Story:
I bought a set for a Del Sol (LS Swap), but when we got the linkage it was the integra linkage. We had to pick up the linkage from a friends house and luckily we brought the Integra linkage with us to tell the difference. So I personally went back to the shop to pick up the correct linkages, but I'm not sure what I got.

Does anyone have pictures of the rod and extension? I specifically need to see the connecting ends.

Is there suppose to be a counter wieght on the end of the rod?
The rod I got does not have a counter wieght like the illustration below.

Here is an illustration, but I think Honda uses the same image for all the Del Sol linkages.


I've looked everywhere on google, yahoo and HT, but no luck. Thanks for the help.


Modified by monsterb18b at 7:30 PM 8/4/2008


Modified by monsterb18b at 7:32 PM 8/4/2008

 

the connecting end are the same on the b series what you wana see are the bend in the linkage

 

Thanks. Do you have any pictures? I will try to post some of the ones I have.

 

Google is your friend

 

Here are pictures of the linkages I got.

Can anyone tell the difference?




Modified by monsterb18b at 10:56 PM 8/4/2008

 

They definitely don't look like the same bends.

 

the linkage lowest in the picture is from an LS and the top one well I'm trying to ask for opinions.

 

Del Sol B-series linkage is shorter than all the other '92-up B linkages. Notice in your pic, the linkage assembly above is shorter than the LS linkage below it.

/my .02

 

the linkage should have the same bends as a single cam del sol linkage. however... it should be a few inch's longer. this is a hard shift linkage to get.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mcvtec &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Del Sol B-series linkage is shorter than all the other '92-up B linkages. Notice in your pic, the linkage assembly above is shorter than the LS linkage below it.

/my .02</TD></TR></TABLE>

Thanks.

Yes we tried to use the LS linkage but it was to long. I think the linkage set on top is the correct extension bar, but what about that shift rod, does it belong with that extension?

 

bump..

 

im not sure if they are/are not the correct linkage but why dont you put it on and find out. dry fit it at least without actually bolting it up to test distance and clearance.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by davefromPA &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">im not sure if they are/are not the correct linkage but why dont you put it on and find out. dry fit it at least without actually bolting it up to test distance and clearance.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Sounds like a plan.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by monsterb18b &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Thanks.

Yes we tried to use the LS linkage but it was to long. I think the linkage set on top is the correct extension bar, but what about that shift rod, does it belong with that extension?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Looks right to me but...

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by davefromPA &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">im not sure if they are/are not the correct linkage but why dont you put it on and find out. dry fit it at least without actually bolting it up to test distance and clearance.</TD></TR></TABLE>

This is what I would do too.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by monsterb18b &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Sounds like a plan.</TD></TR></TABLE>