My Vortech typeR crx
http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=OcDFoSHcD5k
http://videos.streetfire.net/v...9.htm


Modified by dancrxsir at 11:31 AM 10/20/2008
http://videos.streetfire.net/v...9.htm


Modified by dancrxsir at 11:31 AM 10/20/2008
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mabbiker »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i know its turbo but how much you boosten cus i mean its only making 255hp and thats low</TD></TR></TABLE>
vortech = supercharger
those numbers are average for a steet sc setup. power on tap.
vortech = supercharger
those numbers are average for a steet sc setup. power on tap.
Trending Topics
265whp 175tq
can't say it's the cheapest way to get these number.....vortech kit cost over 4000$
and I'm not a fan of turbo so I took the supercharged way!
I reallly enjoy that rex now!
this winter I'm gonna change the SIR crank pulley for CRV... so I can get around 8-9 psi
can't say it's the cheapest way to get these number.....vortech kit cost over 4000$
and I'm not a fan of turbo so I took the supercharged way!
I reallly enjoy that rex now!
this winter I'm gonna change the SIR crank pulley for CRV... so I can get around 8-9 psi
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by salman »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The easiest way to produce 250whps...
cheapest too..
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Definitely not the cheapest, or the easiest. I can't imagine that vortech blower was all that easy to fit in that engine bay LOL.
Numbers aren't too bad. Friend of mine used to have a procharger in on his B16 that made 303whp. Linear powerband was pretty neat to feel in a Honda like that.
cheapest too..
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Definitely not the cheapest, or the easiest. I can't imagine that vortech blower was all that easy to fit in that engine bay LOL.
Numbers aren't too bad. Friend of mine used to have a procharger in on his B16 that made 303whp. Linear powerband was pretty neat to feel in a Honda like that.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SovXietday »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Definitely not the cheapest, or the easiest. I can't imagine that vortech blower was all that easy to fit in that engine bay LOL.
Numbers aren't too bad. Friend of mine used to have a procharger in on his B16 that made 303whp. Linear powerband was pretty neat to feel in a Honda like that.</TD></TR></TABLE>
it fit tight in EF's engine bay!
hope to get little bit more power adding 4-5 psi this winter with crx crank pulley upgrade
Definitely not the cheapest, or the easiest. I can't imagine that vortech blower was all that easy to fit in that engine bay LOL.
Numbers aren't too bad. Friend of mine used to have a procharger in on his B16 that made 303whp. Linear powerband was pretty neat to feel in a Honda like that.</TD></TR></TABLE>
it fit tight in EF's engine bay!
hope to get little bit more power adding 4-5 psi this winter with crx crank pulley upgrade
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SovXietday »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Definitely not the cheapest, or the easiest. I can't imagine that vortech blower was all that easy to fit in that engine bay LOL.
Numbers aren't too bad. Friend of mine used to have a procharger in on his B16 that made 303whp. Linear powerband was pretty neat to feel in a Honda like that.</TD></TR></TABLE>
linear? don't you mean progressive since the boost is built in direct reference to rpm?
Definitely not the cheapest, or the easiest. I can't imagine that vortech blower was all that easy to fit in that engine bay LOL.
Numbers aren't too bad. Friend of mine used to have a procharger in on his B16 that made 303whp. Linear powerband was pretty neat to feel in a Honda like that.</TD></TR></TABLE>
linear? don't you mean progressive since the boost is built in direct reference to rpm?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blinx9900 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
linear? don't you mean progressive since the boost is built in direct reference to rpm?</TD></TR></TABLE>
You're both trying to say the same thing
linear? don't you mean progressive since the boost is built in direct reference to rpm?</TD></TR></TABLE>
You're both trying to say the same thing
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SovXietday »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Linear powerband was pretty neat to feel in a Honda like that.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blinx9900 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
linear? don't you mean progressive since the boost is built in direct reference to rpm?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I think all the JRSC Hondas will produce a near flat torque curve line and a completely linear HP curve similar to a Vortech anything beyond 3000-4000RPM. And so does any higher revving all motor Honda which does the same
Nothing too special IMO because that's the ideal powerband. I am just surprised that this particular Vortech setup didn't have a rising torque curve though, and there must be a slight bottleneck somewhere in the setup.
Linear powerband was pretty neat to feel in a Honda like that.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blinx9900 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
linear? don't you mean progressive since the boost is built in direct reference to rpm?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I think all the JRSC Hondas will produce a near flat torque curve line and a completely linear HP curve similar to a Vortech anything beyond 3000-4000RPM. And so does any higher revving all motor Honda which does the same
Nothing too special IMO because that's the ideal powerband. I am just surprised that this particular Vortech setup didn't have a rising torque curve though, and there must be a slight bottleneck somewhere in the setup.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SovXietday »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Definitely not the cheapest, or the easiest. I can't imagine that vortech blower was all that easy to fit in that engine bay LOL.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
hMM, making power through Froce induction is easy, as small increment in boost will result in big hp gain,
I thought that SC setup are for 2.5 to 3k max never new that Vortech is that expensive.
Any ways, making 250whps out of A Supercharged motor is easy then making through NA isnt it ??
Modified by salman at 12:51 AM 10/20/2008
Definitely not the cheapest, or the easiest. I can't imagine that vortech blower was all that easy to fit in that engine bay LOL.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
hMM, making power through Froce induction is easy, as small increment in boost will result in big hp gain,
I thought that SC setup are for 2.5 to 3k max never new that Vortech is that expensive.
Any ways, making 250whps out of A Supercharged motor is easy then making through NA isnt it ??
Modified by salman at 12:51 AM 10/20/2008
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by channy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Looks good man
, here's mine:
</TD></TR></TABLE>
what kind of power are you making
in the dyno above i think something isn't right with his setup im thinking the tq should continue to rise and maybe get flat at the end of his rpms
because with that system the more revs the more boost
, here's mine:
</TD></TR></TABLE>what kind of power are you making
in the dyno above i think something isn't right with his setup im thinking the tq should continue to rise and maybe get flat at the end of his rpms
because with that system the more revs the more boost
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by spoolin turbo s »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The more revs the more boost</TD></TR></TABLE>
Its a fact.
I am also planning to install one, very soon. dose any one have ever tried, toyota Sc12 or Sc14 on there hondas. ?
Its a fact.
I am also planning to install one, very soon. dose any one have ever tried, toyota Sc12 or Sc14 on there hondas. ?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mabbiker »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i know its turbo but how much you boosten cus i mean its only making 255hp and thats low</TD></TR></TABLE>
this is priceless...
this is priceless...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by channy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Looks good man
, here's mine:
</TD></TR></TABLE>
nice to see an other EF/CRX with that kit!!
, here's mine:
</TD></TR></TABLE>nice to see an other EF/CRX with that kit!!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blinx9900 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">linear? don't you mean progressive since the boost is built in direct reference to rpm?</TD></TR></TABLE>
No, HP is almost always linear on the SC setups. Flat torque curves through huge RPM increments. Building boost with RPMs for whatever reason never seems to affect that, I'm not entirely sure why.
Essentially makes the car feel like you have an accord V6 engine under the hood, I'm used to the 150 wtq increase in 1000rpm approach.
No, HP is almost always linear on the SC setups. Flat torque curves through huge RPM increments. Building boost with RPMs for whatever reason never seems to affect that, I'm not entirely sure why.
Essentially makes the car feel like you have an accord V6 engine under the hood, I'm used to the 150 wtq increase in 1000rpm approach.


