Benson Sleeved F20C
88mm 10.5:1 cp slug
Pauter rods
Stock crank with OEM bearings
Inline pro chain tensioner
ARP head studs

Stock portwork head with stock cams
Ferrea valves with portflow valve job
Supertech spings and Retainers

Synapse Motorsport Turbo kit
GTX4294r (70.3mm)
4" downpipe and exhaust
Twin Tial MV-R wastegates
Tial Q BOV
Garrett core 24x12x4 intercooler

Inline Pro r200 rear end
Competition clutch twin disk
Stock ignition
Stock transmission for now

Double 044 fuel pumps fed from a surge tank.
Walbro 255 feeds the surge tank
AEM EMS v2
ID2000cc injectors
Aeromotive fuel pressure regulator
Inline Pro intake manifold
























http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xlhdi--G3w

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouVMDndKPD8

 

WORD

Complete lack of info

 

6 years to make your first post and this was it?

 

on the edge of my seat for his second post lol

nice numbers, should hopefully run what an 800whp S2k does

 

Fixed

 

that snail is massivE!!!! nice!

 

what do you mean?

 

Good work

What are your track time goals?

 

Good **** very suprised you didnt have

custom web cams

Liberty transmission

Crazy 40 angle port job(done by monkey see monkey do machine shop)

Not **** talking or throwing shots just love to see builds with either stock or close to stock parts making good power. The game and honda tech has changed greatly, and alot of ppl building is misled into thinking you need to mortgage your home to have n build with power. A guy on here was looking to make similar power in his s2 and a shop posted he would need atleast $55k to make that kinda power, and another guy who work at 1of the 2 machine shops everybody go to said a stock s2 wpuld have enoigh flow to make this power

 

And before someone say ima bitter builder who have a chip on my shoulder I dont im just tired of threads and comments misleading ppl with the latest n greatest parts

 

Thanks for adding the info, the car is sick as hell... What I mean is those hub dyno's leave you happy with the number but scratching your head when you hit the track. It should run fast either way, I like dynapacks alot they are great but most from what I have seen read on the high side.

What are you reving the car to? Not much of a powerband to work with unless your reving to 11k or so.

 

Well. Its definately, large.

 

This is my old 30r dyno from last year. The dotted line is bone stock s2000 on their dyno it reads kind of low in my opinion.

as far as revving it out i dont think ill need to do it to reach my goals at the track.

 

We have been known to have a low if not on pair reading dyno. Stock s2000 do 185-192whp, to give you an idea..... It will run it's # no problem if the tranny holds LOL..

 

great works guys, that thing is a beast!

 

Car is going to be a whole new monster. Can't wait to see it out soon

 

Everyone says dynopacks read high. I don't believe it. Go to innovative motorworks and put your stock gsr swapped car on he dyno and you won't break 140 hp.

 

And they freely admitted before changing some parts on their dyno... it read high. My personal car and my friends hatch made 585 and 595 on a d-pack which is enough to run a 10.0 and 145+ if it was off a dynojet and never even came close to that, never went faster than 10.7 and best mph was 142 and there was no "driver error" or any of that bs, that was after 100 passes. Same friend went back to the dyno made 530 on a djet and ran the same damn times lol

Another example is a friend local to me and a Mod on this site, car made 700+ on the same D-pack that I was on and I think its best mph was 148-149 and a 9.9x, another friend of mine (LOL) made 630 in his EG (everyone running SFWD/24.5") and ran the exact same time/mph.

I didnt mean to start an argument here, just stated a fact that I have slowly picked up on through the years, at first I didnt believe it and was a believer that D-Packs read the same as D-Jets. The D-Packs can be manipulated to pretty much read what the operator wants it to read, which kind of sucks when trying to compare numbers, it is the best dyno hands down in my opinion though.

 

You cant base your times off of a dyno. Every one will read differently depending on how the operator sets it up. I have personally seen a full weight em1 with 440whp go 129 tuned on that same dyno. I have never seen a car making 580whp go 149 so I am not sure where you are getting those numbers from.

 

holy crap, you have a toyota prius below 5k rpm

 

a dynopack is sappose to read high
it says flywheel hp it s self
read the graph

when it reads low like a dynojet its setting is too low so go back to innovative motorworks and tell them to give u a flywheel hp reading.

good job on the s2k guys!!!!!!!!!!

 

you can't be serious.

 

where did I state that 580 would run 149? the car that made 630 on a djet was running just as fast as the car making 700+ on the dpack, and 590 on a dpack netted my friend the same times as 530 on a djet.... or roughly 10-12% high throughout.

**** both me and my friend made the dynapack 580-590 on RC1000's and a Walbro 255 BURNING E85 at 50psi base lol That should tell you something right there.

 

[QUOTE=96 GSR-T;45381495}
**** both me and my friend made the dynapack 580-590 on RC1000's and a Walbro 255 BURNING E85 at 50psi base lol That should tell you something right there.[/QUOTE]

i agree with you

on our dynojet
1000cc with 80 base and meth injection can barely make 590whp on e85.....

 

hmmmm so my 80psi base/99% duty on e85 with my little rc 1000's doing 630 ish @25psi is a myth then, and my tuner needs to be fired because he is inflating my numbers on his dynojet????? because there isnt anyway accoring to you guys this is legit???

just asking