rmf replica ITR dyno
Set up
Stock ITR everything except
JDM itr oversize pistons
RS*R exhaust system
No name intake with icebox
magnaflow 2.5 cat
RMF replica header (vteckidd)
Tuned on S300
The motor has a fresh rebuild, about 560 miles on it.
Comments?
Stock ITR everything except
JDM itr oversize pistons
RS*R exhaust system
No name intake with icebox
magnaflow 2.5 cat
RMF replica header (vteckidd)
Tuned on S300
The motor has a fresh rebuild, about 560 miles on it.
Comments?
Last edited by jordanitr; Nov 13, 2009 at 09:56 PM.
Numbers look good you could probably squeeze out a bit more power dropping the rsr exhaust. That exhaust tho is one of the best classic sleeper exhaust for daily driving.
Nice to see that your dyno operator uses SAE corrected numbers with a 5 smoothing. Those are good numbers for what you have, don't let anyone tell you otherwise. A before and after dyno would have been ideal though.
Trending Topics
^Mugen is sick and has a nice tone!
Jordanitr, is your AFRs in the 11s in the higher RPMs? Looks like you could get a few more if you trim the fuel a lil bit in that area and add a degree or two of timing.
Jordanitr, is your AFRs in the 11s in the higher RPMs? Looks like you could get a few more if you trim the fuel a lil bit in that area and add a degree or two of timing.
seems oke, bit low for the mods tough, since stock itr's do those kind of numbers.
my stock itr on a WAI and 2.5" exhaust did 193whp/104+mph (coupe on streettires) FYI
my stock itr on a WAI and 2.5" exhaust did 193whp/104+mph (coupe on streettires) FYI
Yeah i think that dyno is pretty low. My buddy has a gsr with the ebay itr intake mani aka brothers and the tb hytech replica header and a ebay exhaust tuned on crome he made 184 128 tq i think the tuner maybe at fault. I think that's a conservative tune a/f maybe ok but no timing.
That dotted afr line is between 12:1 or 13:1, not really all that conservative.
There's too many factors that could have contributed to the "low" numbers. Low reading dyno, improper break-in of motor, untuned ignition timing, clearances too tight...etc.
There's too many factors that could have contributed to the "low" numbers. Low reading dyno, improper break-in of motor, untuned ignition timing, clearances too tight...etc.
Once again people you cannot compare dyno's however the fact that this graph was properly done using SAE correction is probably why some think the numbers are "low" when comparing to uncorrected numbers.
I made 174-175/132 with a US ITR + DC JDM and 2.25 tanabe hyper medalion (no cat) with fuel tuning VAFC hack (hey it was 02 okay) Toda cam gears (minor cam gear tuning)
With a real tune that setup had some room to grow... I was hoping for 180-185ish...with a real header/exhaust combo it would have made a ton more
These days it has to be no cat, 2.5+ header back and a decent big tube header...195-200whp or so...add some cams and 210-215 should be the mark "to be"
My opinion anyway...I was happy with 4800 vtec cross over and 132ftlbs in the mid range which many said was "high" for the setup
I also wouldnt mess with B series NA anymore...I was looking to go K in 03 and now I am settled on H2B...hate cable shifted trans and love B series gear ratios/strength
I baselined 159whp before tuning/mods on that 248c dynojet at 3000ft elevation - obviously corrected to SAE because I know at higher elevations my car never felt as quick as my trips home (SoCal) at sea level.
With a real tune that setup had some room to grow... I was hoping for 180-185ish...with a real header/exhaust combo it would have made a ton more
These days it has to be no cat, 2.5+ header back and a decent big tube header...195-200whp or so...add some cams and 210-215 should be the mark "to be"
My opinion anyway...I was happy with 4800 vtec cross over and 132ftlbs in the mid range which many said was "high" for the setup
I also wouldnt mess with B series NA anymore...I was looking to go K in 03 and now I am settled on H2B...hate cable shifted trans and love B series gear ratios/strength
I baselined 159whp before tuning/mods on that 248c dynojet at 3000ft elevation - obviously corrected to SAE because I know at higher elevations my car never felt as quick as my trips home (SoCal) at sea level.
Hey, just noticed you were tuned at RREV. Did Jeff do the work?
Those guys are cool!
Anyway. My motor put down 195/129 on that dyno
B18C1
P30 pistons
Blox B's
Portfolw valvetrain
Blox intake mani
3'' Short ram
RMF replica header/test pipe
Skunk2 Mega Power exhaust
RC 310's
Hondata S100
Those guys are cool!
Anyway. My motor put down 195/129 on that dyno
B18C1
P30 pistons
Blox B's
Portfolw valvetrain
Blox intake mani
3'' Short ram
RMF replica header/test pipe
Skunk2 Mega Power exhaust
RC 310's
Hondata S100
Do you still have the dyno graph?
The tuning was done by Thomas from torquefreaks when it was still in business, he is very good for all motor stuff.
The tuning was done by Thomas from torquefreaks when it was still in business, he is very good for all motor stuff.
Last edited by jordanitr; Nov 18, 2009 at 11:27 AM.
Alot of people have been buying this rmf replica, could you guys post your dynos of this header with pretty much simular build.
I'm kinda thinking this header might actually be crap.. but I could be wrong....
I'm kinda thinking this header might actually be crap.. but I could be wrong....
i probably had one of the bad units, cause it made the same peak power and powerband as my stock cast 4-2-1 unit with a 2.25 inch collector.
both graph's at the same dyno, excactly same setup, RMF replica being the only difference (both corrected numbers+both tuned for max power AFR/timing).
can you see wich is the RMF?






