JDM front lamp SAE/DOT approval problem
I have installed JDM front for my tegy and now i cant pass the lamp inspection... yeh i kno... before i ran in to this problem i didnt even heard of sae or dot...
so my question is, is there anything i can do to pass it without having it convert back to USDM front.
thanx
so my question is, is there anything i can do to pass it without having it convert back to USDM front.
thanx
to change it back i will have to change the whole front tht means weld a diffrent radiator support plus get the all the USDM parts cuz mine were damaged... if it was just lights tht i could change i would...
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 29,924
Likes: 59
From: Nowhere and Everywhere
Wow, this is the first I've heard of this ever happening before. Do you live in California? You'd think this would be more of a problem, with as strict as they are on inspections and all that crap.
Are they actually looking at the headlight beam pattern, or are they just looking at the headlight lens?
Are they actually looking at the headlight beam pattern, or are they just looking at the headlight lens?
Trending Topics
I've been pulled over many times in my jdm front itr and they have never said a thing about the front end. Is the car being blue tagged or being inspected by the CHP for being totaled? If so you should of left on the usdm front end until after the inspection because they check all the safety equipment and lights and you will not pass with the jdm front end unless you get lucky and they don't check the lights. Your best bet is to try to secure the usdm front without swapping the support out, you better have a lot of zip ties.
its not inspected by CHP i just need to get the papers for dmv tht it passes lamp brake and smog.... my front was damaged so i got JDM... i dont even have USDM parts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 29,924
Likes: 59
From: Nowhere and Everywhere
uh what? USDM 3rd gen Integras don't have "nipples" on the headlights either. Neither does my mom's 2007 Camry or my dad's 2006 Tacoma. My wife's 96 Corolla does, but I'm pretty sure newer Corollas do not.
That's what I'm thinking...the JDM lights are more "conventional" so maybe that's the first thing the inspector looked for. I don't think the mounting nipples are even used anymore. My friend in Hawaii has JDM lights on his EG and I don't think the RECON inspector even cared that there were no mounting nipples.
Maybe this inspector happened to notice the lack of nipples, or he just simply noticed no DOT stamp.
Maybe this inspector happened to notice the lack of nipples, or he just simply noticed no DOT stamp.
Check to see if there's some kind of function test they can do to see that the lights illuminate the road correctly.
I think some kit cars and older cars refitted with newer lights (ie, custom hot rods) were able to get a pass after demonstrating that their reflex reflectors and headlights passed the standards of the time.
I think some kit cars and older cars refitted with newer lights (ie, custom hot rods) were able to get a pass after demonstrating that their reflex reflectors and headlights passed the standards of the time.
nipple's? LOL
that has nothing to do with why they are not DOT/SAE approved.
jdm headlights do not require a headlight bulb shield (shield infront of the bulb). this in turn decreases visibility and also is more powerful upclose. plus japan doesnt have a dot/sae system like ours.
as for getting it passed. take to a different place and have it inspected maybe they will miss it.
that has nothing to do with why they are not DOT/SAE approved.
jdm headlights do not require a headlight bulb shield (shield infront of the bulb). this in turn decreases visibility and also is more powerful upclose. plus japan doesnt have a dot/sae system like ours.
as for getting it passed. take to a different place and have it inspected maybe they will miss it.
It is illegal to remove DOT approved (and mandated) lighting to replace with non-approved lighting.
And JDM headlamps are terrible to use in the US, as the passenger side (where light can shine up higher) is now oncoming traffic.
The only way to actually be legal (lighting wise), is to put legal headlamps back on the car. Do any of the companies making aftermarket headlamps (for example, the halo lamps) offer a DOT approved headlamp for JDM fronts?
You could try using a set of Accord headlamps. Even if they don't fit 100%, they'll have the DOT markings on them.
Of course, the car already has had the US crash standard approved front end removed and replaced with a non-legal front end, so trying to actually conform to 100% legality isn't possible. Just do the minimum necessary to pass inspection.
And there's the issue.
It is illegal to remove DOT approved (and mandated) lighting to replace with non-approved lighting.
And JDM headlamps are terrible to use in the US, as the passenger side (where light can shine up higher) is now oncoming traffic.
The only way to actually be legal (lighting wise), is to put legal headlamps back on the car. Do any of the companies making aftermarket headlamps (for example, the halo lamps) offer a DOT approved headlamp for JDM fronts?
You could try using a set of Accord headlamps. Even if they don't fit 100%, they'll have the DOT markings on them.
Of course, the car already has had the US crash standard approved front end removed and replaced with a non-legal front end, so trying to actually conform to 100% legality isn't possible. Just do the minimum necessary to pass inspection.
It is illegal to remove DOT approved (and mandated) lighting to replace with non-approved lighting.
And JDM headlamps are terrible to use in the US, as the passenger side (where light can shine up higher) is now oncoming traffic.
The only way to actually be legal (lighting wise), is to put legal headlamps back on the car. Do any of the companies making aftermarket headlamps (for example, the halo lamps) offer a DOT approved headlamp for JDM fronts?
You could try using a set of Accord headlamps. Even if they don't fit 100%, they'll have the DOT markings on them.
Of course, the car already has had the US crash standard approved front end removed and replaced with a non-legal front end, so trying to actually conform to 100% legality isn't possible. Just do the minimum necessary to pass inspection.
i think they need to fit 100%
I thought USDM lights were geared more towards shinging upwards since not all their road signs are illuminated and the upwards light would reflect off the reflective road signs (unless I'm confusing US and EU lighting standards).
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 29,924
Likes: 59
From: Nowhere and Everywhere
OE JDM HID Integra headlight cutoff:

USDM HID projector cutoff:

Most newer reflector lamps and all low-beam projector lamps in the US have a flat cutoff, with an upward flare or step oriented toward the right (passenger) side of the car, off to the side of the road. This helps direct more light off to the side of the road, which can help with signs, but headlights should NEVER be aimed with the cutoff rising at an upward angle. It should always be directed slightly below horizontal. The federal US requirement is 2.1 inches of fall per 25 feet in front of the car.
Last edited by PatrickGSR94; Jan 30, 2009 at 07:19 PM.
Quick question. My car got salvaged after damage from a theft attempt, and I've yet to get my car's brake and light test. In the the time I've put on a JDM front and didn't think about not passing the inspection.
So my question is, who does the inspection? If I go to a shop that I know, can they just sign off that my car is cool, or will someone at the DMV/CHP do it?
Another off topic question, Is there any way to reverse the cut off with the JDM headlights so you can aim on the right side of the road? Thanks.
So my question is, who does the inspection? If I go to a shop that I know, can they just sign off that my car is cool, or will someone at the DMV/CHP do it?
Another off topic question, Is there any way to reverse the cut off with the JDM headlights so you can aim on the right side of the road? Thanks.






