Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

BIG rear anti-roll bar?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 12:31 PM
  #1  
vwandhondaboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Default BIG rear anti-roll bar?

Who's done it? What do you think?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 12:32 PM
  #2  
Reid's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Yokohama, Japan
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (vwandhondaboy)

Who's done it? What do you think?
Try the RoadRacing/Autox forum.

Sadly hardly anyone in this forum uses their car for its intended purpose.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 12:47 PM
  #3  
ZygSpeed's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 12,092
Likes: 2
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (Reid)

Aww Reid, you're making us look bad!

In answer to your question, it depends!
Autocross or roadcourse?
Do you have stiffer shocks, or stock?
How good are you at handling oversteer, and in particular lift throttle over steer?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 12:49 PM
  #4  
PYITR821's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,421
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (vwandhondaboy)

Is this Big enough for ya?

Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 12:50 PM
  #5  
Reid's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Yokohama, Japan
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (Zygspeed)

Aww Reid, you're making us look bad!

In answer to your question, it depends!
Autocross or roadcourse?
Do you have stiffer shocks, or stock?
How good are you at handling oversteer, and in particular lift throttle over steer?
Well I assume when he said "BIG rear anti-roll bar" he meant a Realtime setup or something similar.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 12:56 PM
  #6  
PYITR821's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,421
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (vwandhondaboy)

I hear Mugen's rear sway bar works pretty damn good.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 12:56 PM
  #7  
ZygSpeed's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 12,092
Likes: 2
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (Reid)

hehe, THAT is a big one!

Though, I didn't make that assumption.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 01:33 PM
  #8  
o_Rage_o's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (Zygspeed)

guy thats sick..

I want one

-Rage
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 01:36 PM
  #9  
Reid's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Yokohama, Japan
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (o_Rage_o)

I want one
For your track only vehicle, right?

This would be highly illogical on a street-driven car.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 01:42 PM
  #10  
MK Ultra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 0
From: too close to Oklahoma
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (Reid)

Sadly hardly anyone in this forum uses their car for its intended purpose.
The car's intended purpose is to be driven on the street.

If I were to buy a track car I wouldn't waste my money on an Integra. I'd buy a Lotus 7.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 01:46 PM
  #11  
Reid's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Yokohama, Japan
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (MK Ultra)

The car's intended purpose is to be driven on the street.
Yes it is a street car.

But was it modified by Honda to be great for illegal drag racing and ripping through canyons late at night?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 01:48 PM
  #12  
MK Ultra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 0
From: too close to Oklahoma
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar?

But was it modified by Honda to be great for illegal drag racing and ripping through canyons late at night?
I'd consider such acts idiotic and inconsiderate in any car.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 01:50 PM
  #13  
Big Phat R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 2
From: Kelowna Canada
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (vwandhondaboy)

Bigger is not necessarily an improvement - it depends on a number of factors....:

(from turnfast.com)

Anti-roll Bars

The primary function of anti-roll bars is to reduce body roll by adding to the roll resistance of the springs.

An anti-roll bar, also referred to as a stabilizer or sway bar, is a bar or tube which connects some part of the left and right sides of the suspension system. On independent suspension systems, the connection point is usually the lower control arm.

Most cars have a front anti-roll bar, and most sports cars are going to have both a front and rear bar. After market bars are going to be stiffer than the stock ones.

Roll Resistance

Anti-roll bars are used to reduce body roll during cornering. They add to the roll resistance of the suspension springs for a higher overall roll resistance Because the primary purpose of the spring is to maintain maximum contact with the road surface over imperfections, we must settle for the roll resistance provided, and it is rarely enough. The anti-roll bar adds to the roll resistance without resorting to an overly stiff spring. A properly selected anti-roll bar will reduce body roll in corners for improved cornering traction, but will not increase the harshness of the ride, or reduce the effectiveness of the tire to maintain good road surface contact.

So, how does limiting body roll improve handling? The suspension system geometry (the lengths and connecting points of its parts) of a street car is designed to keep the bottom of the tire parallel with the road for maximum contact patch. At rest, the car's suspension has a particular geometric relationship to the road surface. Body roll changes that relationship, and reduces the suspension's ability to keep the tire parallel to the road.

During body roll, the car body is no longer parallel with the road, and neither is the suspension geometry. Even though the suspension allows the wheel to be somewhat independent from the body, the high cornering forces, and resulting large body roll of a factory car, on the track take the suspension close to its limits where it affects the angle of the wheel.

Large amounts of body roll cause the wheels to tilt away from the corner which lifts the edges of the tire and reduces the contact patch size. While this can be compensated for by having the wheel purposely tilted inward to start (adding negative camber), there is a practical limit to this which is not enough in most cars to compensate entirely for the body roll. The anti-roll bar reduces the amount of body roll, and therefore helps to maintain as much of the contact patch as possible.

As with all good things, more is better only to a point. Because the anti-roll bar connects the left and right sides, this reduces the independence of independent suspension. Too stiff a bar, and you can cause too much loss in the ability of the left or the right wheel to independently respond to road surface imperfections. The purpose of suspension is to maintain maximum tire contact with the road. The purpose of independent suspension is to allow the left and right wheels to each seek that contact separately. The left wheel may need to be going down when the right needs to be going up. If they were tied together as with the old floating rear axles, one or both of the wheels is not achieving maximum contact. In fact, too stiff an anti-roll bar can actually cause an inside wheel to lift completely off the ground during hard cornering.

When cornering, the bar will twist with the outside end being pushed down, and the inside end being lifted (just like the body of the car). On the outside tire, this downward pressure helps increase tire traction. However, on the inside tire, the anti-roll bar is pushing up on the suspension reducing the downward force the spring is trying to place to keep the tire on road. If the anti-roll bar is too stiff, it will overpower the spring, prevent it from extending enough to keep the tire on the road, and the wheel will actually lift off the ground. This is not an optimum situation, but it is common in several racing classes. The cause is not so much poor engineering, but the limitations of the class rules that allow the engineer to compensate for it.

Roll Coupling

The anti-roll bar is also used to tune the roll coupling of the chassis. Roll coupling is the relationship of the roll resistance of the front of the car and the roll resistance of the rear.

The balance of the roll coupling, because of its effect on traction, has influence on whether the car has a tendency to understeer or oversteer. While this can be caused by several factors, the anti-roll bar (especially, an adjustable one), can be used to compensate.

As we mentioned, the anti-roll bar helps increase the mechanical downforce of the outside tire during cornering. This increases the traction of that tire, and that end of the car (front or rear). An increase in traction at that end, may leave the opposite end with too little traction. An imbalance of traction occurs, and one end of the car will lose traction before the other end. If the front tires lose traction before the rear tires, the car will understeer. If the rear tires lose traction before the front tires, the car will oversteer. Changing the anti-roll bar stiffness can adjust this out.

Summary

The anti-roll bar reduces body roll to keep the suspension geometry, and ultimately the tire, parallel with the road. Stiffer bars reduce body roll more, but too stiff a bar can deteriorate independent suspension performance, and ultimately cause an inside tire to lift off the ground during hard cornering.

The anti-roll bar can also be a major tuning element in reducing excessive understeer or oversteer. Used incorrectly it can also cause it.

Like other parts you can buy for the car, the "killer" biggest, stiffest anti-roll bar you can buy is rarely going to be the appropriate choice. Look for someone experienced with your car, and can take into account the shocks and springs already installed in your car.

Many car chassis' cannot handle a big rear bar (without breaking) unless you do some chassis modifications. As well - you will not benefit from a stiffer bars' properties if the chassis flexes a lot. Caveat emptor

Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 01:50 PM
  #14  
Reid's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Yokohama, Japan
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (MK Ultra)

I'd consider such acts idiotic and inconsiderate in any car.
Agreed.

I guess the best use for the car is trying to win the "JDM class" at the show with it.

EDIT:

It can best be summed up in this:

If you don't drive your ITR on the track, you don't know what you're missing.


[Modified by Reid, 12:51 PM 8/30/2002]
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 01:51 PM
  #15  
norice's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA, USA
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (MK Ultra)

Thje RealTime bar is hollow. If it were solid at the same diameter the RealTime cars would be driving backwards through nearly every corner.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 01:55 PM
  #16  
MK Ultra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 0
From: too close to Oklahoma
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (Reid)

It can best be summed up in this:

If you don't drive your ITR on the track, you don't know what you're missing.
I'll agree with that. For a glorified econobox the ITR does surprisingly well on a track.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 03:17 PM
  #17  
Rob :190:'s Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,980
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC, USA
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (Reid)


If you don't drive your ITR on the track, you don't know what you're missing.


rob- who's never been on the track, and may think about moving on from the ITR because of this
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 03:19 PM
  #18  
Reid's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Yokohama, Japan
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? ( Rob)

rob- who's never been on the track, and may think about moving on from the ITR because of this
Wouldn't it be easier to drive your ITR on the track rather than move on?

It isn't so much a **** message of "DRIVE YOUR CAR ON THE TRACK OR DIE", but instead it's a friendly message of "Why don't you try this?"
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 04:14 PM
  #19  
vwandhondaboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (Reid)

Hey Big Fat, good article. Already knew that, the VDub guys all swear by big rear sway bars (that's why the inside rear wheel always lifts on Dubs), but the rear suspension on a Dub IS a big sway bar, it's never going to be truly independent, only semi.

Just wanted to know if the ITR guys/gals did the same thing, cause when I go to the track about 95% of the ITR's lift the rear inside wheel too like a peeing dog.

I guess independent supension isn't all that important in the back if the ITR boys are not utilizing it.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 04:37 PM
  #20  
Warren's Avatar
Wrong-Way Wang
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 0
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (norice)

Thje RealTime bar is hollow. If it were solid at the same diameter the RealTime cars would be driving backwards through nearly every corner.
No. Hollow vs Solid makes extremely little difference in terms of torsional rigidity.

If I had my pick, hollow would be it, but it's more expensive to make a bent hollow bar.

Warren
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 04:43 PM
  #21  
ZygSpeed's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 12,092
Likes: 2
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (Warren)

No. Hollow vs Solid makes extremely little difference in terms of torsional rigidity.
Sorry Warren, I beg to differ.
The torsional rigidity is for the most part based/influenced on the outer portion of the bar (almost a "skin" effect).
Or so my ME friend keeps telling me.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 05:29 PM
  #22  
Willard's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 11,967
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (Zygspeed)

The torsional rigidity is for the most part based/influenced on the outer portion of the bar
correct.. so the material near the center does nothing but add weight.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 07:00 PM
  #23  
Warren's Avatar
Wrong-Way Wang
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 0
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (Zygspeed)

Sorry Warren, I beg to differ.
The torsional rigidity is for the most part based/influenced on the outer portion of the bar (almost a "skin" effect).
Or so my ME friend keeps telling me.
So how's that any different than what I just said?

Warren
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 07:23 PM
  #24  
thk's Avatar
thk
Members Only
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
From: New York, NY, USA
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (Reid)

But was it modified by Honda to be great for illegal drag racing and ripping through canyons late at night?
What's wrong with ripping through canyons? Not that there are many canyons in NYC.

There is nothing wrong with spirited drives, IMHO.

Edit - It's my belief that Honda modified these cars so that enthusiasts can enjoy driving. For the sheer joy of driving. But again, that's just opinion.


[Modified by thk, 8:27 PM 8/30/2002]
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 09:17 PM
  #25  
vwandhondaboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Default Re: BIG rear anti-roll bar? (Warren)

No. Hollow vs Solid makes extremely little difference in terms of torsional rigidity.

If I had my pick, hollow would be it, but it's more expensive to make a bent hollow bar.

Warren
True, but there is a bending stress on the arm of the roll bar. More flex in the "arm" with a hollow bar. But it's barely noticable...I'm just nit picking.

I'd definitely go hollow.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 PM.