Honda S2000 Honda S2000

-2.5 to -3.5 rear camber

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 11:35 AM
  #1  
Type_D's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber

Just wanted to know if i would be able to run these spec without a camber kit. and how bad is the tire wear on these setting? i understand that camber setting is not the main cause of tire wear but how long do you guys last? Also does having this high negative camber put alot of stress on other parts?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 12:18 PM
  #2  
SlammedDC2teg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 2
From: SSF, CA
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (Type_D)

Im running that on my S2k on falken azenie RT 615s. I get about 10k out of the rear tires. The front last longer. And yes you can run those settings without a camber kit.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 12:41 PM
  #3  
Type_D's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (SlammedDC2teg)

if you don't mind can you tell me your offset for your rear rims?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #4  
Black S2K's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,268
Likes: 0
From: dippin traffic on i95, pa
Default

stock ap1 rims runing that setting tires lasted around 10k Toyo Proxy 4s
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 08:47 PM
  #5  
Chris.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Order of Merit
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,336
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default Re: (Black S2K)

you're running that much camber dave? those things are probably sunken in like battleships haha
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 06:15 AM
  #6  
B serious's Avatar
Cool Cool Island Breezes. BOY-EE
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 9
From: TRILLINOIS....WAY downtown, jerky.
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (Type_D)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Type_D &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Just wanted to know if i would be able to run these spec without a camber kit. and how bad is the tire wear on these setting? i understand that camber setting is not the main cause of tire wear but how long do you guys last? Also does having this high negative camber put alot of stress on other parts?</TD></TR></TABLE>

The tire wear may be noticeable depending on how you drive it. Also, AP1s will generally show more wear because they use more toe in in the rear.

You failed to mention anything about your car....

My first question is why are you thinking about running -3.5 deg of camber?

Do you track this car at all? I'm going to guess this is being done for wheel fitment or the ability to ride hard parked.

It will put more stress on your upper ball joints. I'm not sure how much shorter the lifespan of your upper ball joints will be, but it will be shorter than normal.

I'm running -2.5 front and -3 rear with 225/45/17s and 255/40/17s. 17X7.5,17X9 +45 all the way around. Front fenders have the little tabs for the liners folded in, and the rear fenders have the lip folded in adn the bumper screw relocated. No rubbing issues ever. I've been to the track and driven it as hard as possible. Never rubbed.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 06:29 AM
  #7  
Type_D's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (B serious)

Thank you B serious. YOu basically answered my question lol. It was due to fitment issues. Everytime i drive the car hard it would always rub the rear. The front are the safe offset the rear i have agressive offset. I see that yours is +45. I have +44 at the rear. Im not sure if different rims play a different role in offset but yea. but i dunno i still think -3.5 is to much. did you ever try -2 or -2.5 with rolled fender + bolt relocate? does it still rub?
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 06:36 AM
  #8  
B serious's Avatar
Cool Cool Island Breezes. BOY-EE
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 9
From: TRILLINOIS....WAY downtown, jerky.
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (Type_D)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Type_D &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Thank you B serious. YOu basically answered my question lol. It was due to fitment issues. Everytime i drive the car hard it would always rub the rear. The front are the safe offset the rear i have agressive offset. I see that yours is +45. I have +44 at the rear. Im not sure if different rims play a different role in offset but yea. but i dunno i still think -3.5 is to much. did you ever try -2 or -2.5 with rolled fender + bolt relocate? does it still rub?</TD></TR></TABLE>

What width are your wheels? What tire size? How low is your car? What is it lowered on? What year is your car? Type as many details as possible. help me help you.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 06:50 AM
  #9  
Chris.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Order of Merit
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,336
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (Type_D)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Type_D &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Thank you B serious. YOu basically answered my question lol. It was due to fitment issues. Everytime i drive the car hard it would always rub the rear. The front are the safe offset the rear i have agressive offset. I see that yours is +45. I have +44 at the rear. Im not sure if different rims play a different role in offset but yea. but i dunno i still think -3.5 is to much. did you ever try -2 or -2.5 with rolled fender + bolt relocate? does it still rub?</TD></TR></TABLE>

when i first lowered my s2k i had 2.5 degrees in the rear, it rubbed on just about every bump . with 3.25 degrees it only rubs on the rear bumper bolt on big dips/bumps. btw i have a 17x9 +40 with 255/40-17 tires
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #10  
Type_D's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (Chris.)

Chris, Do you think i'll be able to get away with -2.5 or even 3? I don't really want to go more than -3 rear camber. You have +40 and i have +47 think i can get away with it with -2.5 or -2.75?
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 12:57 AM
  #11  
- BSeRiouS -'s Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: San Deeezy, CA, USA
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (Chris.)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chris. &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

when i first lowered my s2k i had 2.5 degrees in the rear, it rubbed on just about every bump . with 3.25 degrees it only rubs on the rear bumper bolt on big dips/bumps. btw i have a 17x9 +40 with 255/40-17 tires</TD></TR></TABLE>

That is an easy fit

If you haven't done so already, roll your rear 1/4's flat. Relocate your rear bumper bolt, and cut a piece out of your rear bumper lip.

You are rubbing on the rear bumper bolt and rear bumper guaranteed.

With the -3.25, you will clear night and day if you just do the things above
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 05:41 AM
  #12  
Chris.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Order of Merit
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,336
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (- BSeRiouS -)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by - BSeRiouS - &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If you haven't done so already, roll your rear 1/4's flat. Relocate your rear bumper bolt, and cut a piece out of your rear bumper lip.

You are rubbing on the rear bumper bolt and rear bumper guaranteed.

With the -3.25, you will clear night and day if you just do the things above </TD></TR></TABLE>

rear 1/4 are rolled flat. all i rub on is the bolt and the part of the bumper if i pull into a steep driveway. do you have a picture of where you mounted your bumper bolt & where you cut?
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 06:59 AM
  #13  
ExVtec's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,962
Likes: 0
From: WV
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (Chris.)

Yea, I'm curious on what you have to do to move that bolt.

In for pics.


Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 07:04 AM
  #14  
B serious's Avatar
Cool Cool Island Breezes. BOY-EE
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 9
From: TRILLINOIS....WAY downtown, jerky.
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (ExVtec)

yeah I did a DIY a while ago. https://honda-tech.com/zero...age=2

Look on the 2nd page. There are some pics. It's very short and self explanatory. Look for yourself and you'll see it's SOOOOO obvious.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 08:41 AM
  #15  
Import_Fan's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (B serious)

Only bitches run less than 90 degrees of negative camber!
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #16  
alexisthemovie's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 2
From: la crescenta, ca
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (Import_Fan)

-3.5 rear... which is nothing compared to people like IIGQ4U running -5. I cleared 9.5 +35 in back when I test fitted some other RG1's. My 1/4 was shaved and then pulled.

Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 07:24 AM
  #17  
ExVtec's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,962
Likes: 0
From: WV
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (B serious)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B serious &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah I did a DIY a while ago. https://honda-tech.com/zero...age=2

Look on the 2nd page. There are some pics. It's very short and self explanatory. Look for yourself and you'll see it's SOOOOO obvious.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Gotcha thx. I think that is what mine is rubbing on too.

Only on bumps/etc though. I'll get some camber and go from there.

Sidenote: How do you know how much to run f/r?

Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 08:28 AM
  #18  
B serious's Avatar
Cool Cool Island Breezes. BOY-EE
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 9
From: TRILLINOIS....WAY downtown, jerky.
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (ExVtec)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ExVtec &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Sidenote: How do you know how much to run f/r?

</TD></TR></TABLE>

Depends on what you want to do. I just test out which angles work the best for me at track events.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 08:58 AM
  #19  
ExVtec's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,962
Likes: 0
From: WV
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (B serious)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B serious &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Depends on what you want to do. I just test out which angles work the best for me at track events. </TD></TR></TABLE>

So basically you are saying take it to an alignment shop, get aligned.

Track day.

Take it to an alignment shop, get aligned.

Track day

Take it to an alignment shop, get aligned.

That would take forever to find the right combo.

This car is mainly street driven, with some spirited back roads.

Like to try out an auto-x, do drag and perhaps even a road course this coming year.

Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 09:31 AM
  #20  
alexisthemovie's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 2
From: la crescenta, ca
Default

it's recommended that you keep a -1 degree camber stagger between front and rear.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 04:36 PM
  #21  
B serious's Avatar
Cool Cool Island Breezes. BOY-EE
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 9
From: TRILLINOIS....WAY downtown, jerky.
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (ExVtec)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ExVtec &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

So basically you are saying take it to an alignment shop, get aligned.

Track day.

Take it to an alignment shop, get aligned.

Track day

Take it to an alignment shop, get aligned.

That would take forever to find the right combo.

This car is mainly street driven, with some spirited back roads.

Like to try out an auto-x, do drag and perhaps even a road course this coming year.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

Well you kind of make an educated guess as to what angles will work. From my experience, I tried a setting that was close. Then I went back to the track with a setting that I thought would be better. It's probably as good as it's going to get. The setup that I'm running currently has made me very happy and after experience from past setups, I don't think there's too much room for improvement in alignment angles with my mods and driving style.

I've had 4 different setups. Stock being one of them. This is over 11 or so track days. Since mine sees an average of 1 track day every 1k miles, trying new setups really isn't a big issue.

It depends on a lot of other things. I play around with toe angles as well.

It depends on wheel and tire sizes, spring rates, etc. etc. etc. It depends on about 1 billion things. Driving style being a big factor.

Go to the track with the car stock or as is. Then come back and post up what kind of behavior the car was exhibiting.

Example: It's over steering. One solution may be to add a little toe in the rear.

Camber is fairly easy. Go to the track with the car as is and drive it as hard as you can. Then look at the edges of your tires. If you're using the whole tire without rolling it over onto the sidewall, your camber angle is probably good. If you've got a part of the tire that isn't scuffed out or looks like it really hasn't been touching the road, you've got too much camber or you're not driving it fast enough.

You do have to go back to an alignment shop to change things, however. Every angle will change when one angle changes. Get a lifetime alignment. Get to know your alignment guy. Talk him through the alignment, tell him what angles you want, and make sure he does everything right. Obviously knowing what angles you want takes some understanding of how suspension dynamics work.

I'm not saying I'm an expert by any means. Not even close. I just know a good setup when I drive one, that's all.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2008 | 06:29 AM
  #22  
ExVtec's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,962
Likes: 0
From: WV
Default Re: -2.5 to -3.5 rear camber (B serious)

Thanks.


Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Touge Monsta
Acura Integra
25
Aug 1, 2008 05:02 PM
jaydm ferio
Suspension & Brakes
3
Oct 12, 2006 06:28 PM
drumminforev
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
33
Apr 7, 2006 02:02 PM
Dooley
Suspension & Brakes
3
Oct 7, 2005 08:28 PM
Racerage1
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
3
Jun 14, 2003 11:33 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:10 AM.