E85 N/A with stock compression
What is everyone's opinion on using E85 with 10.6-10.8 compression?
I hear that it is too low to see much in the way of power increases.
I searched around and didn't find much on it out side of a b16 that wasn't baselined before the test.
??
I hear that it is too low to see much in the way of power increases.
I searched around and didn't find much on it out side of a b16 that wasn't baselined before the test.
??
I heard this from a buddy who talked to a "reputable tuner" and the tuner also said that he would not benefit much from this. But i have seen 93 vs e85 dyno charts of stock k's making a good amount of power over 93. So far from what i know and seen e85 allows you to run more aggressive timing without getting knock or damaging your engine. So i wouldn't see why it wouldn't benefit from the change.
Higher compression makes ICEs more efficient in extracting energy from expanding gasses (better thermal efficiency). If you're not taking advantage of the anti-knock/det qualitites of E85 which has less energy density than petrol then you're not going to see much benefit. Yes, you can add some ignition timing and get a little more power and E85's vapour pressure is lower so you'll get a mild cooling effect on the intake charge as well, but unless there's a financial incentive I'd stick to gasoline if keeping stock compression.
-P
-P
For the same fuel mass, E85 has less energy than gasoline, but a stoichiometric mixture of E85 has more energy than a stoichiometric mixture of gasoline. However, the difference is only 1-2%.
It's pretty much like the typical 93 vs. 87 octane question. If you have an engine that can take advantage of 93 octane fuel, you'll benefit from using it. Otherwise, you'll just waste money.
It's pretty much like the typical 93 vs. 87 octane question. If you have an engine that can take advantage of 93 octane fuel, you'll benefit from using it. Otherwise, you'll just waste money.
This is no scientific comparison by any means. A friend of mine has a 2000 civic si, I have a gsr swapped EK hatch. Both had intake and exhaust, the SI had s300. Before the SI changed to E85 I pulled about 1-1/2 cars from a stop/5mph roll to 80. After the conversion the cars were dead even to the SI slightly pulling in first and second. The only tuning that was done was to compensate for the 450cc injectors.
There is definitely a power advantage to changing to E85 for sure. Plus its cheaper. Gas mileage is slightly worse. Hard to say exactly how much as the si is just a weekend car and gets beat on every time its driven.
There is definitely a power advantage to changing to E85 for sure. Plus its cheaper. Gas mileage is slightly worse. Hard to say exactly how much as the si is just a weekend car and gets beat on every time its driven.
I ran E85 in my b16a for about a year with on problems the only reason i stopped using E85 is the only pump was a 30miles round trip from me and half of the time it was out of order.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
madking411
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
31
Feb 4, 2011 05:45 AM
highflyinhonda
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
5
Dec 6, 2005 10:33 PM




