Skunk2 516-05-5685 Pro Plus Camber Review
Going to do a review here on the front upper adjustable control arms made by skunk2.
These are the Pro Series Plus line, or the top of the line model.
Over all at first glance they look to be a solid product with free floating bushings which differentiates them from the other models in the line up.
Before I (to be frank) put them on blast. I have contacted them and notified them of the problems to which their response was "these problems do not warrant warranty claims." I got neither an apology or even a recognition of a problem. YOU DECIDE...
problems:
1. Gap between boot and stud that will allow dirt and water into joint. about 5/32nds of an inch.
2. Extremely weak looking boot with mold realease residue left all over the boot.
3. Barely any grease compared to an brand new OEM joint. I would estimate 1/10 the amount of grease the OEM Honda BJ would have
These are the Pro Series Plus line, or the top of the line model.
Over all at first glance they look to be a solid product with free floating bushings which differentiates them from the other models in the line up.
Before I (to be frank) put them on blast. I have contacted them and notified them of the problems to which their response was "these problems do not warrant warranty claims." I got neither an apology or even a recognition of a problem. YOU DECIDE...
problems:
1. Gap between boot and stud that will allow dirt and water into joint. about 5/32nds of an inch.
2. Extremely weak looking boot with mold realease residue left all over the boot.
3. Barely any grease compared to an brand new OEM joint. I would estimate 1/10 the amount of grease the OEM Honda BJ would have
The solution, is oem ball joint boot which Skunk2 said would fit differently because its made for oem ball joint and not skunk2 ball joint, but wait Skunk2 your telling me the stud size and taper angle are different? I sure hope not or else this ball joint stud wont be fitting into the knuckle properly at all lol.
Trending Topics
As much as I'm not overly impressed with Skunk2 as a business right now they probably make the best camber kit there is for '88 - '00 Civics. Hardrace? Really? Come on. Just the fact that you can adjust it from underneath makes it far superior IMO.
The ball joint boot does suck, and there probably should be more grease packed in there. But I think overall it's a pretty darn good camber kit and those 2 problems are easily fixed as long as you know about them. Skunk2 has a golden opportunity to make a good product even better by acknowledging and fixing both of these issues.
The ball joint boot does suck, and there probably should be more grease packed in there. But I think overall it's a pretty darn good camber kit and those 2 problems are easily fixed as long as you know about them. Skunk2 has a golden opportunity to make a good product even better by acknowledging and fixing both of these issues.
You can't adjust the ball joints from the bottom. Which means two things:
- You have slightly less travel before the arm starts to hit the shock tower because of the bolt heads (not a huge deal)
- It's easier to adjust the camber kit if you can do it from the bottom
Btw, I don't think I made this point clear above, but I was comparing SK2s pro series and pro series plus kits to hardrace. Their tuner series doesn't stack up as well (can't be adjusted from the top and IIRC it doesn't have the new style balljoints)
As much as I'm not overly impressed with Skunk2 as a business right now they probably make the best camber kit there is for '88 - '00 Civics. Hardrace? Really? Come on. Just the fact that you can adjust it from underneath makes it far superior IMO.
The ball joint boot does suck, and there probably should be more grease packed in there. But I think overall it's a pretty darn good camber kit and those 2 problems are easily fixed as long as you know about them. Skunk2 has a golden opportunity to make a good product even better by acknowledging and fixing both of these issues.
The ball joint boot does suck, and there probably should be more grease packed in there. But I think overall it's a pretty darn good camber kit and those 2 problems are easily fixed as long as you know about them. Skunk2 has a golden opportunity to make a good product even better by acknowledging and fixing both of these issues.
*I don't think my post actually submitted earlier!*
anyways, like i was saying, i've have used my Skunk2 front camber kit for a few years now.
i've gone through 6 ball joints in total so far as well (about 3 on each side). the last few ball joints i've bought were the 'pro-series' ones and also needed grease to be added before installing as there's not a lot in there when you get it.
i also had to shave off a few mm of material as well from the rear of the arm (where the bushing is) to clear my inner fenders. car is lowered to 1 finger gap.
i run them because they do work and do not seem to slip, but it sucks changing out ball joints every year (even though they're cheap) and getting an alignment again afterwards for my track days.
anyways, like i was saying, i've have used my Skunk2 front camber kit for a few years now.
i've gone through 6 ball joints in total so far as well (about 3 on each side). the last few ball joints i've bought were the 'pro-series' ones and also needed grease to be added before installing as there's not a lot in there when you get it.
i also had to shave off a few mm of material as well from the rear of the arm (where the bushing is) to clear my inner fenders. car is lowered to 1 finger gap.
i run them because they do work and do not seem to slip, but it sucks changing out ball joints every year (even though they're cheap) and getting an alignment again afterwards for my track days.
They adjust caster (+-1.5*) as well as camber (+-3*). Seem fairly strong too, since I have dented shock towers and bent knuckles from slamming them into the shock towers and they show no sign of damage. They also held alignment hopping curbs at 120mph at Willow Springs.
Just remember to torque them to spec, which (if my memory serves) is 120 lbs-ft.
I would have thought so too, however...
That's my test of the holding power of, well, pretty much any part.
They didn't even slip on me when I went 4 off, sideways, at over 90 mph.
Probably because I did torque them to 120 lbs-ft. Had to borrow a torque wrench that even went that high.
That's my test of the holding power of, well, pretty much any part.
They didn't even slip on me when I went 4 off, sideways, at over 90 mph.
Probably because I did torque them to 120 lbs-ft. Had to borrow a torque wrench that even went that high.
I just had both ball joints go bad, and they've only been on my car a little over a year.. Seems many others are having the same problem. Sounds like they need to change something. I'm about to pick up another one today and I'm going to check the grease and boot, thanks for posting this up.



