4 cylinder hemi. Why not?
I was sitting here looking around on the web at different engine designs after some mini-me research. I know that particular swap raises the compression ratio. I have to ask if its been done before, has there ever been a honda engine modified to have hemispherical combustion chambers? Wouldn't it make sense to do that in our 4 cylinder Honda engines to get the most power out of each bang? Assuming you had the right equipment, would it be worth it?
Better question would be, why doesnt any one make aftermarket heads. People will be running out of good heads to use.
The Honda Pent roof is pretty efficient For the valve angles it has ...
Trending Topics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_L_engine
And why would anyone care about a hemi head design in 2011?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemi_engine
Oh look, an overhead cam hemi, from 1903...
Now, thenext, why on earth do you think a hemispherical head would yield more power compared to the pent roof head found on most performance Honda VTEC engines? If you really had done any research, you see that most information out there points to the pent roof design as superior for power production.
honda heads are "pent-roof" not hemispherical.
hemispherical heads were designed around having only 2 valves one for intake and one for exhaust.
pent-roof is what heads have evolved into with the need to be more efficient with multiple valves.
so no we would not want to go backwards and make the head into a hemispherical head.
hemispherical heads were designed around having only 2 valves one for intake and one for exhaust.
pent-roof is what heads have evolved into with the need to be more efficient with multiple valves.
so no we would not want to go backwards and make the head into a hemispherical head.
honda heads are "pent-roof" not hemispherical.
hemispherical heads were designed around having only 2 valves one for intake and one for exhaust.
pent-roof is what heads have evolved into with the need to be more efficient with multiple valves.
so no we would not want to go backwards and make the head into a hemispherical head.
hemispherical heads were designed around having only 2 valves one for intake and one for exhaust.
pent-roof is what heads have evolved into with the need to be more efficient with multiple valves.
so no we would not want to go backwards and make the head into a hemispherical head.
4-cyl. Hemi's are great! 350 hp for $33K - what a steal!
http://www.moparproshop.com/inc/sdetail/6225/924
http://www.moparproshop.com/inc/sdetail/6225/924
4-cyl. Hemi's are great! 350 hp for $33K - what a steal!
http://www.moparproshop.com/inc/sdetail/6225/924
http://www.moparproshop.com/inc/sdetail/6225/924
4-cyl. Hemi's are great! 350 hp for $33K - what a steal!
http://www.moparproshop.com/inc/sdetail/6225/924
http://www.moparproshop.com/inc/sdetail/6225/924
In that example, I believe you are correct. Result of a quick search.
The P9 Hemi 4-cylinder I had in mind is built by Gary Stanton and besides Kinsler's manifold for it, I can't find much on the web about it.
The P9 Hemi 4-cylinder I had in mind is built by Gary Stanton and besides Kinsler's manifold for it, I can't find much on the web about it.
The Honda Jazz (Fit) base engine runs 2 plugs per cylinder. The US Fit only comes with the high performance variant of the engine which doesn't.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_L_engine
And why would anyone care about a hemi head design in 2011?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemi_engine
Oh look, an overhead cam hemi, from 1903...

Now, thenext, why on earth do you think a hemispherical head would yield more power compared to the pent roof head found on most performance Honda VTEC engines? If you really had done any research, you see that most information out there points to the pent roof design as superior for power production.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_L_engine
And why would anyone care about a hemi head design in 2011?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemi_engine
Oh look, an overhead cam hemi, from 1903...
Now, thenext, why on earth do you think a hemispherical head would yield more power compared to the pent roof head found on most performance Honda VTEC engines? If you really had done any research, you see that most information out there points to the pent roof design as superior for power production.

Then you aren't talking about a Honda performance engine, and there is no point in comparing it to an obsolete and archaic performance design.


It could have been, if you had bothered to do any of the research you claimed to have done in the first post.
There is no point in asking if a modern Honda engine has been modified to try and emulate a design put into use over 100 years ago, unless you wanted to reduce both power and mileage for some strange reason...



You'll learn more in 45 minutes of research than weeks of these threads.
Wouldn't a hemispherical head give lower compression ratios due to the increased volume also?
Plus, say HEMI aloud. It just sounds all tough, bulky, slow.
Say VTEC aloud and it sounds quicker and more nimble.
Theres a good reason americans still advertise HEMI, and its not because
their car actually runs a hemispherical cylinder head.
Plus, say HEMI aloud. It just sounds all tough, bulky, slow.
Say VTEC aloud and it sounds quicker and more nimble.
Theres a good reason americans still advertise HEMI, and its not because
their car actually runs a hemispherical cylinder head.
http://www.h1v8.com
The only thing enabling the hyabusa to crank that high is the lightness of the valvetrain and the strength of the springs... you can modify a honda head to crank that high as well... you'd need to change the cam grind for more overlap too so you'd get more cylinder filling at high RPM, along with some crazy boost to put the air in there fast enough





