Honda Of civic is burnt-out because of the charging from the cell phon
Thread Starter
TRIAL USER
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Honda Of civic is burnt-out because of the charging from the cell phon
Honda civic is burnt-out because of the charging from the cell phone
The decision, which it is difficult to name not only objective, but also logical, passed the law court of the Moscow city Of [balashikha], which recognized the illegality of the actions of [avtolyubitelnitsy], which wished to recharge the cell phone through [prikurivatel], why new foreign-produced brand was burnt-out, hardly without having deprived of life the mistress “of Japanese”. The automobile Of honda Of civic 42- summer Natalia [Finogenova] purchased in 2007. On July 31, 2008 on the Sadovoye Kol'tso [Moscow ringroad] in the region of Garden- triumphal street practically new automobile caught fire at full speed. All doors in the machine proved to be automatically they were blocked. Woman miraculously avoided loss. The case of the spontaneous combustion of automobile because of the telephone charging salesmen did not recognize as guarantee. Automobile was insured on THE HELMETS; however, insurers refused to compensate damage. Insurance company stated that the fire was not the result of the insurance case, provided by the rules of insurance.
The case of the spontaneous combustion of automobile because of the telephone charging salesmen did not recognize as guarantee. Automobile was insured on THE HELMETS; however, insurers refused to compensate damage. Insurance company stated that the fire was not the result of the insurance case, provided by the rules of insurance.
As responder in the law court protruded company “[FK] Of [motors]” - the official dealer Of honda, in salon of which Natalia it acquired automobile. As the official reason for fire the examination, carried out within the framework of court trial, recognized “the heat aging of isolation”, reports the site “of kolesa.ru” with the reference on GZT.RU. On the version of specialist, burning occurred because to [prikurivatelyu] of automobile was too for long connected less powerful instrument, than [prikurivatel] itself.
True, expert did not give not one technical substantiation of his conclusions and specified, it is how long necessary so that from [prikurivatelya] would go smoke. “Into the expert report stated that the installation could not catch fire and that to us simply it did not transport”, described [Finogenova].
The results of the independent examination, ordered by the owner of the automobile, where the specialists argumentatively explain, that the reason for burning of automobile was the emergency operation of conductor, and this emergency operation is the consequence of the defect, allowed during assembling of automobile at the manufacturing plant, law court was disregarded. Furthermore, law court ignored, that in the operating instructions of automobile there is no prohibition to the use of [prikurivatelya] not according to the straight designation. In “[FK] Of [motors]” and [OOO] “[Khonda] motor RUS” to journalists refused in any commentaries. It is interesting that the company Of honda produces the auto-refrigerators, which are recommended to connect precisely to [prikurivatelyu]. “It turns out that Honda produce two goods, with joint use of which can occur the fire. And company conceals information about this ", reflect experts. But if in the instruction there are no prohibitions, from where buyer, who does not possess special knowledge, can know that to use [prikurivatel] for the charging of instruments is unsafe, the owner of automobile adds. “In the last 10 years the function of [prikurivatelya] changed, and now very few people is used it for [prikurivaniya], then connect to it different devices”, supported [Finogenovu] Dmitriy [Yanin], chairman of the administration of the international confederation of the societies of users. Entire occurred - problem is faster the producer, who prescribed to use [prikurivatel] only according to the straight designation, but it did not indicate this in the instruction, expert noted. According to legislation, the salesman, who did not grant to the buyer of complete and adequate information about the goods, bears responsibility for the deficiencies in the goods, which arose after his transfer to user as a result of the absence in it of this information. With the reason for the harm of life, to health and to the property of user as a result of [nepredostavleniya] to it complete and adequate information about the goods, the user is right to require the compensation of this harm.
Sorry for not very good automatic translation to English
Original link on Russian site is here
http://spbvoditel.ru/2010/03/25/025/
and here http://www.gzt.ru/topnews/society/-h...a-/297354.html
http://yandex.ru/yandsearch?p=1&text...%B4%D0%B0&lr=2
The decision, which it is difficult to name not only objective, but also logical, passed the law court of the Moscow city Of [balashikha], which recognized the illegality of the actions of [avtolyubitelnitsy], which wished to recharge the cell phone through [prikurivatel], why new foreign-produced brand was burnt-out, hardly without having deprived of life the mistress “of Japanese”. The automobile Of honda Of civic 42- summer Natalia [Finogenova] purchased in 2007. On July 31, 2008 on the Sadovoye Kol'tso [Moscow ringroad] in the region of Garden- triumphal street practically new automobile caught fire at full speed. All doors in the machine proved to be automatically they were blocked. Woman miraculously avoided loss. The case of the spontaneous combustion of automobile because of the telephone charging salesmen did not recognize as guarantee. Automobile was insured on THE HELMETS; however, insurers refused to compensate damage. Insurance company stated that the fire was not the result of the insurance case, provided by the rules of insurance.
The case of the spontaneous combustion of automobile because of the telephone charging salesmen did not recognize as guarantee. Automobile was insured on THE HELMETS; however, insurers refused to compensate damage. Insurance company stated that the fire was not the result of the insurance case, provided by the rules of insurance.
As responder in the law court protruded company “[FK] Of [motors]” - the official dealer Of honda, in salon of which Natalia it acquired automobile. As the official reason for fire the examination, carried out within the framework of court trial, recognized “the heat aging of isolation”, reports the site “of kolesa.ru” with the reference on GZT.RU. On the version of specialist, burning occurred because to [prikurivatelyu] of automobile was too for long connected less powerful instrument, than [prikurivatel] itself.
True, expert did not give not one technical substantiation of his conclusions and specified, it is how long necessary so that from [prikurivatelya] would go smoke. “Into the expert report stated that the installation could not catch fire and that to us simply it did not transport”, described [Finogenova].
The results of the independent examination, ordered by the owner of the automobile, where the specialists argumentatively explain, that the reason for burning of automobile was the emergency operation of conductor, and this emergency operation is the consequence of the defect, allowed during assembling of automobile at the manufacturing plant, law court was disregarded. Furthermore, law court ignored, that in the operating instructions of automobile there is no prohibition to the use of [prikurivatelya] not according to the straight designation. In “[FK] Of [motors]” and [OOO] “[Khonda] motor RUS” to journalists refused in any commentaries. It is interesting that the company Of honda produces the auto-refrigerators, which are recommended to connect precisely to [prikurivatelyu]. “It turns out that Honda produce two goods, with joint use of which can occur the fire. And company conceals information about this ", reflect experts. But if in the instruction there are no prohibitions, from where buyer, who does not possess special knowledge, can know that to use [prikurivatel] for the charging of instruments is unsafe, the owner of automobile adds. “In the last 10 years the function of [prikurivatelya] changed, and now very few people is used it for [prikurivaniya], then connect to it different devices”, supported [Finogenovu] Dmitriy [Yanin], chairman of the administration of the international confederation of the societies of users. Entire occurred - problem is faster the producer, who prescribed to use [prikurivatel] only according to the straight designation, but it did not indicate this in the instruction, expert noted. According to legislation, the salesman, who did not grant to the buyer of complete and adequate information about the goods, bears responsibility for the deficiencies in the goods, which arose after his transfer to user as a result of the absence in it of this information. With the reason for the harm of life, to health and to the property of user as a result of [nepredostavleniya] to it complete and adequate information about the goods, the user is right to require the compensation of this harm.
Sorry for not very good automatic translation to English
Original link on Russian site is here
http://spbvoditel.ru/2010/03/25/025/
and here http://www.gzt.ru/topnews/society/-h...a-/297354.html
http://yandex.ru/yandsearch?p=1&text...%B4%D0%B0&lr=2
Last edited by From_russia; Mar 25, 2010 at 08:58 AM.
