what times for 0-60 are people getting for unmodified rsx-s?
Thanks

 

about 6.0 sec, some have recorded 5.8, varies on magazine journalists and drivers....

 

thats bs rsx type s cant do no 0-60 in 6 secs flat....maybe high 6 very high 6 or 7's

rsx type r does 0-60 in 6 sec's flat fastest ive seen for type r is 5.8


[Modified by MECCJOO84, 8:30 PM 9/2/2002]

 

Car & Driver recorded a 6.1 second 0-60 time

 

Wow hard to believe with a stock Type S....

The Australian Dc5R does about mid to high 6's. However im sure if driven to its potential may be in the low 6's to mid 6's....

Cheers

 

the new ITR does it in 6.1 i dont know how the type s can do the same ....? but then you never know

 

that doesnt sound right send a link or tell us wat issue it says that lik tsunami said the r does 0-60 in about 6 or the fastest ive seen was 5.8........


[Modified by MECCJOO84, 6:39 PM 9/3/2002]

 

You ask, I deliver

http://www.caranddriver.com/xp/Caran...l?keywords=RSX

 

i see it but i still dont believe it wow its a fast car didnt think it was faster than the r (must hav been a slow r) o well....

 

Honestly Who cares about 0-60? that **** is point less! talk about 1/4 mile or some **** like that. 0-60 is trash.

 

i agree but still seems too fast for an s.....wow an s can do 0-60 in 6.1 yet an r can only do it in about the same time or a little faster hmm wonder where the extra 20 horses and lsd went


[Modified by MECCJOO84, 9:25 PM 9/3/2002]

 

Torque? Gearing? A lot of variables can account for performance, including weather conditions. For example Road & Track tested their 'Hot cars under 25k' in 100+ degree weather and their performance stats are significantly (and consistently) slower than other numbers available for those cars.

 

 

somebody posted it once from some website ....it stated 0-60 to be 6.1 seconds...but really that doesnt mean much to me either, i'd rather see real 1/4 mile times

 

Car and Driver times always seem to be the fastest. I've heard (don't remember where) that sometimes the magazines exaggerate their times to show that they are superior drivers, or better editors from competing magazines.

I watched my friend with a stock '01 ITR take an RSX S with an intake on the street. Obviously this doesn't prove much because of driver skill and other variables, but if the S was that fast I think it should have been even or faster than the ITR.

 

Just out of curiosity what is the 1/4mi and 0-60 for the base RSX and for the sportshift model?

 

Stock Type-S doin 0-60 in 6 seconds? mmm... Maybe high 6's. I don't think it can pull a 6 second flat unless its goin downhill...

 

I was really wondering what kind of times real people - owners - were getting at timed runs. I thought that might be more realistic than the times the mags report as they differ by 7/10's of a second (maybe more).

 

I dunno about 0-60 times, but people in clubrsx have pulled anywhere in the range of high 14's with some mods, intake and exhaust, people pulled in around low 15's stock. Check the 1320 forum for time slips

 

i could understand high 14's with boltons cuz intake makes a difference exhaust not as much

 

Unless the car was some sort of fluke or preproduction model, I don't know what to tell you. Maybe C&D writers are just better drivers

They tested a Type S in a coupe comparo recently and I'm pretty sure they got similar numbers. I'll try to dig it up

 

Maybe someone who has an RSX-S and also a G-tech and is willling to do some testing and enlighten us...the G-tech would be within .1 -.2 sec accuracy....I've got the G-tech, but alas, not RSX-S...doh.
Ps - according to the G-tech, my best 0-60 was 6.9 in a '94 GSR with only a K&N in the stock airobox...

 

well going back to the rsx doing 0-60 in about 6 ticks...maybe the c&d drovers got a strong motor and was faster than other S's

 

BoA ROCKS!!!!

 

yup.....