h-t's opinion on the 675
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,290
Likes: 1
From: spinning DnB till your head explodes,jersey/philly
h-t's opinion on the 675
well folks i seriously have a problem with keeping a bike for a period of time. i know its a bad habit but i like to try out new stuff. id like to get some opinions from people that have or ridden a 675 daytona.
i have an 07 600rr and really dont have any complaints at all. fast, very light and 2 years in a row for 600 of the year so you know its a good bike.
i also like having something different, something you dont see on the road everyday, thats why i always liked fighters cause there not the norm.
anyway it would be nice to get some opinions from people that have ridden a 600rr and 675 or owned either one just to get some feedback. if i keep the 600rr plans are to paint it white and get the wheels powdercoated gold. if i sell it i want this.
or keep this
i have an 07 600rr and really dont have any complaints at all. fast, very light and 2 years in a row for 600 of the year so you know its a good bike.
i also like having something different, something you dont see on the road everyday, thats why i always liked fighters cause there not the norm.
anyway it would be nice to get some opinions from people that have ridden a 600rr and 675 or owned either one just to get some feedback. if i keep the 600rr plans are to paint it white and get the wheels powdercoated gold. if i sell it i want this.
or keep this
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
From: CA, United States
Re: h-t's opinion on the 675 (The Hooligan)
Im about 6'2"-6'3" at 180 and found it to be pretty cramped. I've been wanting one since they make awesome midrange power but I couldnt ride it daily.
I would buy one as a track only bike if I was looking for one though.
I would buy one as a track only bike if I was looking for one though.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 1
From: connecticut, USA
Re: h-t's opinion on the 675 (The Hooligan)
im also intrested in a triumph. i have an sv650s now and a looking for something diffrent for a next bike. i like the 675, and the speed triple
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,587
Likes: 1
From: Land of the SkanKz Cali 562, Ca, USA
Re: h-t's opinion on the 675 (The Hooligan)
i love mine! all the torque you want is right there! and it pulls all the way thru! its light weight and responsive so transition from left to right is soo easy. ive had mine for about a year and a half now and i dont think im going to get any other bike. when i get on my buddys bikes it just doesnt feel the same. theres no low end on them at all. im 5'7 so im pretty much tippy toe.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: germantown, md
Both bikes are very light and nimble. The 675 has more grunt through the power band though. In addition the rider sits higher and more aggressively on the daytona. I'd definitely much rather have the 600rr as the "all around bike" compared to the 675. The 675 would be like an exotic toy for the track or something, for me at least.
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Gbg, Pa, USA
Re: (chau003)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by chau003 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Both bikes are very light and nimble. The 675 has more grunt through the power band though. In addition the rider sits higher and more aggressively on the daytona. I'd definitely much rather have the 600rr as the "all around bike" compared to the 675. The 675 would be like an exotic toy for the track or something, for me at least. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Agreed. You cant miss on using honda for an all purpose street bike. They spend time tuning everything to be the "all around" bike for street and track duty.
My opinion on the 675 is one sound. Mehh tied with a shoulder shrug. Its ok but I found it a little raw. Stiff as hell suspension for no need and the rake angle is rediculous. The power really did not impress me for the money. My old 636 would walk one down low to up top. Again though the 636 was far from stock.
Compared even to a 750 they dont feel like torque monsters that people make them out to be. Also I know around here (Pittsburgh area) parts take a good while to get here after you order them from a dealer (our dealer does not stock much) at least what my buddy said.
My one buddy with a green street triple 675 is having some wiring issues as well and its brand new with maybe 1200 miles.
BOO for there so called build quality.
I vote 600rr FTW
Agreed. You cant miss on using honda for an all purpose street bike. They spend time tuning everything to be the "all around" bike for street and track duty.
My opinion on the 675 is one sound. Mehh tied with a shoulder shrug. Its ok but I found it a little raw. Stiff as hell suspension for no need and the rake angle is rediculous. The power really did not impress me for the money. My old 636 would walk one down low to up top. Again though the 636 was far from stock.
Compared even to a 750 they dont feel like torque monsters that people make them out to be. Also I know around here (Pittsburgh area) parts take a good while to get here after you order them from a dealer (our dealer does not stock much) at least what my buddy said.
My one buddy with a green street triple 675 is having some wiring issues as well and its brand new with maybe 1200 miles.
BOO for there so called build quality.I vote 600rr FTW
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,290
Likes: 1
From: spinning DnB till your head explodes,jersey/philly
Re: (b20turboic)
you make some pretty good points. i have a triumph dealer about 30 minutes away but they are really lame. i guess ill probally stick with the rr for awhile and if another bike pops up will see what happens. i should stop thinking about the 675 and hunt down a downed 900rr or an air cooled gsxr, still trying to make another fighter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,633
Likes: 1
From: Off THE 60, Between THE 605 and THE 57
My thoughts on the 675:
1. Nothing handles like it. Nothing turns quicker. Rear suspension is crap from the factory, but that's an easy fix (buy an elka, penske, ohlins w/ the right spring rate).
2. Motor is ultra-smooth. It doesn't have that 2-part powerband that the I4's have--it's a linear powerband with pretty flat torque curve throughout the revs. The downside to this is that at 9000 rpm, you may wonder where the power is--but when you look at the speedo it answers your question. I think it makes it easier to ride since you don't need to rev the **** out of it, but if you like going to ludicrous speed on the top end, you'll like an I4 better. It's not as brutal as a twin in the mid-range, but it doesn't run out of steam at the top end either.
3. Some people find the body positioning to be uncomfortable, but as you get used to it, it's not that bad. The main thing to get used to is the rake, and smashing your nuts on the tank, but it's a good "built-in-tool" for keeping your nuts off the tank. I've done some long rides on a 675 and it's not impossible. If you have short legs, the very high saddle height may bother you, but it's all about the 1-cheek-sneak.
4. Ground clearance is great. Rider and feet sit so high up that you can get the thing practically sideways without dragging a hard part. Rearsets aren't as crucial on this bike as they are on other bikes.
5. Reliability has been hit and miss. It's not the nightmare that non-owners say it is, but it's not a honda-(oil changes and chain lubes for 50,000 miles). Some of the more common problems with this bike are the battery (very small, and very finicky, needs a trickle charger), R/R, Exhaust butterfly system, CCT (APE makes a manual unit). FWIW, neither of my 675's have had major problems with anything except my 2nd one, which had a low battery. a few hours on the charger fixed it.
6. The newer bikes don't have the same fuel pump relay problems that the earlier 675's had, which made using the kill switch a no-no. So if you're buying a SE, you should be fine.
7. Parts are generally available through a triumph dealership, though some of the more exotic parts require more lead time. For the VERY exotic parts (like complete OEM wiring harnesses) there's an indefinite lead time, but, how many people destroy a wiring harness? Secondary parts market (aka used parts) isn't as huge as it is for the Big4, but there's a good # of bikes being parted out on the boards. Aftermarket parts are available, but can be pricier than they are for a big4 600.
I've DD'd a 675 and found it to be a pretty good city bike. especially with the completely oversprung rear shock gone, it's actually a nice ride. I'd say 5 essential mods every 675 needs are:
1. rear shock
2. exhaust (leo vince full system ftw)
3. Tuneboy (fuel map tuning w/o a piggyback like the pc3)
4. stomp grips or tech specs
5. OEM gel seat
1. Nothing handles like it. Nothing turns quicker. Rear suspension is crap from the factory, but that's an easy fix (buy an elka, penske, ohlins w/ the right spring rate).
2. Motor is ultra-smooth. It doesn't have that 2-part powerband that the I4's have--it's a linear powerband with pretty flat torque curve throughout the revs. The downside to this is that at 9000 rpm, you may wonder where the power is--but when you look at the speedo it answers your question. I think it makes it easier to ride since you don't need to rev the **** out of it, but if you like going to ludicrous speed on the top end, you'll like an I4 better. It's not as brutal as a twin in the mid-range, but it doesn't run out of steam at the top end either.
3. Some people find the body positioning to be uncomfortable, but as you get used to it, it's not that bad. The main thing to get used to is the rake, and smashing your nuts on the tank, but it's a good "built-in-tool" for keeping your nuts off the tank. I've done some long rides on a 675 and it's not impossible. If you have short legs, the very high saddle height may bother you, but it's all about the 1-cheek-sneak.
4. Ground clearance is great. Rider and feet sit so high up that you can get the thing practically sideways without dragging a hard part. Rearsets aren't as crucial on this bike as they are on other bikes.
5. Reliability has been hit and miss. It's not the nightmare that non-owners say it is, but it's not a honda-(oil changes and chain lubes for 50,000 miles). Some of the more common problems with this bike are the battery (very small, and very finicky, needs a trickle charger), R/R, Exhaust butterfly system, CCT (APE makes a manual unit). FWIW, neither of my 675's have had major problems with anything except my 2nd one, which had a low battery. a few hours on the charger fixed it.
6. The newer bikes don't have the same fuel pump relay problems that the earlier 675's had, which made using the kill switch a no-no. So if you're buying a SE, you should be fine.
7. Parts are generally available through a triumph dealership, though some of the more exotic parts require more lead time. For the VERY exotic parts (like complete OEM wiring harnesses) there's an indefinite lead time, but, how many people destroy a wiring harness? Secondary parts market (aka used parts) isn't as huge as it is for the Big4, but there's a good # of bikes being parted out on the boards. Aftermarket parts are available, but can be pricier than they are for a big4 600.
I've DD'd a 675 and found it to be a pretty good city bike. especially with the completely oversprung rear shock gone, it's actually a nice ride. I'd say 5 essential mods every 675 needs are:
1. rear shock
2. exhaust (leo vince full system ftw)
3. Tuneboy (fuel map tuning w/o a piggyback like the pc3)
4. stomp grips or tech specs
5. OEM gel seat
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: South OC, CA, USA
Re: (bad-monkey)
couldnt say the same stuff better my self. The sound is awsome.... and with all his upgrade recomendation?? I would definately get the tank grips... the seat is so skinny it makes your ***** drive through the tank during braking and such. Oh you might have some sore wrist for the first week or so.... Then I would look at some new bars if your riding streets. I loved it so much I bought a 2nd one my self..... street preped and the other track preped. The 09 is comming; might want to consider that.
The 09 is comming; might want to consider that.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: EastSide, PA, USA
Re: (b20turboic)
Well I apologize for the thread jacking people.BUt CHAU003 I want to purchase your fogs from your Prelude.I had no other way of contacting you besides this.
Once again Im sorry for interupting this thread. CHAU003 my aim Fredo92BB2.
Once again Im sorry for interupting this thread. CHAU003 my aim Fredo92BB2.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,077
Likes: 0
From: small town, WI, USA
Re: h-t's opinion on the 675 (The Hooligan)
buy Italian! a used 04-07 RSV Mille R is the best bang for your buck. 3 cylinders are cool, but nothing compares to the grunt and savage nature of a twin. PLus I personally garuunnntee you WONT see another rsv or aprilia for that matter on the road at the same time. 04's go used for around $7k and now is a good time to buy. 
btw, I'm a bit biased cuz a own a 01' RSV. I will tell you though, it is the best bike I've ever riden.
My personal opinion on the 675 is that its not only the sexiest looking middleweight out there, but the extra torque from the +75cc's and the 3 banger is a big improvment over the raspy nature of inline 4's. Handling will be comparable for sure, so I don't think that should be an issue, unless you're a hardcore racer...then the cbr probably has a bit of a leg up in the handling department from what I've read. I'd say you can't go wrong with the triumph, but then again for the money there's a lot better options out there.
btw, I'm a bit biased cuz a own a 01' RSV. I will tell you though, it is the best bike I've ever riden.
My personal opinion on the 675 is that its not only the sexiest looking middleweight out there, but the extra torque from the +75cc's and the 3 banger is a big improvment over the raspy nature of inline 4's. Handling will be comparable for sure, so I don't think that should be an issue, unless you're a hardcore racer...then the cbr probably has a bit of a leg up in the handling department from what I've read. I'd say you can't go wrong with the triumph, but then again for the money there's a lot better options out there.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,290
Likes: 1
From: spinning DnB till your head explodes,jersey/philly
Re: h-t's opinion on the 675 (Mr.Chow)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr.Chow »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">buy Italian! a used 04-07 RSV Mille R is the best bang for your buck. 3 cylinders are cool, but nothing compares to the grunt and savage nature of a twin. PLus I personally garuunnntee you WONT see another rsv or aprilia for that matter on the road at the same time. 04's go used for around $7k and now is a good time to buy.
btw, I'm a bit biased cuz a own a 01' RSV. I will tell you though, it is the best bike I've ever riden.
My personal opinion on the 675 is that its not only the sexiest looking middleweight out there, but the extra torque from the +75cc's and the 3 banger is a big improvment over the raspy nature of inline 4's. Handling will be comparable for sure, so I don't think that should be an issue, unless you're a hardcore racer...then the cbr probably has a bit of a leg up in the handling department from what I've read. I'd say you can't go wrong with the triumph, but then again for the money there's a lot better options out there. </TD></TR></TABLE>
well ive thought about getting a twin, either an rc51 or mille but ive never ridden a big twin before. i rode a superhawk once and didnt like it at all. i thought id like the grumble and vibes from the twin, but i guess im more of a fan of screamin inline 4s. hopefully soon ill get to take a newer twin out, say a ducati or aprilia to get a better idea.
im so used to riding a 385-390lb lil 600 that im not sure if i wanna ride anything bigger anymore. im still recovering from leukemia/bone marrow transplant so im pretty weak and i can just about handle the 600rr, parking/ putting on rear stand. i tried putting my bros zrx1100 on the rear stand and i couldnt get that pig up in the air,lol.
anyway i figured the 675 would be a good choice for the next bike, as its light and has a nice powerband. ill consider one if i find one on craigslist for a decent price. i jus think i have a good bike with a good amount of money into it so will see what happens over winter time.
like i said before, i really wanna build another fighter
btw, I'm a bit biased cuz a own a 01' RSV. I will tell you though, it is the best bike I've ever riden.
My personal opinion on the 675 is that its not only the sexiest looking middleweight out there, but the extra torque from the +75cc's and the 3 banger is a big improvment over the raspy nature of inline 4's. Handling will be comparable for sure, so I don't think that should be an issue, unless you're a hardcore racer...then the cbr probably has a bit of a leg up in the handling department from what I've read. I'd say you can't go wrong with the triumph, but then again for the money there's a lot better options out there. </TD></TR></TABLE>
well ive thought about getting a twin, either an rc51 or mille but ive never ridden a big twin before. i rode a superhawk once and didnt like it at all. i thought id like the grumble and vibes from the twin, but i guess im more of a fan of screamin inline 4s. hopefully soon ill get to take a newer twin out, say a ducati or aprilia to get a better idea.
im so used to riding a 385-390lb lil 600 that im not sure if i wanna ride anything bigger anymore. im still recovering from leukemia/bone marrow transplant so im pretty weak and i can just about handle the 600rr, parking/ putting on rear stand. i tried putting my bros zrx1100 on the rear stand and i couldnt get that pig up in the air,lol.
anyway i figured the 675 would be a good choice for the next bike, as its light and has a nice powerband. ill consider one if i find one on craigslist for a decent price. i jus think i have a good bike with a good amount of money into it so will see what happens over winter time.
like i said before, i really wanna build another fighter
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,290
Likes: 1
From: spinning DnB till your head explodes,jersey/philly
Re: (bad-monkey)
i remember graphiteaccord showing a picture of his on the scale and i believe it was like 385, but he put that zard gp style full system on that really cuts some weight.
ive taken off all undertail crap, stock turnsignals, reflectors, mirrors, put on a cf slipon, footpegs, took off servo motor/egcv valve, chainguard/sprocket cover.
i know the bike is 410 wet so with these parts off id likw to be under 400 gonna have to the scrapyard or concrete plant to weigh this badboy. hoping to do a 520 conversion and lighter wheels in the future.
ive taken off all undertail crap, stock turnsignals, reflectors, mirrors, put on a cf slipon, footpegs, took off servo motor/egcv valve, chainguard/sprocket cover.
i know the bike is 410 wet so with these parts off id likw to be under 400
gonna have to the scrapyard or concrete plant to weigh this badboy. hoping to do a 520 conversion and lighter wheels in the future.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,633
Likes: 1
From: Off THE 60, Between THE 605 and THE 57
Re: (The Hooligan)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by The Hooligan »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i remember graphiteaccord showing a picture of his on the scale and i believe it was like 385, but he put that zard gp style full system on that really cuts some weight.
ive taken off all undertail crap, stock turnsignals, reflectors, mirrors, put on a cf slipon, footpegs, took off servo motor/egcv valve, chainguard/sprocket cover.
i know the bike is 410 wet so with these parts off id likw to be under 400 gonna have to the scrapyard or concrete plant to weigh this badboy. hoping to do a 520 conversion and lighter wheels in the future.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I ended up buying GA's exhaust off of him. It's at least 5-7 lbs lighter than the stock undertail exh. It's not all that pretty though
. My suspension guy laughed at me the other day in the shop, asking me if i pulled that thing off of a civic, lol.
With no headlights, undertail, emissions crap, and other unnecessary stuff pulled off, i've shaved a good amount of weight. I'd love a set of marchesini's but the 675 wheels are pretty light already (maybe 1-2 lbs heavier than some Aluminum marchies) so it's not really much return on investment.
ive taken off all undertail crap, stock turnsignals, reflectors, mirrors, put on a cf slipon, footpegs, took off servo motor/egcv valve, chainguard/sprocket cover.
i know the bike is 410 wet so with these parts off id likw to be under 400
gonna have to the scrapyard or concrete plant to weigh this badboy. hoping to do a 520 conversion and lighter wheels in the future.</TD></TR></TABLE>I ended up buying GA's exhaust off of him. It's at least 5-7 lbs lighter than the stock undertail exh. It's not all that pretty though
. My suspension guy laughed at me the other day in the shop, asking me if i pulled that thing off of a civic, lol.With no headlights, undertail, emissions crap, and other unnecessary stuff pulled off, i've shaved a good amount of weight. I'd love a set of marchesini's but the 675 wheels are pretty light already (maybe 1-2 lbs heavier than some Aluminum marchies) so it's not really much return on investment.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,290
Likes: 1
From: spinning DnB till your head explodes,jersey/philly
Re: (bad-monkey)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bad-monkey »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I ended up buying GA's exhaust off of him. It's at least 5-7 lbs lighter than the stock undertail exh. It's not all that pretty though. My suspension guy laughed at me the other day in the shop, asking me if i pulled that thing off of a civic, lol.
With no headlights, undertail, emissions crap, and other unnecessary stuff pulled off, i've shaved a good amount of weight. I'd love a set of marchesini's but the 675 wheels are pretty light already (maybe 1-2 lbs heavier than some Aluminum marchies) so it's not really much return on investment.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
did he sell his 675 or get a different exhaust setup? when i was looking at 675s, i priced a full zard system it was like 1500 bills. pretty expensive, maybe you can get them cheaper.
I ended up buying GA's exhaust off of him. It's at least 5-7 lbs lighter than the stock undertail exh. It's not all that pretty though
. My suspension guy laughed at me the other day in the shop, asking me if i pulled that thing off of a civic, lol.With no headlights, undertail, emissions crap, and other unnecessary stuff pulled off, i've shaved a good amount of weight. I'd love a set of marchesini's but the 675 wheels are pretty light already (maybe 1-2 lbs heavier than some Aluminum marchies) so it's not really much return on investment.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
did he sell his 675 or get a different exhaust setup? when i was looking at 675s, i priced a full zard system it was like 1500 bills. pretty expensive, maybe you can get them cheaper.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,633
Likes: 1
From: Off THE 60, Between THE 605 and THE 57
Re: (AdeJong 03)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AdeJong 03 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">how has triumphs bankruptcy affected servicing and dealerships?
i never really looked into it</TD></TR></TABLE>
no issues i've seen. but my current bike it out of warranty so i'm just using the parts desk now. People are still having warranty and dealership work done, to varying degrees of satisfaction, but that's unrelated to bankruptcy.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by the hooligan »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">did he sell his 675 or get a different exhaust setup? when i was looking at 675s, i priced a full zard system it was like 1500 bills. pretty expensive, maybe you can get them cheaper.</TD></TR></TABLE>
he parted out the 675 I think. All of the nice exhausts are north of a G. You can get a custom lowboy ($800) from Hordpower.com, who has done a lot of dyno testing on the 675 and has gotten good results (~128 whp!)
My exhaust is a modified stock header that's had a spool piece welded on after the collector, which removes the CAT and the EXBV.
i never really looked into it</TD></TR></TABLE>
no issues i've seen. but my current bike it out of warranty so i'm just using the parts desk now. People are still having warranty and dealership work done, to varying degrees of satisfaction, but that's unrelated to bankruptcy.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by the hooligan »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">did he sell his 675 or get a different exhaust setup? when i was looking at 675s, i priced a full zard system it was like 1500 bills. pretty expensive, maybe you can get them cheaper.</TD></TR></TABLE>
he parted out the 675 I think. All of the nice exhausts are north of a G. You can get a custom lowboy ($800) from Hordpower.com, who has done a lot of dyno testing on the 675 and has gotten good results (~128 whp!)
My exhaust is a modified stock header that's had a spool piece welded on after the collector, which removes the CAT and the EXBV.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post