96 Accord EX Coupe Coefficient of Drag
Hello I have a 96 Honda Accord EX Coupe 2.2L, can any one explain how to do the formula, provide an answer and show documentation for proof (website). Thanks
You must be a fluid dynamics troll.
There is a tone of information about aerodynamics and how to calculate different drag coefficients online. If you are looking for specific calculations pertaining to the aerodynamics of the 96/CB Accord chassis, I think you've come to the wrong place. I don't think there are many H-T'ers putting their Accords into wind tunnels and quantifying aerodynamic numbers.
There is a tone of information about aerodynamics and how to calculate different drag coefficients online. If you are looking for specific calculations pertaining to the aerodynamics of the 96/CB Accord chassis, I think you've come to the wrong place. I don't think there are many H-T'ers putting their Accords into wind tunnels and quantifying aerodynamic numbers.
Lol right, earlier Taurus wasn't anything super appealing to look at either, but my old SHO was a fun sleeper. Exhaust, clutch, and a little machine work netted low 14s. And it handled fairly well. Back to the Accord COD. I believe the 99-up coupe was slightly better, but .34 sounds about right for the 98. If you don't mind me asking though, why do you care lol.
Trending Topics
It's an "educated guess" on the COD from the'98 being officially posted at .34(don't ask my how I remember this, 15+ years ago, I can't recall the conversation with a Honda engineer at an auto show), but he said it was BARELY more efficient than that previous year.
Mike, that's some of the funniest **** I've read in a long time. Kudos, amigo.
Mike, that's some of the funniest **** I've read in a long time. Kudos, amigo.
I was wondering cause I came across it and couldn't figure out the equation...
anyway good ole Wikipedia had some examples mine turned out to be around .33 maybe a little higher
anyway good ole Wikipedia had some examples mine turned out to be around .33 maybe a little higher
Hi Treyschls,
I found this forum post on Google while I was looking for the drag coefficient of your car. I can see that answers are from 0.34 to 0.36 so we can take into account the average value of 0.35.
I found this forum post on Google while I was looking for the drag coefficient of your car. I can see that answers are from 0.34 to 0.36 so we can take into account the average value of 0.35.
Goodness, you some of you guys don't even try...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_drag_coefficientFrog Taurus .30
92-96 Ascot Innova .32 (looks like a 90-93 with a 92-96 Prelude nose)
92-95 Civic Coupe .32 (probably the closest to shape of a CD Accord.)
02 Coupe .32
02 Sedan .33
03-07 Sedan .30
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_drag_coefficientFrog Taurus .30
92-96 Ascot Innova .32 (looks like a 90-93 with a 92-96 Prelude nose)
92-95 Civic Coupe .32 (probably the closest to shape of a CD Accord.)
02 Coupe .32
02 Sedan .33
03-07 Sedan .30
Goodness, you some of you guys don't even try...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_drag_coefficientFrog Taurus .30
92-96 Ascot Innova .32 (looks like a 90-93 with a 92-96 Prelude nose)
92-95 Civic Coupe .32 (probably the closest to shape of a CD Accord.)
02 Coupe .32
02 Sedan .33
03-07 Sedan .30

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_drag_coefficientFrog Taurus .30
92-96 Ascot Innova .32 (looks like a 90-93 with a 92-96 Prelude nose)
92-95 Civic Coupe .32 (probably the closest to shape of a CD Accord.)
02 Coupe .32
02 Sedan .33
03-07 Sedan .30

There is also the formula and data on a '94 EX towards the bottom. A little math should get you what you want. Also check with Eco-Modder forum, there may be some posted information there. There are a few aero guys there that would probably be better at giving you quantifiable data.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





