ideal size of intake tubing n/a vs f/i

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #1  
rorik's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
From: bumfuck egypt, SD, US
Default ideal size of intake tubing n/a vs f/i

I'm just about to build an intake for my car and then I thought that the ideal intakes are probably different from n/a to boosted, and since I will be adding boost in the near future.. I did a little reading, and found that the average tubing size for an aftermarket intake is approx 3". Also found that shorter tubing=more upper rpm ve, larger diameter same thing. No surprise there, directly analogous to a ported speaker box.
However, the connections to precision's 750 front mount are 2.75", so should I just build my intake 3" and then when I add the turbosystem, neck it down to 2.75" near the intercooler, or build a new intake, 2.75 tapering up to 3" to the last radius before the TB? The whole thing wouldn't even be an issue, it would all be 2.75, if I had an oem TB, but I have a 68mm unit. (3" connection.)
What outperforms what as far as this goes?
Anyone played around with different tubing diameters to the TB?
And while I'm on the subject, wtf is with hard intercooler piping on the evo making like 5-7whp more than the oem rubber ****? I assume it is a result of a dimensional difference?
Just curious, always trying to gain more knowledge..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
denso
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
1
May 8, 2009 08:40 AM
boomersz
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
May 17, 2007 09:29 AM
the.hamburglar
Forced Induction
2
Oct 26, 2006 12:24 PM
Propulsion
Tech / Misc
4
Aug 8, 2004 11:15 PM
T_Rex
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
12
May 7, 2003 08:42 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:57 AM.