Noob Questions About Suspension Setup
Okay, so let's say I'm gonna get a Koni/GC setup, because someday, a long time from now, I will. 
I have a '93 CX with a D16Z6 swap. So let's say I order a set of 430/380 for a DD that makes the odd run through some twisty, hilly back roads and maybe a couple track runs someday. My understanding is that it's hard to make a spring that's exactly 430 ft-lb, so I might wind up with a spring that's actually 435 instead or whatever. So does that mean my other front shock might be 426 instead? If so, should I put the stiffer springs on the driver's side when installing?
Once I have them installed, I'm not entirely sure how to set them up. My understanding is that the springs are all some fixed length, and any ride hight adjustment comes from adjusting the coilovers? I've heard talk of 6" and 8" springs. Do the 6" just drop you two inches, or are they front springs, or what? I haven't seen any place that lets you choose the size, just the spring rate, so what's the deal there?
So here's what I'm thinking for getting them set up. Tell me where I'm going wrong and why. lol
Once I have them installed, crank the ride height all the way up, put zip ties on the bottom of the shock rods, and then get it aligned. (I'm thinking 0.03º out for the front, and 0.04º in for the rear.) Drive it around for a month or so, flying over railroad crossings and such, and see how high the zip ties have climbed up the shock rods. Crank the suspension down to within a comfortable margin of that, and get it realigned. This process should give me the lowest possible ride height without (reasonable) fear of bottoming out, right?
When adjusting ride height, I want to measure from the ground to a point on the car, right? Does it matter what point I choose, or can I measure from anywhere, as long as I'm consistent? Am I correct in thinking that by cranking the ride height down, you increase the amount of weight being supported by that corner? So if I want to shift the weight balance towards the rear, I could lower the rears and/or raise the fronts?
Once I have everything set up, if I do decide to go to a track day sometime, can I just crank everything down another inch and hit the alignment shop on the way to the track?

I have a '93 CX with a D16Z6 swap. So let's say I order a set of 430/380 for a DD that makes the odd run through some twisty, hilly back roads and maybe a couple track runs someday. My understanding is that it's hard to make a spring that's exactly 430 ft-lb, so I might wind up with a spring that's actually 435 instead or whatever. So does that mean my other front shock might be 426 instead? If so, should I put the stiffer springs on the driver's side when installing?
Once I have them installed, I'm not entirely sure how to set them up. My understanding is that the springs are all some fixed length, and any ride hight adjustment comes from adjusting the coilovers? I've heard talk of 6" and 8" springs. Do the 6" just drop you two inches, or are they front springs, or what? I haven't seen any place that lets you choose the size, just the spring rate, so what's the deal there?
So here's what I'm thinking for getting them set up. Tell me where I'm going wrong and why. lol
Once I have them installed, crank the ride height all the way up, put zip ties on the bottom of the shock rods, and then get it aligned. (I'm thinking 0.03º out for the front, and 0.04º in for the rear.) Drive it around for a month or so, flying over railroad crossings and such, and see how high the zip ties have climbed up the shock rods. Crank the suspension down to within a comfortable margin of that, and get it realigned. This process should give me the lowest possible ride height without (reasonable) fear of bottoming out, right?
When adjusting ride height, I want to measure from the ground to a point on the car, right? Does it matter what point I choose, or can I measure from anywhere, as long as I'm consistent? Am I correct in thinking that by cranking the ride height down, you increase the amount of weight being supported by that corner? So if I want to shift the weight balance towards the rear, I could lower the rears and/or raise the fronts?
Once I have everything set up, if I do decide to go to a track day sometime, can I just crank everything down another inch and hit the alignment shop on the way to the track?
omg. You are so mixed up it isn't even funny.
Read some more. A lot more.
https://www.google.com/search?q=how+...w=1691&bih=846
Read some more. A lot more.
https://www.google.com/search?q=how+...w=1691&bih=846
Okay, so let's say I'm gonna get a Koni/GC setup, because someday, a long time from now, I will. 
I have a '93 CX with a D16Z6 swap. So let's say I order a set of 430/380 for a DD that makes the odd run through some twisty, hilly back roads and maybe a couple track runs someday. My understanding is that it's hard to make a spring that's exactly 430 ft-lb, so I might wind up with a spring that's actually 435 instead or whatever. So does that mean my other front shock might be 426 instead? If so, should I put the stiffer springs on the driver's side when installing?
You could order 430's, and get 450's. But, it's 20lb's, i really really highly dobt you will notice a difference. Could it actually be a 435lb spring? Sure, but there is only one way to tell. Dude, it's 9lb's! You wont know which spring is on which side.
Once I have them installed, I'm not entirely sure how to set them up. My understanding is that the springs are all some fixed length, and any ride hight adjustment comes from adjusting the coilovers? I've heard talk of 6" and 8" springs. Do the 6" just drop you two inches, or are they front springs, or what? I haven't seen any place that lets you choose the size, just the spring rate, so what's the deal there?
No, not all springs are the same length. it's quite normal to get 8'' front and 7'' rear springs, which it doesn't really matter. You could put 7'' front, and 8'' rear if you wanted to. If the spring is 2'' shorter, yes, unless you adjust the collar for the new spring it will drop you 2 more inches. For a street car, I don't see how length matters that much. For a track car? Sure.
You may be able to ask the company for a custom length spring, but, it's not a huge deal. I run 8'' in front, and 7'' in rear.
So here's what I'm thinking for getting them set up. Tell me where I'm going wrong and why. lol
Once I have them installed, crank the ride height all the way up, put zip ties on the bottom of the shock rods, and then get it aligned. (I'm thinking 0.03º out for the front, and 0.04º in for the rear.) Drive it around for a month or so, flying over railroad crossings and such, and see how high the zip ties have climbed up the shock rods. Crank the suspension down to within a comfortable margin of that, and get it realigned. This process should give me the lowest possible ride height without (reasonable) fear of bottoming out, right?
That is such as a waste of time, and effort, it's retarded. I don't even know what that would do. Koni/gc will put you in the dirt if you please, however, you need some serous spring rates to support that. 500lb+ You can also put extended top hats in front, to help a little. Really, you would have to be offly low to do bottom them, unless you have low spring rates. IMO your at a higher risk and smashing the UCA's agasint the shock towers.
When adjusting ride height, I want to measure from the ground to a point on the car, right? Does it matter what point I choose, or can I measure from anywhere, as long as I'm consistent? Am I correct in thinking that by cranking the ride height down, you increase the amount of weight being supported by that corner? So if I want to shift the weight balance towards the rear, I could lower the rears and/or raise the fronts?
You can measure really where ever you want to, as long as keep the same point around the car. The easist place is from the middle of the wheel, to the lip of the fender. Or, the ground to the jack points.
Once I have everything set up, if I do decide to go to a track day sometime, can I just crank everything down another inch and hit the alignment shop on the way to the track?

I have a '93 CX with a D16Z6 swap. So let's say I order a set of 430/380 for a DD that makes the odd run through some twisty, hilly back roads and maybe a couple track runs someday. My understanding is that it's hard to make a spring that's exactly 430 ft-lb, so I might wind up with a spring that's actually 435 instead or whatever. So does that mean my other front shock might be 426 instead? If so, should I put the stiffer springs on the driver's side when installing?
You could order 430's, and get 450's. But, it's 20lb's, i really really highly dobt you will notice a difference. Could it actually be a 435lb spring? Sure, but there is only one way to tell. Dude, it's 9lb's! You wont know which spring is on which side.
Once I have them installed, I'm not entirely sure how to set them up. My understanding is that the springs are all some fixed length, and any ride hight adjustment comes from adjusting the coilovers? I've heard talk of 6" and 8" springs. Do the 6" just drop you two inches, or are they front springs, or what? I haven't seen any place that lets you choose the size, just the spring rate, so what's the deal there?
No, not all springs are the same length. it's quite normal to get 8'' front and 7'' rear springs, which it doesn't really matter. You could put 7'' front, and 8'' rear if you wanted to. If the spring is 2'' shorter, yes, unless you adjust the collar for the new spring it will drop you 2 more inches. For a street car, I don't see how length matters that much. For a track car? Sure.
You may be able to ask the company for a custom length spring, but, it's not a huge deal. I run 8'' in front, and 7'' in rear.
So here's what I'm thinking for getting them set up. Tell me where I'm going wrong and why. lol
Once I have them installed, crank the ride height all the way up, put zip ties on the bottom of the shock rods, and then get it aligned. (I'm thinking 0.03º out for the front, and 0.04º in for the rear.) Drive it around for a month or so, flying over railroad crossings and such, and see how high the zip ties have climbed up the shock rods. Crank the suspension down to within a comfortable margin of that, and get it realigned. This process should give me the lowest possible ride height without (reasonable) fear of bottoming out, right?
That is such as a waste of time, and effort, it's retarded. I don't even know what that would do. Koni/gc will put you in the dirt if you please, however, you need some serous spring rates to support that. 500lb+ You can also put extended top hats in front, to help a little. Really, you would have to be offly low to do bottom them, unless you have low spring rates. IMO your at a higher risk and smashing the UCA's agasint the shock towers.
When adjusting ride height, I want to measure from the ground to a point on the car, right? Does it matter what point I choose, or can I measure from anywhere, as long as I'm consistent? Am I correct in thinking that by cranking the ride height down, you increase the amount of weight being supported by that corner? So if I want to shift the weight balance towards the rear, I could lower the rears and/or raise the fronts?
You can measure really where ever you want to, as long as keep the same point around the car. The easist place is from the middle of the wheel, to the lip of the fender. Or, the ground to the jack points.
Once I have everything set up, if I do decide to go to a track day sometime, can I just crank everything down another inch and hit the alignment shop on the way to the track?
Really, you need to do a lot more homework. Your taking a very simple task and makeing it difficult.
No, not all springs are the same length. it's quite normal to get 8'' front and 7'' rear springs, which it doesn't really matter.
That is such as a waste of time, and effort, it's retarded. I don't even know what that would do.
Koni/gc will put you in the dirt if you please, however, you need some serous spring rates to support that. 500lb+
I chose those spring rates because they're a good bit stiffer than stock, increasing performance, without sacrificing too much ride comfort. If other rates would better accomplish this, then by all means, speak up. As far as ride height goes, I know that lower is generally better insofar as it lowers the center of gravity, which is good, but it also puts a cap on useful suspension travel, which is bad. I want minimum ride height given maximum travel, right? On a smoother surface, such as a track, I can run a lower ride height, since I likely won't need as much travel, right?
IMO your at a higher risk and smashing the UCA's agasint the shock towers.
You can measure really where ever you want to, as long as keep the same point around the car. The easist place is from the middle of the wheel, to the lip of the fender. Or, the ground to the jack points.
Oh, I'd read that the coils were stamped with their spring rate, and I assumed they'd be stamped with the actual spring rate, not the target rate. So if I order a pair of 430s, I might get a 450 and a 422, and they'd both be stamped 430? What margin of error does Eibach allow when matching springs?
Efficient? Hardly. You're just over complicating ****. The same as everyone else. Pick a ride height. Set the car down and if you don't like where it's sitting jack the car back and up and adjust until you get it.
I chose those spring rates because they're a good bit stiffer than stock, increasing performance, without sacrificing too much ride comfort. If other rates would better accomplish this, then by all means, speak up. As far as ride height goes, I know that lower is generally better insofar as it lowers the center of gravity, which is good, but it also puts a cap on useful suspension travel, which is bad. I want minimum ride height given maximum travel, right? On a smoother surface, such as a track, I can run a lower ride height, since I likely won't need as much travel, right?
Looks like you want to be spoonfed everything. This will make your road to choosing a suspension muy dificil. In the time you're sitting there dreaming about your future suspension maybe you should be on this suspension forum reading every single post on it.
That's entirely possible.
Are OTS springs typically longer or shorter than stock springs?
That strikes me as rather inefficient, not to mention putting the cart before the horse. The goal isn't to figure out how to make the car perform acceptably at a given ride height. The goal is to determine the ride height that gives optimum performance.
It seemed like my method would give me the ability to track the maximum travel required given my spring rates, and with a single adjustment, set the ride height to the minimum required to retain that amount of travel. Your method seems to be more along the lines of, "I guess I'll go -3 and see how that looks. Oops, I bottomed out the car; I guess I'll go -2.75. Oops; maybe -2.25. Hey, I haven't bottomed out in a while; maybe I should go to -2.5. Oops. I guess I need higher spring rates."
My method seems far more efficient, in fact, but I didn't know if I was missing something important.
I thought I explained that.
Okay, now I see what step you were trying to save me; determining the proper height, as you've already determined it for my car. Thanks! <3
I am having a little trouble with unit conversion though. How many inches per low and how many lows are in a super?
You don't think dropping the ride height by an inch for a day would require a realignment? How much would it affect toe?
Umm, yeah. You've mentioned that already.
No. I've ridden OEM shocks mostly, which I find to be a bit soft. I currently have these on the front, and I think they're ****. Of course, they were slapped on there by the kid that had it before me. I'm considering going back to the OEM springs, but I also realize that it still has OEM shocks on it. Hell, for all I know, it could have the original shocks.
Now that my car is "roadworthy," I'm getting to the point where I feel like if I'm going to replace something, I'm going to replace it with "the right part," so that got me to thinking about shocks, springs, and setup thereof.
Form follows function.
No, I was looking for some helpful input. Perhaps something like, "Hey, travel will increase a bit as ride height decreases, so give yourself a good margin when lowering," or maybe, "I can pretty much guarantee you're good to an inch and a half, and the OTS springs take off an inch anyway, so go ahead and crank it down a half when you start."
They are called "off the shelf" springs. They are usually 7" but that is based on vehicle application. Call Eibach if you want something different or just want to chat.
Efficient? Hardly. You're just over complicating ****. The same as everyone else. Pick a ride height. Set the car down and if you don't like where it's sitting jack the car back and up and adjust until you get it.
It seemed like my method would give me the ability to track the maximum travel required given my spring rates, and with a single adjustment, set the ride height to the minimum required to retain that amount of travel. Your method seems to be more along the lines of, "I guess I'll go -3 and see how that looks. Oops, I bottomed out the car; I guess I'll go -2.75. Oops; maybe -2.25. Hey, I haven't bottomed out in a while; maybe I should go to -2.5. Oops. I guess I need higher spring rates."
My method seems far more efficient, in fact, but I didn't know if I was missing something important.
So why are you sweating the ride height issues?
If you're not going "super low" then you have nothing to worry about whether on the track or on the street.
I am having a little trouble with unit conversion though. How many inches per low and how many lows are in a super?
Do you actually plan on getting two alignments every time you go to the track and back?
Sounds retarded to me.
And have you ever ridden on those rates? You may be in for a shocker if you buy them and find out they are way to harsh.
Now that my car is "roadworthy," I'm getting to the point where I feel like if I'm going to replace something, I'm going to replace it with "the right part," so that got me to thinking about shocks, springs, and setup thereof.
Pick a height and leave it. Period.
Looks like you want to be spoonfed everything.
Are OTS springs typically longer or shorter than stock springs?
That strikes me as rather inefficient, not to mention putting the cart before the horse. The goal isn't to figure out how to make the car perform acceptably at a given ride height. The goal is to determine the ride height that gives optimum performance.
It seemed like my method would give me the ability to track the maximum travel required given my spring rates, and with a single adjustment, set the ride height to the minimum required to retain that amount of travel. Your method seems to be more along the lines of, "I guess I'll go -3 and see how that looks. Oops, I bottomed out the car; I guess I'll go -2.75. Oops; maybe -2.25. Hey, I haven't bottomed out in a while; maybe I should go to -2.5. Oops. I guess I need higher spring rates."
My method seems far more efficient, in fact, but I didn't know if I was missing something important.
I thought I explained that.
Okay, now I see what step you were trying to save me; determining the proper height, as you've already determined it for my car. Thanks! <3
I am having a little trouble with unit conversion though. How many inches per low and how many lows are in a super?
You don't think dropping the ride height by an inch for a day would require a realignment? How much would it affect toe?
Umm, yeah. You've mentioned that already.
No. I've ridden OEM shocks mostly, which I find to be a bit soft. I currently have these on the front, and I think they're ****. Of course, they were slapped on there by the kid that had it before me. I'm considering going back to the OEM springs, but I also realize that it still has OEM shocks on it. Hell, for all I know, it could have the original shocks.
Now that my car is "roadworthy," I'm getting to the point where I feel like if I'm going to replace something, I'm going to replace it with "the right part," so that got me to thinking about shocks, springs, and setup thereof.
Form follows function.
No, I was looking for some helpful input. Perhaps something like, "Hey, travel will increase a bit as ride height decreases, so give yourself a good margin when lowering," or maybe, "I can pretty much guarantee you're good to an inch and a half, and the OTS springs take off an inch anyway, so go ahead and crank it down a half when you start."
I really hope your a female, if not don't heart us again.
Trending Topics
That's entirely possible.
Are OTS springs typically longer or shorter than stock springs?
Quite a bit shorter. ALL coilover springs should be consideribly shorter then stock springs. This is how they lower the car.
That strikes me as rather inefficient, not to mention putting the cart before the horse. The goal isn't to figure out how to make the car perform acceptably at a given ride height. The goal is to determine the ride height that gives optimum performance.
It's a waste of time. I mean,really, a zip on the shock piston to see how it goes up? BS.
The typical drop for guys wanting fucntion is about 2.5''. About enough to leave a 1-2 finger gap.
It seemed like my method would give me the ability to track the maximum travel required given my spring rates, and with a single adjustment, set the ride height to the minimum required to retain that amount of travel. Your method seems to be more along the lines of, "I guess I'll go -3 and see how that looks. Oops, I bottomed out the car; I guess I'll go -2.75. Oops; maybe -2.25. Hey, I haven't bottomed out in a while; maybe I should go to -2.5. Oops. I guess I need higher spring rates."
How are you going to track the travel needed? It's going to change. More, weight, larger bump, etc. You can put your **** on the ground and not bottom the shocks out, with very high spring rates. My car is lowered about 2.5'' and i just tore my lip off last night, normally, i don't have any problems with my ride height. I am able to get where I want to go, and be fine. but, my alley has ****ing bolders in it.
My method seems far more efficient, in fact, but I didn't know if I was missing something important.
Really seems like a waste of time.
I thought I explained that.
Okay, now I see what step you were trying to save me; determining the proper height, as you've already determined it for my car. Thanks! <3
I am having a little trouble with unit conversion though. How many inches per low and how many lows are in a super?
What are you saying? How many inches per low? how many lows are in a super? WTF is that?
General length of coilovers for these cars 8'' front and 7'' rear, which is what I have, and is completly fine.
You don't think dropping the ride height by an inch for a day would require a realignment? How much would it affect toe?
Umm, yeah. You've mentioned that already.
No. I've ridden OEM shocks mostly, which I find to be a bit soft. I currently have these on the front, and I think they're ****. Of course, they were slapped on there by the kid that had it before me. I'm considering going back to the OEM springs, but I also realize that it still has OEM shocks on it. Hell, for all I know, it could have the original shocks.
Now that my car is "roadworthy," I'm getting to the point where I feel like if I'm going to replace something, I'm going to replace it with "the right part," so that got me to thinking about shocks, springs, and setup thereof.
Form follows function.
No, I was looking for some helpful input. Perhaps something like, "Hey, travel will increase a bit as ride height decreases, so give yourself a good margin when lowering," or maybe, "I can pretty much guarantee you're good to an inch and a half, and the OTS springs take off an inch anyway, so go ahead and crank it down a half when you start."
Are OTS springs typically longer or shorter than stock springs?
Quite a bit shorter. ALL coilover springs should be consideribly shorter then stock springs. This is how they lower the car.
That strikes me as rather inefficient, not to mention putting the cart before the horse. The goal isn't to figure out how to make the car perform acceptably at a given ride height. The goal is to determine the ride height that gives optimum performance.
It's a waste of time. I mean,really, a zip on the shock piston to see how it goes up? BS.
The typical drop for guys wanting fucntion is about 2.5''. About enough to leave a 1-2 finger gap.
It seemed like my method would give me the ability to track the maximum travel required given my spring rates, and with a single adjustment, set the ride height to the minimum required to retain that amount of travel. Your method seems to be more along the lines of, "I guess I'll go -3 and see how that looks. Oops, I bottomed out the car; I guess I'll go -2.75. Oops; maybe -2.25. Hey, I haven't bottomed out in a while; maybe I should go to -2.5. Oops. I guess I need higher spring rates."
How are you going to track the travel needed? It's going to change. More, weight, larger bump, etc. You can put your **** on the ground and not bottom the shocks out, with very high spring rates. My car is lowered about 2.5'' and i just tore my lip off last night, normally, i don't have any problems with my ride height. I am able to get where I want to go, and be fine. but, my alley has ****ing bolders in it.
My method seems far more efficient, in fact, but I didn't know if I was missing something important.
Really seems like a waste of time.
I thought I explained that.
Okay, now I see what step you were trying to save me; determining the proper height, as you've already determined it for my car. Thanks! <3
I am having a little trouble with unit conversion though. How many inches per low and how many lows are in a super?
What are you saying? How many inches per low? how many lows are in a super? WTF is that?
General length of coilovers for these cars 8'' front and 7'' rear, which is what I have, and is completly fine.
You don't think dropping the ride height by an inch for a day would require a realignment? How much would it affect toe?
Umm, yeah. You've mentioned that already.
No. I've ridden OEM shocks mostly, which I find to be a bit soft. I currently have these on the front, and I think they're ****. Of course, they were slapped on there by the kid that had it before me. I'm considering going back to the OEM springs, but I also realize that it still has OEM shocks on it. Hell, for all I know, it could have the original shocks.
Now that my car is "roadworthy," I'm getting to the point where I feel like if I'm going to replace something, I'm going to replace it with "the right part," so that got me to thinking about shocks, springs, and setup thereof.
Form follows function.
No, I was looking for some helpful input. Perhaps something like, "Hey, travel will increase a bit as ride height decreases, so give yourself a good margin when lowering," or maybe, "I can pretty much guarantee you're good to an inch and a half, and the OTS springs take off an inch anyway, so go ahead and crank it down a half when you start."
You really are making this hard on yourself, and you wont except it.
The sprngs don't take a inch off. The spring sits on a threaded pearch you thread up to rasie, and down to lower.
With OTS rates, you can't really go that low. The spring rates are just too low.
Umm, with the zip tie…
Well, right. I'm not trying to build some magical suspension that's impossible to bottom out under any circumstances. I figured if I tracked the actual maximum travel over a month, I'd have a pretty good idea of what a reasonable ride height would be for the driving I do and the springs I have.
Maybe in a month I'll instead decide that the springs are too hard/soft/chocolatey for my taste and swap them, but once I do settle on a spring rate, I'm still going to need to set the ride height accordingly.
Right. Hence my concern about lowering it "too much" and restricting my travel beyond a reasonable limit.
Is there a method whose difficulty lies somewhere in between my method — connecting a zip tie and checking it in a month to see how much it moved — and simply choosing arbitrarily and hoping for the best, which isn't technically a "method" in the strictest sense of the term?
I was just trying to come up with a method for determining minimum "safe" ride height for a given set of springs, and wondering if my method was sound, and if anyone knew of a better method. Sorry to have caused such a ruckus.
It's going to change. More, weight, larger bump, etc.
Maybe in a month I'll instead decide that the springs are too hard/soft/chocolatey for my taste and swap them, but once I do settle on a spring rate, I'm still going to need to set the ride height accordingly.
Generaly, when you lower the car you LOOSE travel.
You really are making this hard on yourself, and you wont except it.
I was just trying to come up with a method for determining minimum "safe" ride height for a given set of springs, and wondering if my method was sound, and if anyone knew of a better method. Sorry to have caused such a ruckus.
Umm, with the zip tie…
Well, right. I'm not trying to build some magical suspension that's impossible to bottom out under any circumstances. I figured if I tracked the actual maximum travel over a month, I'd have a pretty good idea of what a reasonable ride height would be for the driving I do and the springs I have.
Still, think it's a waste of time/effort. Honestly, stick them in the car, set them at the height your comfortable with. If your just looking for a mild drop, 2ish inches is around the perfect height. It's low enough to still look good, and have plently of function.
Maybe in a month I'll instead decide that the springs are too hard/soft/chocolatey for my taste and swap them, but once I do settle on a spring rate, I'm still going to need to set the ride height accordingly.
This is where it's not a good idea, these (GC) springs are $60, each. So it's going to get costly, if you want to swap the springs mulitple times.
Right. Hence my concern about lowering it "too much" and restricting my travel beyond a reasonable limit.
Honestly for a street car, I really don't think you have to worry about travel to much, well unles your trying to be slamed. I know the only real issue I have with my car is when I try to get up a steep drive way or something, then it will pick the inner wheel up. Which really isn't a issue.
Is there a method whose difficulty lies somewhere in between my method — connecting a zip tie and checking it in a month to see how much it moved — and simply choosing arbitrarily and hoping for the best, which isn't technically a "method" in the strictest sense of the term?
Set the height, and cruise for a while. Start at the "mild" drop that was suggested and go from them. I promis you, a 2ish inch drop is noithing for a Koni sport with a proper spring rates.
I was just trying to come up with a method for determining minimum "safe" ride height for a given set of springs, and wondering if my method was sound, and if anyone knew of a better method. Sorry to have caused such a ruckus.
Well, right. I'm not trying to build some magical suspension that's impossible to bottom out under any circumstances. I figured if I tracked the actual maximum travel over a month, I'd have a pretty good idea of what a reasonable ride height would be for the driving I do and the springs I have.
Still, think it's a waste of time/effort. Honestly, stick them in the car, set them at the height your comfortable with. If your just looking for a mild drop, 2ish inches is around the perfect height. It's low enough to still look good, and have plently of function.
Maybe in a month I'll instead decide that the springs are too hard/soft/chocolatey for my taste and swap them, but once I do settle on a spring rate, I'm still going to need to set the ride height accordingly.
This is where it's not a good idea, these (GC) springs are $60, each. So it's going to get costly, if you want to swap the springs mulitple times.
Right. Hence my concern about lowering it "too much" and restricting my travel beyond a reasonable limit.
Honestly for a street car, I really don't think you have to worry about travel to much, well unles your trying to be slamed. I know the only real issue I have with my car is when I try to get up a steep drive way or something, then it will pick the inner wheel up. Which really isn't a issue.
Is there a method whose difficulty lies somewhere in between my method — connecting a zip tie and checking it in a month to see how much it moved — and simply choosing arbitrarily and hoping for the best, which isn't technically a "method" in the strictest sense of the term?
Set the height, and cruise for a while. Start at the "mild" drop that was suggested and go from them. I promis you, a 2ish inch drop is noithing for a Koni sport with a proper spring rates.
I was just trying to come up with a method for determining minimum "safe" ride height for a given set of springs, and wondering if my method was sound, and if anyone knew of a better method. Sorry to have caused such a ruckus.
Now, I missed it earlier, but any, I mean any change in ride height will have an affect on the toe. Which could cuase some inner wear on the tires. Even more sence you have already stated you were considering having the front end toe'd out. .03 isn't much, but it's still toe out which is normally the tire killer, even more so when it's mixed with some negative camber.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



