Lowered Compression Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 11:52 AM
  #1  
DulinDragons's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Waggaman, LA, United States
Default Lowered Compression Question

Im building my B18c1 for boost, but wont go forced induction until a few months after the build. Right now the compression will be 9.0:1. As far as exhaust systems go, im debating between 2.5" or 2.25" I have a set of dc 4 to1 headers going on it also with that 2.25" outlet to the cat. I just wanted to know peoples opinions with the lowered compression and would a bigger exhaust size affect anything. The engine wont be raced on the track till turbo is put on, basically a daily driver also.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 11:59 AM
  #2  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 241
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default Re: Lowered Compression Question

Compression can stay stock unless you have a specific purpose
3" exhaust is to be used. If you can only use 2.5" for now, use that.. no need for 2.25, even for NA

You're going a bit backwards on this, but you can get it cleared up.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 12:04 PM
  #3  
DulinDragons's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Waggaman, LA, United States
Default Re: Lowered Compression Question

well the motor will be fully built before hand with cp pistons, sleeves, and rods. Now i read on here that too big of an exhaust (2.5") would not provide enough back pressure and rob the motor of horse power.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 12:10 PM
  #4  
Pleiadi79's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Como, Italy
Default Re: Lowered Compression Question

yes u are right but i think on NA header config makes difference, at the moment run 2.5" and with the turbo setup a 3" is must
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 12:24 PM
  #5  
DulinDragons's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Waggaman, LA, United States
Default Re: Lowered Compression Question

ok thanks, but i will run a 3" for turbo without a doubt
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 12:52 PM
  #6  
Pleiadi79's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Como, Italy
Default Re: Lowered Compression Question

yes u must use a 3" with turbo, if u don't there's the risk of overheating the turbo due to the small section of exhaust.
What turbo?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 01:15 PM
  #7  
96 GSR-T's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
Default Re: Lowered Compression Question

Exhaust size isnt going to matter much, you took the compression out of the motor so its going to be slower NA, I dont think your header and exhaust choice is going to make much of a difference.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 05:22 PM
  #8  
DulinDragons's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Waggaman, LA, United States
Default Re: Lowered Compression Question

thanks for the advice folks. Oh and i plan on using a gt35, i used a gt2871r with my old D16 setup and i fell in love with ball bearing turbos. The lag is minimal. Last question i have is regarding fuel pumps. I going to install a new fuel tank and add a walbro 225lph pump. Im just doing a bunch of things on this build so i wont have to do it later. Would this pump seriously affect the air fuel ratio, if im using stock injectors and regulator for now until the turbo setup. I dont wanna run too rich yet.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2ndchirp
Forced Induction
6
May 17, 2009 09:15 PM
CivicDude2k4
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
18
Oct 8, 2006 09:13 PM
Nextelbuddy
Forced Induction
13
Feb 6, 2004 10:29 AM
kahren
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
2
Oct 5, 2001 12:21 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:50 PM.