra...like individual/COP, faster ECU (I used an old AEM V1 EMS lol), CNC head porting...all that stuff is new technology and can help you now, especially with the camshafts design, roller rockers (I used OWM modified rockers).

good luck with the build.

Greg
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:51 AM.