Header test: PLM 4-2-1 versus PLM 4-1 Megaphone, K24
Every now and then, we have clients that want to do back-to-back testing on certain parts. Last evening, we tested two PLM headers on a K24 Integra; the traditional 4-2-1 header versus the 4-1 megaphone collector counterpart.
The engine setup is as follows:
K24
87.5mm Wiseco 11:1 pistons
Molnar H-Beam rods
PRB oil pump
ARP head studs
CR-V PPA cylinder head (stock, unported, running in single lobe configuration)
SuperTech valve springs/retainers
Brian Crower Stage 2 camshafts (8620 billet)
Custom center-feed intake manifold w/90mm throttle
4" cold air intake
3" exhaust
ID1000 injectors
Tuned by Derek Robinson with Hondata K-Pro on E85
The dotted plot is the best baseline test with the existing PLM 4-2-1 header, which netted 276whp / 199wtq.
The solid plot is the final graph with the PLM 4-1 Megaphone header, which resulted in 282whp / 197wtq.
All testing was performed within two hours, both setups tuned to maximum power.

The 4-1 surprisingly picked up substantially down low (where torque is really lackluster on the single-lobe configuration), but lost some in the middle. No amount of cam timing changes could recoup the loss in the middle compared to the long-tube 4-2-1 of before.
I would also like to note that the cam angle and fuel table curves changed dramatically between the two headers. The first pull on the 4-1 Megaphone with the existing cam angle map resulted in a 40wtq deficit in the middle, until things were moved around.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
Thanks!
- Derek
The engine setup is as follows:
K24
87.5mm Wiseco 11:1 pistons
Molnar H-Beam rods
PRB oil pump
ARP head studs
CR-V PPA cylinder head (stock, unported, running in single lobe configuration)
SuperTech valve springs/retainers
Brian Crower Stage 2 camshafts (8620 billet)
Custom center-feed intake manifold w/90mm throttle
4" cold air intake
3" exhaust
ID1000 injectors
Tuned by Derek Robinson with Hondata K-Pro on E85
The dotted plot is the best baseline test with the existing PLM 4-2-1 header, which netted 276whp / 199wtq.
The solid plot is the final graph with the PLM 4-1 Megaphone header, which resulted in 282whp / 197wtq.
All testing was performed within two hours, both setups tuned to maximum power.

The 4-1 surprisingly picked up substantially down low (where torque is really lackluster on the single-lobe configuration), but lost some in the middle. No amount of cam timing changes could recoup the loss in the middle compared to the long-tube 4-2-1 of before.
I would also like to note that the cam angle and fuel table curves changed dramatically between the two headers. The first pull on the 4-1 Megaphone with the existing cam angle map resulted in a 40wtq deficit in the middle, until things were moved around.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
Thanks!
- Derek
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,828
Likes: 1
From: Woodbridge, NJ, Middlesex
very helpful dyno comparo - cudos to you guys for the test. amazing how it shows the old adage where there is the shift in power band between the two headers.
agree with slowsleeper, last time i saw or followed dereks stuff it was his dad's sick crx LOL ages ago
good stuff!
LOL @ 3,600 to 4,400
one day maybe 10yrs from now the 4-2-1 for better bottom end myth could be squashed LOL
good stuff!
LOL @ 3,600 to 4,400
one day maybe 10yrs from now the 4-2-1 for better bottom end myth could be squashed LOL
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SR20S13
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
341
Sep 1, 2011 06:32 AM
kaluwa3
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
7
May 13, 2007 04:58 AM
AllMotorITR
Acura Integra Type-R
34
Dec 5, 2001 05:13 AM



