built gsr v built b20vtec
Ok been doing alot of searching and thinking .
what would make the most power on a built motor both with stock size bores
built as in
skunk2 valve train
pistons & rods
p&p head
skunk2 intake with port mached t body
what would make the most power on a built motor both with stock size bores
built as in
skunk2 valve train
pistons & rods
p&p head
skunk2 intake with port mached t body
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by pleej »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Ok been doing alot of searching and thinking</TD></TR></TABLE>
Search and think some more, B20's bore owns B18.
Search and think some more, B20's bore owns B18.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b16a4 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">same bore.
84mm?
the b20 has a larger stroke due to the crankshaft.
b20vtec ftmfw!</TD></TR></TABLE>
wow
84mm?
the b20 has a larger stroke due to the crankshaft.
b20vtec ftmfw!</TD></TR></TABLE>
wow
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b16a4 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">same bore.</TD></TR></TABLE>
No.
GSR=81mm bore.
B20=84mm bore.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b16a4 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the b20 has a larger stroke due to the crankshaft.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Correct there. The GSR has an 87.2mm crank, the B20 has an 89mm crank
No.
GSR=81mm bore.
B20=84mm bore.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b16a4 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the b20 has a larger stroke due to the crankshaft.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Correct there. The GSR has an 87.2mm crank, the B20 has an 89mm crank
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b19coupe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Correct there. The GSR has an 87.2mm crank, the B20 has an 89mm crank
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Damn. And here I was thinking it had more stroke due to the camshafts.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Damn. And here I was thinking it had more stroke due to the camshafts.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nick M »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">4) E-Racing/Bench Racing/Guess my 1/4 or HP
There is no place for it here, it is not productive, frequently leads to arguments, and is generally pointless. Go find a dyno or a drag strip.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Lock otw...
There is no place for it here, it is not productive, frequently leads to arguments, and is generally pointless. Go find a dyno or a drag strip.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Lock otw...
rod length will not give you more torque, nor will it give you more hp.
except maybe a high rpm application. even then, rod ratio only means better efficiency way up high in the rpm range, which in turn CAN lead to more power. but going by what you are saying, the rod length itself does not make more power
except maybe a high rpm application. even then, rod ratio only means better efficiency way up high in the rpm range, which in turn CAN lead to more power. but going by what you are saying, the rod length itself does not make more power
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AllMoToRB18c
For Sale
60
Jun 24, 2007 06:53 PM
lunaticracer21
Acura Integra
9
Feb 25, 2005 06:27 PM





