Suspension & Brakes Theory, alignment, spring rates....

Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:31 PM
  #1  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

Going to do a review here on the front upper adjustable control arms made by skunk2.

These are the Pro Series Plus line, or the top of the line model.

Over all at first glance they look to be a solid product with free floating bushings which differentiates them from the other models in the line up.

Before I (to be frank) put them on blast. I have contacted them and notified them of the problems to which their response was "these problems do not warrant warranty claims." I got neither an apology or even a recognition of a problem. YOU DECIDE...

problems:

1. Gap between boot and stud that will allow dirt and water into joint. about 5/32nds of an inch.

2. Extremely weak looking boot with mold realease residue left all over the boot.

3. Barely any grease compared to an brand new OEM joint. I would estimate 1/10 the amount of grease the OEM Honda BJ would have
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:35 PM
  #2  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

The gap.
Attached Images   
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:37 PM
  #3  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

Weak boot with mold release residue and hardly enough grease.
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:45 PM
  #4  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

The solution, is oem ball joint boot which Skunk2 said would fit differently because its made for oem ball joint and not skunk2 ball joint, but wait Skunk2 your telling me the stud size and taper angle are different? I sure hope not or else this ball joint stud wont be fitting into the knuckle properly at all lol.
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:51 PM
  #5  
civexspeedy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 890
Likes: 2
From: MD
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

I would have returned them and gotten my money back to spend on HardRace... Skunk2 is a joke, esp after what has been happening.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:51 PM
  #6  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

Filled ball joint with oem outboard axle grease which seemed to be a dead nuts match to what was in there already.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:53 PM
  #7  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

They probably would have given me hell since they were opened package. I think ill be happy now that i fixed their problem.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 05:55 PM
  #8  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

Any one else with a review feel free...
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 08:51 PM
  #9  
94EG8's Avatar
Seagull Management
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,150
Likes: 26
From: Miramichi, NB, Canada
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

As much as I'm not overly impressed with Skunk2 as a business right now they probably make the best camber kit there is for '88 - '00 Civics. Hardrace? Really? Come on. Just the fact that you can adjust it from underneath makes it far superior IMO.

The ball joint boot does suck, and there probably should be more grease packed in there. But I think overall it's a pretty darn good camber kit and those 2 problems are easily fixed as long as you know about them. Skunk2 has a golden opportunity to make a good product even better by acknowledging and fixing both of these issues.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 02:21 AM
  #10  
Libertariat's Avatar
Ek Forever y0!
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 16,712
Likes: 9
From: Beating people with a stick, GA
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

What's wrong with hardrace?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 05:34 AM
  #11  
94EG8's Avatar
Seagull Management
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,150
Likes: 26
From: Miramichi, NB, Canada
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

Originally Posted by Libertariat
What's wrong with hardrace?
You can't adjust the ball joints from the bottom. Which means two things:

  1. You have slightly less travel before the arm starts to hit the shock tower because of the bolt heads (not a huge deal)
  2. It's easier to adjust the camber kit if you can do it from the bottom
Besides all that, the hardrace kit just looks cheap IMO. I'm not saying that it is, but looking at the two side by side you'll definitely get that opinion. It uses regular bolts from the top, with just washers, no plates or anything (unless I just happen to be looking at a really old version) regular washers distort really badly in a situation like that.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 05:40 AM
  #12  
Libertariat's Avatar
Ek Forever y0!
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 16,712
Likes: 9
From: Beating people with a stick, GA
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

On the bright side, AMR is about to start full-time production of camber kits for civics. They look amazing!!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 05:47 AM
  #13  
94EG8's Avatar
Seagull Management
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,150
Likes: 26
From: Miramichi, NB, Canada
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

Btw, I don't think I made this point clear above, but I was comparing SK2s pro series and pro series plus kits to hardrace. Their tuner series doesn't stack up as well (can't be adjusted from the top and IIRC it doesn't have the new style balljoints)
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 06:37 AM
  #14  
tron_'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

I heard lots of bad reviews about the Skunk2 camber kits so I opted to try the Buddy Club ones out.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 08:03 AM
  #15  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

Originally Posted by 94EG8
As much as I'm not overly impressed with Skunk2 as a business right now they probably make the best camber kit there is for '88 - '00 Civics. Hardrace? Really? Come on. Just the fact that you can adjust it from underneath makes it far superior IMO.

The ball joint boot does suck, and there probably should be more grease packed in there. But I think overall it's a pretty darn good camber kit and those 2 problems are easily fixed as long as you know about them. Skunk2 has a golden opportunity to make a good product even better by acknowledging and fixing both of these issues.
x2 Thanks, I def. dont hate the product.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 01:15 PM
  #16  
TunerN00b's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 5
From: Sherman Oaks, CA, United States
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

Originally Posted by 94EG8
As much as I'm not overly impressed with Skunk2 as a business right now they probably make the best camber kit there is for '88 - '00 Civics.
No love for SPC?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 01:38 PM
  #17  
Mashimaro's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

*I don't think my post actually submitted earlier!*

anyways, like i was saying, i've have used my Skunk2 front camber kit for a few years now.

i've gone through 6 ball joints in total so far as well (about 3 on each side). the last few ball joints i've bought were the 'pro-series' ones and also needed grease to be added before installing as there's not a lot in there when you get it.

i also had to shave off a few mm of material as well from the rear of the arm (where the bushing is) to clear my inner fenders. car is lowered to 1 finger gap.

i run them because they do work and do not seem to slip, but it sucks changing out ball joints every year (even though they're cheap) and getting an alignment again afterwards for my track days.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 01:51 PM
  #18  
94EG8's Avatar
Seagull Management
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,150
Likes: 26
From: Miramichi, NB, Canada
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

Originally Posted by TunerN00b
No love for SPC?
Never even thought of them. I have zero experience with them either.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 01:53 PM
  #19  
civexspeedy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 890
Likes: 2
From: MD
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

Originally Posted by TunerN00b
No love for SPC?
SPC is nice, didn't know they made a front camber kit for these cars. Looks like a real nice design from that picture.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2012 | 02:45 PM
  #20  
TunerN00b's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 5
From: Sherman Oaks, CA, United States
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plud Camber Review

Originally Posted by civexspeedy
SPC is nice, didn't know they made a front camber kit for these cars. Looks like a real nice design from that picture.
I have a set. In a box now because I wanted my full suspension travel back (see the sticky on camber kits for an explanation if needed). Forged aluminum instead of stamped steel.

They adjust caster (+-1.5*) as well as camber (+-3*). Seem fairly strong too, since I have dented shock towers and bent knuckles from slamming them into the shock towers and they show no sign of damage. They also held alignment hopping curbs at 120mph at Willow Springs.

Just remember to torque them to spec, which (if my memory serves) is 120 lbs-ft.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 07:34 PM
  #21  
ej6sir-t's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

SPC BJ single mounting location does not look very sturdy to me , any with extended service life with SPC upper arms?
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 05:18 AM
  #22  
94EG8's Avatar
Seagull Management
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,150
Likes: 26
From: Miramichi, NB, Canada
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

Originally Posted by ej6sir-t
SPC BJ single mounting location does not look very sturdy to me
Thats what I thought too when I saw it, but I didn't see any complaints about it when I checked them out either.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 10:05 AM
  #23  
TunerN00b's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 5
From: Sherman Oaks, CA, United States
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

Originally Posted by ej6sir-t
SPC BJ single mounting location does not look very sturdy to me
I would have thought so too, however...

Originally Posted by TunerN00b
They also held alignment hopping curbs at 120mph at Willow Springs.
That's my test of the holding power of, well, pretty much any part.

They didn't even slip on me when I went 4 off, sideways, at over 90 mph.

Probably because I did torque them to 120 lbs-ft. Had to borrow a torque wrench that even went that high.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2012 | 02:37 PM
  #24  
dllnzek's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 82
Likes: 1
From: new york
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

i never had a problem with my skunk2 camber kit..compared to other camber kits in the same price range these are without a doubt the best
Reply
Old May 10, 2012 | 07:05 AM
  #25  
nuggets's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: HC, WI
Default Re: Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review

I just had both ball joints go bad, and they've only been on my car a little over a year.. Seems many others are having the same problem. Sounds like they need to change something. I'm about to pick up another one today and I'm going to check the grease and boot, thanks for posting this up.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:32 AM.