Honda Prelude All Model Preludes

tuning necessary?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 07:48 PM
  #1  
Inextricabledrvr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: RC, Ca, US
Default tuning necessary?

I recently changed my muffler from an APEXI WS to an EVO2 muffler. As well as correcting the leak in my header. About 2 or 3 years ago I got my cars A/F ratio corrected by getting it tuned.

Would you guys recommend me getting it retuned due to the new modifications I added/ccorrected. I just wanted to know if its worth it. I have listed the minor boltons below.

Current Mods: Intake, dc header w/ 2.5" collector, high flow cat, Greddy evo2 custom 2.5" piping, FPR, and pulleys.

Thanks guys
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 10:07 PM
  #2  
Kronn 98SH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Default Re: tuning necessary?

I'd get a dyno pull with A/F ratio. That should tell you if it needs adjusted.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 11:07 PM
  #3  
dagle's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,347
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA, US
Default Re: tuning necessary?

no... minimal change if any at all.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #4  
1GPlusSH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
From: Biloxi, MS, USA
Default Re: tuning necessary?

Originally Posted by dagle
no... minimal change if any at all.
ditto
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #5  
1GPlusSH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
From: Biloxi, MS, USA
Default Re: tuning necessary?

and what's with all these preludes running 2.5" exhaust??
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 02:54 PM
  #6  
Kronn 98SH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Default Re: tuning necessary?

Originally Posted by 1GPlusSH
and what's with all these preludes running 2.5" exhaust??
It's dyno-proven that the Prelude makes more power with 2.5" piping versus the stock 2.0" piping.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 03:36 PM
  #7  
kulrevon's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
From: westchester or philly, ny
Default Re: tuning necessary?

was the leak in the header before or after the O2 sensor? how bad was the leak? and how are you tuning the air/fuel?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 04:01 PM
  #8  
Inextricabledrvr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: RC, Ca, US
Default Re: tuning necessary?

Originally Posted by kulrevon
was the leak in the header before or after the O2 sensor? how bad was the leak? and how are you tuning the air/fuel?
The leak was on the top half of the header and yes the leak was pretty bad. there were leaks in 3 different places. I was planning on getting it dynotuned to correct it if necessary.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #9  
1GPlusSH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
From: Biloxi, MS, USA
Default Re: tuning necessary?

Originally Posted by Kronn 98SH
It's dyno-proven that the Prelude makes more power with 2.5" piping versus the stock 2.0" piping.
I gained horsepower when I went from 2.5" to 2.36(60mm). For a basically stock prelude, 2.5" is too much is what I was trying to say.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 04:34 PM
  #10  
gstrudler's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 2
From: Oregon City, OR, USA
Default Re: tuning necessary?

go check the threads on 3" exhausts. several people have made gains across the board going to 3" from 2.5" on mildly built n/a motors. so it makes me curious that you apparently gained power going to a smaller size.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 04:35 PM
  #11  
Kronn 98SH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Default Re: tuning necessary?

Originally Posted by 1GPlusSH
I gained horsepower when I went from 2.5" to 2.36(60mm). For a basically stock prelude, 2.5" is too much is what I was trying to say.
And what I'm trying to say is that even with a bone-stock Prelude, it still makes more power with 2.5" piping. Hell, there are dynos out there showing that 3.0" piping made power over stock. However, you might lose 1-2hp down low.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 05:05 PM
  #12  
1GPlusSH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
From: Biloxi, MS, USA
Default Re: tuning necessary?

I guess threads like that are why all these slower than stock civics are running around town with blaring exhaust. I just don't see how those who got more horsepower didn't have more interference with the exhaust waves. So how big is too big? 3" is for 300hp+ but somehow isn't hurting 170whp preludes...why not go to 4"?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 05:08 PM
  #13  
1GPlusSH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
From: Biloxi, MS, USA
Default Re: tuning necessary?

Originally Posted by Kronn 98SH
And what I'm trying to say is that even with a bone-stock Prelude, it still makes more power with 2.5" piping. Hell, there are dynos out there showing that 3.0" piping made power over stock. However, you might lose 1-2hp down low.
I'll agree with that. I have just seen a LOT of threads lately with these preludes pushing 190whp tops with 2.5" exhaust. Who knows, maybe all of them are going to get up in the power ranges where 2.5" is ideal.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 10:48 PM
  #14  
Kronn 98SH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Default Re: tuning necessary?

Originally Posted by 1GPlusSH
I'll agree with that. I have just seen a LOT of threads lately with these preludes pushing 190whp tops with 2.5" exhaust. Who knows, maybe all of them are going to get up in the power ranges where 2.5" is ideal.
It was in the FAQ. Here ya go. (and no loss down low)

https://honda-tech.com/forums/all-motor-naturally-aspirated-44/3%22-catback-exhaust-stock-jdm-h22a-dyno-2197695/
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 11:47 PM
  #15  
1GPlusSH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
From: Biloxi, MS, USA
Default Re: tuning necessary?

I would like to see a mandrel bent 3" dyno for that car. Even still, he probably still had at least 2.5" at the bends and gained. I would like to see the write ups on flow after the collector. Maybe I need to do a little more research. Thanks, Kronn.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 12:40 AM
  #16  
Kronn 98SH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Default Re: tuning necessary?

yw
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 09:16 PM
  #17  
Inextricabledrvr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: RC, Ca, US
Default Re: tuning necessary?

Originally Posted by dagle
no... minimal change if any at all.
Correct me if im wrong, but when a car is running rich does the bumper start turning black? Black I mean there are black carbon deposits all over my bumper. I made a drive to san diego yesterday and noticed my bumper was covered in soot.

The soot that covered my bumper started happening after I fixed my leaking header as well as changing my WS I muffler to an EVO2 muffler.

Tuning necessary?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 11:00 PM
  #18  
gstrudler's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 2
From: Oregon City, OR, USA
Default Re: tuning necessary?

classic symptom. yeah, it's likely hydrocarbons (unburned fuel). trying leaning it out a little.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 04:58 AM
  #19  
Inextricabledrvr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: RC, Ca, US
Default Re: tuning necessary?

Originally Posted by gstrudler
classic symptom. yeah, it's likely hydrocarbons (unburned fuel). trying leaning it out a little.
Is there anyway I can do it myself? or should I just get it dynotuned? I do have a FPR and guage, but my guage went out on me.:/
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 05:16 AM
  #20  
mattsnooz's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 0
From: Long Point Beach, ontario, canada
Default Re: tuning necessary?

LOL. Get rid of that cheap aftermarket FPR than. Better off with your stock oem fpr.

You either get a wideband and a means to register your A/F ratio or you go to a dyno shop where they have all the equipment to do it.

Widebands are expensive (for the ones that are accurate enough to base your whole tuning setup off of) so a shop might be your best option.

Your tuned already ie. have programable ecu/ chip (or however you went) so a retune/reflash shouldn't be that expensive especially if you go to the same shop. I couldn't see it being more than an hour of the shops time maybe two(hope not). It would just be fine tuning.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 10:51 PM
  #21  
Inextricabledrvr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: RC, Ca, US
Default Re: tuning necessary?

I will get it dynotuned asap. Anyone know of any Dynodays coming up in southern cali?

As for the "cheap aftermarket FPR". The shop that installed it for me told me "i needed it to get a better tune". Obviously the stock FPR is more than enough for my minor boltons. This was over 3 years ago, and now I know that the stock FPR is much better than any aftermarket. Thanks for the input

Last edited by Inextricabledrvr; Apr 26, 2009 at 10:59 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Omega Blaze
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
Jan 24, 2011 04:42 PM
$amGD3
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
12
Sep 21, 2010 10:39 AM
bokboked
Acura Integra
2
Jun 3, 2007 01:35 PM
Ninjaboi_on_X
Acura Integra
2
Nov 4, 2003 01:35 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:52 AM.