Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 06:52 AM
  #1  
EhSiRk92's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: franklin, ma, usa
Default turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH

turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH...you pick
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 07:13 AM
  #2  
hybridreams's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,720
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (EhSiRk92)

Man this is a tough one...I'd have to go with NA though. Yeah, turbo is bad *** but NA overall is the better choice IMO.

EDIT: This is if you have a B/H series swap though. You stock motor guys better pick turbo or nothing at all


[Modified by hybridreams, 11:14 AM 8/30/2002]
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 07:21 AM
  #3  
oldB18EF's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,712
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (EhSiRk92)

im staying n/a
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 07:47 AM
  #4  
TruePlayaz114's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: miami, fl
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (WRCivicsSiandEX)

i'm staying all motor. I like to hear my vtec when it kicks in
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 07:50 AM
  #5  
SyndicateEH's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: TBA,, Confused, ,Yemen
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (TruePlayaz114)

I voted NA, since I'm NA now... but not for too long. Car is down and ready to hank the motor and build for turbo. The costs are relatively similar but the hp is much higher on turbo. Since I don't drive my EH2 daily, i don't mind the wear n' tear that boost may do. however, my motor will be ready for it.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 07:52 AM
  #6  
SyndicateEH's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: TBA,, Confused, ,Yemen
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (TruePlayaz114)

i'm staying all motor. I like to hear my vtec when it kicks in
nothing in my opinion beats the sound of a spooled turbo and a blow off valve. i'd trade my vtec sound for that any day.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 08:32 AM
  #7  
loclowd's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: From Chicago Illinois to Palo Alto, CA, USA
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (hybridreams)

Man this is a tough one...I'd have to go with NA though. Yeah, turbo is bad *** but NA overall is the better choice IMO.

EDIT: This is if you have a B/H series swap though. You stock motor guys better pick turbo or nothing at all


[Modified by hybridreams, 11:14 AM 8/30/2002]
What he said
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 08:38 AM
  #8  
Tofurky's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 0
From: southern california, usa
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (dee-ecks)

ehhh... n/a is sort of funny. but hey you guys do what you want. if speed isn't your thing than i understand.

turbo for me
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 08:40 AM
  #9  
Pengo's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY, USA
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (dee-ecks)

NA is cool and all, but for that first time, nothing beats turbo. the spooling of the turb, the instant rush when the boost kicks in, it's unmatchable. NA can be great as well if you plan it out and know what you're doing. to either
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 08:47 AM
  #10  
bikeboy80's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 851
Likes: 1
From: PA
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (Pengo)

N/A for me

imo a turbo puts out too much power for our light hatches, i can just picture myself going through a set of tires in 6 months
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 08:49 AM
  #11  
Mrfirefox's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: NOVA, Virginia, USA
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (WRCivicsSiandEX)

Going B18 turbo when I get the money

but I have an EJ
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 11:04 AM
  #12  
SpooN Man's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 1
From: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (bikeboy80)

WTF, why even swap it then.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 11:52 AM
  #13  
Blown90hatcH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 20,006
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (SpooN Man)

Boost all the way.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 11:52 AM
  #14  
Vanilla4215's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (SpooN Man)

All honda motors were made for NA. If you want it to run turbo the right way, then you would have to be changing a whole lot of parts to make it run right. If I were to get a turbo car it would probably be something that came with a turbo from the factory, and the I'd upgrade it.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 12:04 PM
  #15  
gsrvx's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (Vanilla4215)

all motor
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 12:58 PM
  #16  
ill phil's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (RK)

Yeah, I'd have to say all motor. If you take the time to build a car up all motor, it can be pretty amazing. Going turbo is cool for some people, but if I went that route it would be on something other than Honda that has motors designed for turbo systems. I'm not knocking on Honda's with turbos since many people on this board know what they are doing and can build motors correctly for forced induction and show some really impressive time slips. Its just not my fancy. I prefer N/A But you can definitely make some power with a turbo


[Modified by ill phil, 9:59 PM 8/30/2002]
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 01:01 PM
  #17  
bretx0r's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,606
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (ill phil)

<ignorance> n/a sounds like a bunch of ******* rat motors </ignorance>

turbo all the way
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 01:03 PM
  #18  
W.Zero's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (TruePlayaz114)

i'm staying all motor. I like to hear my vtec when it kicks in
im a turbo gsr and my VTEC screams. i here my kick in louder then a all motor!
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 01:17 PM
  #19  
BROOD's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 1
From: North/West, IL
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (W.ZeroB18C1T)

I'm a turbocharger junkie so I'd prefer FI rather than n/a. But I have a great respect for well build n/a engines also.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 01:20 PM
  #20  
W.Zero's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (Vanilla4215)

All honda motors were made for NA. If you want it to run turbo the right way, then you would have to be changing a whole lot of parts to make it run right. If I were to get a turbo car it would probably be something that came with a turbo from the factory, and the I'd upgrade it.
thats not true. honda motors are made na but still turbo safe. a stock si with a drag kit will last longer then a fully built si with a drag kit. a stock mitsubishi gst stock compression is 10.2:1 i think. and they come turbo. a stock compression on a si is 10:1 non turbo but still safe to add turbo. using an si for example
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 02:13 PM
  #21  
ce's Avatar
ce
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Denmark
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (EhSiRk92)

All motor for me...
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 05:11 PM
  #22  
grafix's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: penticton, bc, canada
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (EhSiRk92)

in my opinion u can really only build an engine such as these (b/h) so much, i'm running a 96 b18b with mild mods in my 93 civ, with no dyno i'd hope i'm running sumwhere around 170@ the crank. now i am planing on building my engine, but only to support a turbo system in the future. i can only really see someone getting 250 maybe more out of a built b18c/h22a. an effective turbo system can see as much as 70% gains, where in my car, it would currently place it around 280.. if built, higher.. i can't afford to do any of the mentioned, now or most likely in the near future, its theory for the time being.. but it really depends on your wants and needs, daily driver, or fun machine, coupled with your budget.. should solve your problem.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 05:14 PM
  #23  
grafix's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: penticton, bc, canada
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (EhSiRk92)

also, more power isn't always answer, its fun, but putting the power to the groudn is sumthin to look into as well. a new vicious LSD, mouts, braces, or suspension will help ya put all ur juice to the floor..
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 08:13 PM
  #24  
Mike D's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
From: MASSHOLE
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (grafix)

never seen a 400whp all motor honda....


Mike D
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 08:30 PM
  #25  
Pworld's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
From: somewhere in INGLEWOOD chillin in tha hood, CA
Default Re: turbo vs. N/A in your EG/EH (EhSiRk92)

I would have to say turbo.....i used to want to go the NA route and i respect those who do, honestly. But when u have a turbo u can think about contending with the big boys, the cars that have turbos from factory or the V8's.

But i just say try both, after i rode in a turbo eclipse, the sound of the turbo spooling is just sick, let alone the blow off valve....im still waiting to hear a wastegate. Plus i seem to get swallowed by the sit when they accelerate.

just my 2 cents
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:07 AM.