Drag Racing Drag Racing (legal) & Associated Topics

ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 03:29 PM
  #1  
xbladr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Lowell, MA, USA
Default ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up

Hey i have a 96 civic DX coupe. I used my friends Gtech a few nights ago and i ran a 17.79 it said. I dont know wtf is up that is an awful time. My freind said that i was prob pullin like 2.8 60 footers cuz my whells were hopping like crazy. What can i do to help the launch and is there anything else that may be wrong? please help that is alot slower than i had anticipated. My car has 16" enkeis on low pros It has msd distributor caps msd blaster coils. Iceman CAI, Thermal Stealth Cat Back Exhaust, and a b&m fpr, i have a wings west aggresor front bumper and two 12" subs in box in the trunk no rear seat and no spare tire plus another 200lb kid in the car.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 04:26 PM
  #2  
CD8's Avatar
CD8
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,711
Likes: 5
From: valley of sun, az, usa
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (xbladr)

sounds right about perfect
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 04:31 PM
  #3  
speedymon's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
From: US
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (xbladr)

Hey i have a 96 civic DX coupe...16" enkeis on low pros...and two 12" subs in box in the trunk no rear seat and no spare tire plus another 200lb kid in the car.
And why are you surprised about your time?
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 04:57 PM
  #4  
xbladr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Lowell, MA, USA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (xbladr)

i am surprised that it ran so shitty stock its supposed to run a 16.8 wtf is it one second slower with some mods also how should i launch? to get better 60 footers
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 07:06 PM
  #5  
ActiveAero's Avatar
Paragraph Alert
25 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,532
Likes: 2
From: Oil rig, middle of the ocean
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (xbladr)

Well since GTECH doesn't measure 60' your really going to have a hard time telling now aren't you?
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 07:37 PM
  #6  
Turbo200's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wi, U.S.A
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (xbladr)

Buy a new car!
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 01:58 AM
  #7  
SoulSurfer's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (Active (ActiveAero))

Well since GTECH doesn't measure 60' your really going to have a hard time telling now aren't you?
Plus...it's GTECH...it's not dead on accurate.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 07:07 AM
  #8  
wuhungsixxx's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 0
From: Communist State, CA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (LSDelSol)

i highly doubt you will break 17s with your dx...

....oh yea gtech can kiss my big ***...i hate that thing
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 01:01 PM
  #9  
slowman's Avatar
I took way too long
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,293
Likes: 3
From: FL
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (wuhungsixxx)

17.79? im glad i got me an Si! but maybe take the subs out and see if its better


[Modified by slowman EF, 4:02 PM 10/10/2002]
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 01:11 PM
  #10  
speedymon's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
From: US
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (slowman EF)

16.8 stock
+
0.2 for 200lbs passenger
0.3 for 16" wheels
0.1 for misc speakers and other bullshit
0.3 for 60' times
= ~17.7 1/4 mile times. Not a suprise to me.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 07:15 PM
  #11  
94allmotor4doorgsr's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: richmond, virginia, usa
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (speedymon)

15.9 87.74mph need to work on r/t and get better tires 94gsr4door
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 08:46 PM
  #12  
bretx0r's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,606
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (94allmotor4doorgsr)

take a ride in a fast car you'll realize how slow civics really are. when i took the turbo off, then put it back on it was like my car was reborn again.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 08:50 PM
  #13  
SoulSurfer's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (94allmotor4doorgsr)

15.9 87.74mph need to work on r/t and get better tires 94gsr4door
Reaction time has nothing to do with 1/4 time. It's your 60ft you need to be looking at.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 09:20 PM
  #14  
krazn's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: killadelphia, PA, FBGDD
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (LSDelSol)

take it to a real track..u should do fine
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2002 | 11:21 PM
  #15  
MikeMAN's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
From: Burlington, WI, USA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (slowman EF)

wowza!!! how did you get those times out of a DX?

j/k...but yea, i wouldn't be too stunned considering all the crap you had in a car that has as better chance of dyno'ing more torque than hp

Reply
Old Oct 12, 2002 | 07:57 AM
  #16  
google's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
From: aspirated, na, usz
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (bretx0r)

take a ride in a fast car you'll realize how slow civics really are. when i took the turbo off, then put it back on it was like my car was reborn again.
Man you are so ******* right. I have built 22 in hatch and i occasionally take my friends stock d16 man its like your hammering the pedal to get the shitiest response. It soo wack. Im telling you if you want some real power. Get a motor. b20 h22a b18s are alwys nice tooo b16 are garbage
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2002 | 12:22 PM
  #17  
Turbo C1's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, VA, USA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (94allmotor4doorgsr)

94allmotor4dr: yopu rana 15.9 with that setup? damn...that sux.
you should be runnig way better times than that!
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2002 | 12:25 PM
  #18  
Turbo C1's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, VA, USA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (Turbo C1)

dude....why are you trying to race a DX civic coupe with a STOCK motor...you'll never see good times with your car with that motor.
go GS-R or H22...**** even a b18b would be better than stock...
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2002 | 04:57 PM
  #19  
A-dub5513's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: CA, USA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (xbladr)

wow i would have tought that the wings west aggresor front bumper would have put you into the 12s
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2002 | 08:53 PM
  #20  
MikeMAN's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
From: Burlington, WI, USA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (A-dub5513)

wow i would have tought that the wings west aggresor front bumper would have put you into the 12s
lol
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2002 | 10:03 PM
  #21  
ForeignPolicy's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Valdosta, Ga, USA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (MikeMAN)

get Nitrous, a 40 shot leave your timing at stock, get a fuel filter and a good oil change, replace the plugs run some premium and enjoy the ride, I keep up with a gsr swap, but it wont last forever,
or find a vtec head and do the mini me!
it will kick you in the seat of your pamts!
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 01:57 PM
  #22  
MikeMAN's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
From: Burlington, WI, USA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (ForeignPolicy)

im not sure that either will "kick"you in your pants..

but I would say NO2 would pretty much be ur only viable option to do it cheaply. Otherwise u'll spend TONS on boltons just to keep up with stock EX's, maybe MAYBE si coupes depending on how many boltons u have.

mike
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2002 | 08:36 AM
  #23  
2camsaam's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (MikeMAN)

Non modified DX, ton of weight, slow times... What's the real question??
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2002 | 09:15 AM
  #24  
MikeMAN's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
From: Burlington, WI, USA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (2CAMSAAM)

Non modified DX, ton of weight, slow times... What's the real question??
lol
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2002 | 03:21 PM
  #25  
xbladr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Lowell, MA, USA
Default Re: ran 17.79 in the 1/4 wats up (A-dub5513)

hey adub why do u say **** like that whats the point? did i once mention that since i got a front bumper i should be faster or whatever. I by no means am at all like that i dont have any stickers on my car nothing like that. Also yes i believe in looks and system before performance and if some of you disagree thats fine it doesnt bother me its my personal choice. I was just lookin for some advice thanks.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:29 AM.