Any SCCA IT guys here: Vote "yes" for the motor mount rule change
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Any SCCA IT guys here: Vote "yes" for the motor mount rule change
We're finally getting the chance to get motor mounts in IT. Please vote yes to the CRB for this rule change to get it done.
Request #164
Wording
"Engine mounts of alternate design and/or material may be used, but there can be no change to the engine’s fore, aft or vertical location. Engine mounts must attach to the engine and the chassis in their stock locations."
Vote Yes Here
http://www.crbscca.com/
-Tom
Request #164
Wording
"Engine mounts of alternate design and/or material may be used, but there can be no change to the engine’s fore, aft or vertical location. Engine mounts must attach to the engine and the chassis in their stock locations."
Vote Yes Here
http://www.crbscca.com/
-Tom
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
From: North Las Vegas, NV, USA
Re: Any SCCA IT guys here: Vote "yes" for the motor mount rule change
Me too! Although, for now, I'm sticking with my 3M Window Weld'ed factory mounts.
I'm still trying to figure out ultimately what the ITAC's philosophy is. Real world philosophy, not just what it says on the first page of the ITCS in the GCR.
For instance, McPherson strut cars are allowed to slot their upper attachment points to adjust camber, but those of us with double wishbone's aren't allowed anything so easy like Ingalls camber adjusters. Can anyone explain that?
Sorry, don't mean to hijack the thread. Send your letters, IT folks!
I'm still trying to figure out ultimately what the ITAC's philosophy is. Real world philosophy, not just what it says on the first page of the ITCS in the GCR.
For instance, McPherson strut cars are allowed to slot their upper attachment points to adjust camber, but those of us with double wishbone's aren't allowed anything so easy like Ingalls camber adjusters. Can anyone explain that?
Sorry, don't mean to hijack the thread. Send your letters, IT folks!
Suspetise...
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,287
Likes: 1
From: Burninating the peasants yo
Re: Any SCCA IT guys here: Vote "yes" for the motor mount rule change
I think it has something to do with available dynamic camber in a double wishbone car, and complete lack of dynamic camber in a MacPherson strut car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Drew Peacock
Forced Induction
23
Dec 3, 2004 03:31 PM
