Found this K manifold adapter plate on h22squad.com very interesting
Has anyone try using this adapter plate K manifold onto an H series head
Last edited by H2B just chillin; May 7, 2009 at 07:37 PM.
looks real good im kinda interested... as long as it doesnt push the manifold against the firewall in a eg im good.
thats bad ***!
I wonder if there's any clearance issues with the rear engine mount/bracket and other things behind the block.
Looks like this will solve the hood clearance issues with H2B swaps
agree with Jay's comment on the PRB/PRC manifold...
curious about dyno results..
I wonder if there's any clearance issues with the rear engine mount/bracket and other things behind the block.
Looks like this will solve the hood clearance issues with H2B swaps

agree with Jay's comment on the PRB/PRC manifold...
curious about dyno results..
Trending Topics
the guys at PED used a PRC k series manifold on there stroked h22 motor with an adapter simliar to that to. its printed QSD uh? they said mid range was pretty good. curious whats the price on it.
Ill buy it if Honda Tuning does an article on it and proves that it is a benefit over the Skunk 2 pro.......
This was created to benifit from one deficit... the lack of IM options available for the H.
The K and H share many characterists, this is now the second K component we've adapted to the H. Whats better than to piggy back off what the aftermarket is progressing with.

Time will definitly tell all.
The K and H share many characterists, this is now the second K component we've adapted to the H. Whats better than to piggy back off what the aftermarket is progressing with.

Time will definitly tell all.
Its a great magazine but just because there's an article about something doesnt makes it worthy over everything else.
Seth. Like the idea.
Thanks.
As much as I would love to take any credit for this, it truely was completely masterminded by Josh Grey, an affilate of QSD, and one of the few truely proving the potential of the H.
Josh used the PRC K manny first because, well it was simple around at the time it was conceived.
As much as I would love to take any credit for this, it truely was completely masterminded by Josh Grey, an affilate of QSD, and one of the few truely proving the potential of the H.
Josh used the PRC K manny first because, well it was simple around at the time it was conceived.
Same port spacing so adapting K manifolds is easy. For cams, there are some pretty decent sized Crane/Ferrea roller rocker setups floating around. You might have to run without valve seals, but it is just a little smoke
But they are old technology compared to today's 'K' standard... you know.
That and we gambled with Crane, who now appears to have closed their doors for good.
Out of curiosity, what would be the best K series manifold for the H in a boosted application? Very interested in this!!!
Only time will tell. Your goal is to find the least restrictive path whether FI or NA. Since the H and K share the same bore spacings, same valve sizes (OEM), and very close to same intake ports... I would say the best would be what the best K FI guys are using.
very interested to see what the cost would be
hopefully the cost would out weigh having to get k series tb and fuel rail also
hopefully the cost would out weigh having to get k series tb and fuel rail also
On a side note... it will be sick to see an IPS style Manifold with the charge pipe running under the engine.
Last edited by Bserious; May 8, 2009 at 01:52 PM.


