Honda Civic (2006 - 2015) 2006 - 2015 Civic Forums

Cold air intake question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 08:36 AM
  #1  
SiBlueCoupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default Cold air intake question

So my friend told me that A.E.M CAI are the best ones out there for honda's but another person told me that K&N CAI are better because they are not metal its more plastic so you can get a better air flow, but with A.E.M since its metal the air just bounces around, any ideas?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 09:25 AM
  #2  
=honda4life='s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default Re: Cold air intake question

No matter the intake, you wont see that big of a difference in HP.

AEM, Injen, Fujita...they are all basically a tube with a filter on the end of it.

Combined with a header/exhaust combo you will see no more than 10-15hp increase.

Good Luck
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #3  
FijiBlueFG2's Avatar
Road House
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Home of Champions. The Boston Massachusetts.
Default Re: Cold air intake question

Metal conducts heat/cold much better than plastic, so a metal CAI would probably yield a slight gain over a plastic one.

I believe the K&N has veins that run the length of it, which for some reason is better for airflow.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 10:56 AM
  #4  
JDMSecrets's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default Re: Cold air intake question

Most people have stated that you need a header exhaust intake combo to full take advantage of the intakes for these cars.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 11:25 AM
  #5  
SiBlueCoupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default Re: Cold air intake question

thanks!
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #6  
Janet@bisimoto's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 0
Default Re: Cold air intake question

Originally Posted by FijiBlueFG2
Metal conducts heat/cold much better than plastic, so a metal CAI would probably yield a slight gain over a plastic one...
True! But only a slight gain.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 02:41 PM
  #7  
SiBlueCoupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default Re: Cold air intake question

so it really would'nt matter on which one I should get? cause it really doesnt get a gain from it?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 02:46 PM
  #8  
FijiBlueFG2's Avatar
Road House
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Home of Champions. The Boston Massachusetts.
Default Re: Cold air intake question

I'd say...

Warm climate = Metal CAI

Cooler Climate = Plastic CAI
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 03:00 PM
  #9  
SiBlueCoupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default Re: Cold air intake question

thanks!
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2009 | 05:42 AM
  #10  
rileyrat's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Suwon, Korea
Default Re: Cold air intake question

Originally Posted by =honda4life=
No matter the intake, you wont see that big of a difference in HP.

AEM, Injen, Fujita...they are all basically a tube with a filter on the end of it.

Combined with a header/exhaust combo you will see no more than 10-15hp increase.

Good Luck
Are you kidding me? Most have hit the 215-225whp range with I/H/E. Considering most stock Si pull between 170-180whp it's closer to a 35-55whp gain. In a car that is under 3,000lbs, it makes a huge difference.

Originally Posted by FijiBlueFG2
Metal conducts heat/cold much better than plastic, so a metal CAI would probably yield a slight gain over a plastic one.

I believe the K&N has veins that run the length of it, which for some reason is better for airflow.
The veins work to help guide the air. No real effect on the long straight sections of pipe but massively helpful in the bends. Cuts down on turbulence around the bends thus helping the air get to it's destination quickly.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2009 | 06:40 AM
  #11  
=honda4life='s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default Re: Cold air intake question

Originally Posted by rileyrat
Are you kidding me? Most have hit the 215-225whp range with I/H/E. Considering most stock Si pull between 170-180whp it's closer to a 35-55whp gain. In a car that is under 3,000lbs, it makes a huge difference.
Proof? If you can show me one 06-09 Si with I/H/E making 225whp untuned then you will have clearly won this debate. I personally have never seen so much gain...atleast not without a proper tune.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2009 | 07:44 AM
  #12  
FijiBlueFG2's Avatar
Road House
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Home of Champions. The Boston Massachusetts.
Default Re: Cold air intake question

I'm not so sure about a 35whp gain. That is a little high for a NA Honda engine, already operating near its peak potential.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2009 | 12:00 AM
  #13  
rileyrat's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Suwon, Korea
Default Re: Cold air intake question

Being that no one has show proof in opposition of my statement then I see no need to go on some scavenger hunt for info when you didn't.


The absolute worst I have seen is 200.7x whp after a I/H/E swap. Some have taken it a step farther with cams and hit 240+. I'll agree that the first few to do I/H/E didn't see much past 210whp, but it seems the latest have seen, on average, 215-225 when using quality parts. You can't really expect to get there with the bottom of the barrel now can you?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 06:47 PM
  #14  
tapesyndrome's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Yup
Default Re: Cold air intake question

In my R18 I have seen a .5 increase in 1/4 times with I/E. I don't know what HP it has done but it will give you that little edge over complete stock. Not enough to know the difference just driving around town.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 07:31 PM
  #15  
RICO_'s Avatar
NO MERCY!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,914
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX, U.S.
Default Re: Cold air intake question

Originally Posted by rileyrat
Are you kidding me? Most have hit the 215-225whp range with I/H/E. Considering most stock Si pull between 170-180whp it's closer to a 35-55whp gain. In a car that is under 3,000lbs, it makes a huge difference.
With or without a tune? I gained just over 20whp with I/RH....but I don't have the exhaust yet. And I don't see how the exhaust makes a 15hp difference by itself.

I seriously doubt a full combo would produce a 55whp gain...even with the most expensive and efficient RH out there...whichever it may be. Not even close. I could MAYBE see 30whp....but 55?? Cmon man.

If I'm wrong....by all means...show me otherwise. If 55whp is possible I'd certainly like to know how it's done.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 05:22 AM
  #16  
galaxygrey13's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: san diego, ca, US
Default Re: Cold air intake question

I/H/E would gain you from 200 - 205 without a tune.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rs-xtacy
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
9
May 17, 2007 06:29 AM
Import Prelude
Honda Prelude
13
Apr 6, 2007 04:04 AM
hOOch
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
2
Nov 18, 2002 09:27 PM
E. Honda
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
9
Sep 18, 2002 06:14 AM
GSR
Acura Integra
7
Aug 27, 2001 05:46 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:51 PM.