Drag Racing Drag Racing (legal) & Associated Topics

fluidamper vs. ATi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #1  
kmaz93da's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: seattle, WA
Default fluidamper vs. ATi

debating if i need an aftermarked crank damper for turbo gsr 450-500hp rev limiter 9300.....any difference between fluidamper and ati? fluid vs elastomer

and between street and race version?/aluminum vs steel...... not using powersteering/ac too
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 02:08 PM
  #2  
A train's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 0
From: modesto, ca, usa
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

ati here!
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 02:11 PM
  #3  
JJsMotorsports's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx, bexar
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

X2 Street car has Ati and drag car has Fluidyn
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 02:12 PM
  #4  
NAH2B's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 1
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

go w/ ati

i had an issue w/ my fluidampr due to it having an aluminum hub
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #5  
Boosted_01 R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

ATI on my B-series, Nissan L28et, and soon to be on my 2JZ................heard of problems about the fluiddamper silicone in it hardening
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 02:40 PM
  #6  
PeakBoostSi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

BUMP! I want to see some more suggestions/opinions I will be in the market for one myself and i have heard more props for ATi...
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 02:55 PM
  #7  
Innes's Avatar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,226
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL, USA
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

ATI for the win -- never heard a bad thing about running the ATI damper

had it on my race car for 4+ years now and have sold a bunch of them to other racers that are running them with great success
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 03:11 PM
  #8  
Turbocivic94's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,002
Likes: 0
From: CT, USA
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

fluidampr
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 03:11 PM
  #9  
boostedcivicsir's Avatar
Mr. Badwrench
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 14,146
Likes: 2
From: stranger in a strange land
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

if you are asking if you need one, technically from a rules standpoint, yes. iirc at 11.49 you need an sfi damper.

and i cant say which one is better. i have had the fluidyne street damper on my now 9 sec car ( he hee had to say that) and it has been there since 06 on my old b16. never had any issues.

and i have plenty of friends that use the ati.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #10  
92civiceg9gsr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 927
Likes: 2
From: North Carolina
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

Either brand is so much better than oem
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 06:50 PM
  #11  
TheWickedOne's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
From: 41°39′10″N 72°23′29″W, Connecticut
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

ATI here. although i wish they updated the degreeing on the pulley, its set for V8, Maybe it was just mine..
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 07:08 PM
  #12  
slowwhitehatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

ATI here race version steel hub.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 07:25 PM
  #13  
S2Integra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 757
Likes: 2
From: NW Ohio
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

I had a question, I read an article way back when, and AEBS ran stock ITR dampers cause they said they worked better than aftermarket up to 10000rpm. I think that was back in 2001 though. Does there statement have any weight anymore?
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 09:21 PM
  #14  
civickiller's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 0
From: Kona/V-town, HI
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

fluidamper is steel now, i waited a few months for the steel one because of their issues with the aluminum ones
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 02:26 AM
  #15  
wickedEG's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Oak Harbor WA
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

fluidamper here.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 11:36 AM
  #16  
RaceCarRyne's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
From: chicago
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

x2
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 12:03 PM
  #17  
4piston's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,560
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis, USA
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

Every time I call ATI they act like I'm bothering them.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 12:03 PM
  #18  
DaveF's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 16,905
Likes: 3
From: Lansdale, PA
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

Originally Posted by TheWickedOne
ATI here. although i wish they updated the degreeing on the pulley, its set for V8, Maybe it was just mine..

my ATI has 350 degree's on it, it seems to line up with the engine. ?

we been running the ATI super damper/engines on both of our cars since 04.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 07:26 PM
  #19  
cteg6's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: bridgeport, ct, america
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

FLUIDAMPER FTMFW!!!!
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 09:18 PM
  #20  
redboost10's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 0
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

here is something that compares ati vs fluidampr

http://www.laskeyracing.com/shop/harmonics.htm
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 09:38 PM
  #21  
85mmek9's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
From: wichita, ks, usa
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

Originally Posted by cteg6
FLUIDAMPER FTMFW!!!!
+1
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 09:55 PM
  #22  
therealpoorboy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: md
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

Originally Posted by redboost10
here is something that compares ati vs fluidampr

http://www.laskeyracing.com/shop/harmonics.htm

good old American marketing. why should anyone believe what ati has to say about Fluidamper? they have both been in the market place for over 5 years and I dont think ive seen a single case where either caused a crank to break.

id say this one comes down to which one you can get the better deal on.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 09:59 PM
  #23  
therealpoorboy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: md
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

Originally Posted by S2Integra
I had a question, I read an article way back when, and AEBS ran stock ITR dampers cause they said they worked better than aftermarket up to 10000rpm. I think that was back in 2001 though. Does there statement have any weight anymore?
that was back before there were sfi models made for the b-series. and they were comparing it to the single aluminum pulleys of the day.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 10:19 PM
  #24  
redboost10's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 0
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

Originally Posted by therealpoorboy
good old American marketing. why should anyone believe what ati has to say about Fluidamper? they have both been in the market place for over 5 years and I dont think ive seen a single case where either caused a crank to break.

id say this one comes down to which one you can get the better deal on.
haha, im just passing along a website that i had found a while back
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 02:36 PM
  #25  
kmaz93da's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: seattle, WA
Default Re: fluidamper vs. ATi

more details why you chose ati or fluidamper? besides price and which one between steel and aluminum i should get?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:18 PM.