Need suggestions on how to pick up some whp gains
Engine:
B20/vtec
B16 second gen head ported and polished.
skunk 2 high comp valaves.
skunk 2 stage 2 cam shafts.
blox intake manfold.
stock throttle body. (58mm)
skunk 2 pro cam gears.
vibrant 4-2-1 header.
2.5half inch manrail exhaust with vibrant muffler. no cat. no res.
wisco 11.8comp pistons.
eagle h beam rods.

Current power 215whp, 165 torque.
Just looking for suggestions, maybe change up the header or whatever.
Modified by plzbeleiveit at 7:25 PM 5/25/2008
B20/vtec
B16 second gen head ported and polished.
skunk 2 high comp valaves.
skunk 2 stage 2 cam shafts.
blox intake manfold.
stock throttle body. (58mm)
skunk 2 pro cam gears.
vibrant 4-2-1 header.
2.5half inch manrail exhaust with vibrant muffler. no cat. no res.
wisco 11.8comp pistons.
eagle h beam rods.

Current power 215whp, 165 torque.
Just looking for suggestions, maybe change up the header or whatever.
Modified by plzbeleiveit at 7:25 PM 5/25/2008
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Combustion Contraption »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Whats the reasoning behind the second tensioner?</TD></TR></TABLE>
There is Quite a lot of play on that side of the timing belt. You can see it more while the engine is running and you put it under load. It actually flaps around quite a bit.
Vibrant makes a very nice second tension to take some slack out of the tbelt on that side.
Obviously people are fine without it , but I like the peace of mind
There is Quite a lot of play on that side of the timing belt. You can see it more while the engine is running and you put it under load. It actually flaps around quite a bit.
Vibrant makes a very nice second tension to take some slack out of the tbelt on that side.
Obviously people are fine without it , but I like the peace of mind
It was a rhetorical question 
I was hoping someone would chime in with some hard evidence. Since the ignition is run off the intake cam gear, a belt that is more stable SHOULD improve high RPM timing accuracy. Was hoping for a back-to-back dyno.

I was hoping someone would chime in with some hard evidence. Since the ignition is run off the intake cam gear, a belt that is more stable SHOULD improve high RPM timing accuracy. Was hoping for a back-to-back dyno.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Combustion Contraption »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It was a rhetorical question 
I was hoping someone would chime in with some hard evidence. Since the ignition is run off the intake cam gear, a belt that is more stable SHOULD improve high RPM timing accuracy. Was hoping for a back-to-back dyno.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Jerk . . .

I was hoping someone would chime in with some hard evidence. Since the ignition is run off the intake cam gear, a belt that is more stable SHOULD improve high RPM timing accuracy. Was hoping for a back-to-back dyno.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Jerk . . .
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2fastGSR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Jerk . . .
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Jerk . . .
</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Combustion Contraption »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I could probably do a dyno test with it on and off next month if you'd like sir
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I could probably do a dyno test with it on and off next month if you'd like sir
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2fastGSR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I could probably do a dyno test with it on and off next month if you'd like sir</TD></TR></TABLE>
Imagine that. Real tech.
I could probably do a dyno test with it on and off next month if you'd like sir</TD></TR></TABLE>
Imagine that. Real tech.
you're power #'s seem to change depending on what forum you're posting on.
I thought you already made 224whp?
I'd get a better header to go with your 2.5 inch "manrail" exhaust (lol....sorry i had to).
I thought you already had a larger throttle body? The one you were selling on TCC/TI/JDMR? A larger t/b could help with the top end power and maybe add a few peak whp (if thats what you're after).
I thought you already made 224whp?
I'd get a better header to go with your 2.5 inch "manrail" exhaust (lol....sorry i had to).
I thought you already had a larger throttle body? The one you were selling on TCC/TI/JDMR? A larger t/b could help with the top end power and maybe add a few peak whp (if thats what you're after).
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by plzbeleiveit »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">mississauga engines</TD></TR></TABLE>
i hope ur saying ur prayers and eating ur vitamins, cuz those guys machining process' and assembly is very poor
Modified by Rollo Lawson at 12:08 PM 5/27/2008
i hope ur saying ur prayers and eating ur vitamins, cuz those guys machining process' and assembly is very poor
Modified by Rollo Lawson at 12:08 PM 5/27/2008
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DTA-Zombie »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">aside from that I'd be looking at the internals again, different tuner or tuning program - </TD></TR></TABLE>
I was gunna suggest this as well.
I was gunna suggest this as well.
was making 224whp but for some no appearent reason i lost whp, i think it might have somthing to do the the gearing in the transmission 4th seemed long.
Update: put a 70mm throttle body made 231whp.
still same 4-2-1 vibrant header.
Update: put a 70mm throttle body made 231whp.
still same 4-2-1 vibrant header.



