All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

Exhaust Cam VS Intake Cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 03:40 AM
  #1  
Earthworm Jim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,051
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan, New York
Default Exhaust Cam VS Intake Cam

Based on what I've read (please correct me if I'm wrong, that's the point of this thread), intake cams produce more power on lower RPMs and exhaust cams produce more power at higher RPMs, is that correct? I read descriptions on both and they both say,"add power throughout the entire powerband" but they must actually be different. What's on your opinion on a N/A car? Obviously (based on if I'm right), in Hondas, higher RPM is better, anything after 5000rpm, right? I want to build a K20A2 N/A and want a good cam to start things off with.

This is a website that I looked at, it also has a diagram if you scroll to the bottom: http://auto.howstuffworks.com/camshaft.htm

Any help would be appreciated
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 04:10 AM
  #2  
Earthworm Jim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,051
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan, New York
Default Re: Exhaust Cam VS Intake Cam

Bump cause I realize that I was the only one awake when I posted this, lol.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 05:22 AM
  #3  
Earthworm Jim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,051
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan, New York
Default Re: Exhaust Cam VS Intake Cam

Bump for people to stop just stopping by to read, lol.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 07:38 AM
  #4  
Earthworm Jim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,051
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan, New York
Default Re: Exhaust Cam VS Intake Cam

bump
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 08:34 PM
  #5  
gstrudler's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 2
From: Oregon City, OR, USA
Default Re: Exhaust Cam VS Intake Cam

I think you need to spend a little more time researching; your k20a2 is a dual overhead cam, so you don't have the same limitations in cam design as a conventional SOHC as shown in that article.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 09:04 PM
  #6  
HiProfile's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 7
From: b00sting my D16s, SoWis, USA
Default Re: Exhaust Cam VS Intake Cam

Actually, typical "large" intake cams have the ability to kill more low-end power than "large" exhaust cams. They tend to open sooner and close later, meaning you create a pressure wave up the intake runner before you should for low rpm (early opening), and push some air out of the cylinder since the valve is still open as the piston comes back up.

A weak exhaust cam profile will mainly restrict high-end because air doesn't like to go past a certain speed, at which point it chokes. Add lift and duration, and you raise that point far up he rpm band - to the point the port is the choke point. This is why someone might say an exhaust cam is for top-end.

The only way I can figure you're thinking how you are, is how cam timing crap like VVT-i or the "i" in i-vtec advances the intake cam (increasing overlap). Generally, you would retard both to shift power towards redline, and advance to shift it towards idle. In this case, more overlap is better than overall cam timing.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 02:14 AM
  #7  
Earthworm Jim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,051
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan, New York
Default Re: Exhaust Cam VS Intake Cam

Originally Posted by gstrudler
I think you need to spend a little more time researching; your k20a2 is a dual overhead cam, so you don't have the same limitations in cam design as a conventional SOHC as shown in that article.
http://www.jhpusa.com/store/pc/viewC...idCategory=343

Click and scroll cuz
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 02:15 AM
  #8  
Earthworm Jim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,051
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan, New York
Default Re: Exhaust Cam VS Intake Cam

Originally Posted by HiProfile
Actually, typical "large" intake cams have the ability to kill more low-end power than "large" exhaust cams. They tend to open sooner and close later, meaning you create a pressure wave up the intake runner before you should for low rpm (early opening), and push some air out of the cylinder since the valve is still open as the piston comes back up.

A weak exhaust cam profile will mainly restrict high-end because air doesn't like to go past a certain speed, at which point it chokes. Add lift and duration, and you raise that point far up he rpm band - to the point the port is the choke point. This is why someone might say an exhaust cam is for top-end.

The only way I can figure you're thinking how you are, is how cam timing crap like VVT-i or the "i" in i-vtec advances the intake cam (increasing overlap). Generally, you would retard both to shift power towards redline, and advance to shift it towards idle. In this case, more overlap is better than overall cam timing.
Long story short, it doesn't matter.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StupidSlowRSX
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
7
Aug 1, 2011 05:25 PM
no_sir
Forced Induction
14
Apr 8, 2007 07:04 PM
dragnsi
Tech / Misc
6
Jan 27, 2005 11:18 AM
94B18B1Teg
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
4
Dec 28, 2004 07:46 PM
Death_to_Thieves
Acura Integra Type-R
4
Dec 5, 2002 11:00 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:00 PM.