My B20VTEC dyno w/ Skunk2 PRO2 cams
THE SETUP:
Block:
B20B block (stock sleeves 84mm)
RS Machines "JDM ITR" Pistons (84mm)
Eagle Specialties Products Forged H-Beam rods
PR4/89mm Crankshaft
ACL bearings
P8R Honda Headgasket
Endyn Oil Plumbing kit (sandwich plate w/STEEL adapter)
Golden Eagle dowel pins
P72 headbolts
ITR oil pump
PCT crank pulley
Royal Purple Synthetic 5w30 oil
Filtech/Honda oil filter
custom breather box setup (OEM Honda nipples off the back of the block)
baffled PR4 oil pan
Head:
P72 head
stock portwork + cleanup
Skunk2 PRO2+ Camshafts
Skunk2 PRO Valvesprings
Skunk2 Ti retainers
Skunk2 Cam gears (I+3 E+2)
ITR Intake valves
ITR Lost Motion Assemblies
Engine misc:
AEBS intake manifold portmatched by PBTuning
PBTuning 70mm Throttle Body
P73 throttle cable and bracket
Fuel:
B16A2 billet fuel rail
390cc injectors
OEM Honda resistor box
Walbro 255lph High Pressure intank fuel pump (re-wired DSM style)
Exhaust:
Big Tube Tri-Y header ("Hytech")
Omni-Power 2.5" Test Pipe
Apex-i World Sport 2 exhaust
Ignition:
all OEM Honda parts
NGK BPR7ES V-Power plugs
Transmission:
JDM S80/ITR 4.4FD transmission
OEM Honda LSD
Engine Management/Electronics:
USDM P61 ECU
CROME PRO
PLX M-300 wideband
Moates Ostrich
Moates Burn1

219.31whp 147.62ft tq
only put a couple miles on this, plus all of our street tuning. but i would have to say that I LOVE THIS MOTOR.
just has amazing torque. lots of 'passing power' in 5th, just lay into it and your movin quick. or maybe i have just been driving B16's and single cams too long lol
for those that have tuned similar setups with Skunk2 Pro2 cams, you have the same tq curve? kinda odd that i made more torque on low cam than high cam, and that shitty dip in the VTEC crossover area. oh yeah and VTEC wanted to be at 6400rpms i believe.
Modified by EFsSuck at 8:25 PM 5/15/2008
Block:
B20B block (stock sleeves 84mm)
RS Machines "JDM ITR" Pistons (84mm)
Eagle Specialties Products Forged H-Beam rods
PR4/89mm Crankshaft
ACL bearings
P8R Honda Headgasket
Endyn Oil Plumbing kit (sandwich plate w/STEEL adapter)
Golden Eagle dowel pins
P72 headbolts
ITR oil pump
PCT crank pulley
Royal Purple Synthetic 5w30 oil
Filtech/Honda oil filter
custom breather box setup (OEM Honda nipples off the back of the block)
baffled PR4 oil pan
Head:
P72 head
stock portwork + cleanup
Skunk2 PRO2+ Camshafts
Skunk2 PRO Valvesprings
Skunk2 Ti retainers
Skunk2 Cam gears (I+3 E+2)
ITR Intake valves
ITR Lost Motion Assemblies
Engine misc:
AEBS intake manifold portmatched by PBTuning
PBTuning 70mm Throttle Body
P73 throttle cable and bracket
Fuel:
B16A2 billet fuel rail
390cc injectors
OEM Honda resistor box
Walbro 255lph High Pressure intank fuel pump (re-wired DSM style)
Exhaust:
Big Tube Tri-Y header ("Hytech")
Omni-Power 2.5" Test Pipe
Apex-i World Sport 2 exhaust
Ignition:
all OEM Honda parts
NGK BPR7ES V-Power plugs
Transmission:
JDM S80/ITR 4.4FD transmission
OEM Honda LSD
Engine Management/Electronics:
USDM P61 ECU
CROME PRO
PLX M-300 wideband
Moates Ostrich
Moates Burn1

219.31whp 147.62ft tq
only put a couple miles on this, plus all of our street tuning. but i would have to say that I LOVE THIS MOTOR.
just has amazing torque. lots of 'passing power' in 5th, just lay into it and your movin quick. or maybe i have just been driving B16's and single cams too long lolfor those that have tuned similar setups with Skunk2 Pro2 cams, you have the same tq curve? kinda odd that i made more torque on low cam than high cam, and that shitty dip in the VTEC crossover area. oh yeah and VTEC wanted to be at 6400rpms i believe.
Modified by EFsSuck at 8:25 PM 5/15/2008
I just looked at the graph and could tell what header he was using. That pairing always sucks between 6 and 7. I don't understand why everyone uses those headers. Oh well decent numbers tho, should be higher with pro 2's. Needs more compression to wake the cams up. Thats what graphs on 2L's look like at 11.5:1 with Pro 2's not degreed in. If the vtec wanted to be at 6,400 that is a dead give away that it needs more compression.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BearsEK-KMSU »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> f the vtec wanted to be at 6,400 that is a dead give away that it needs more compression.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Higher compression doesn't buy much on a stock head.
This is basically a stock head with a over-sized header and cams not degreed in. I think if he degreed the cams in a went with a sms/dtr header that would eliminated the dip and yield more power and torque.
Higher compression doesn't buy much on a stock head.
This is basically a stock head with a over-sized header and cams not degreed in. I think if he degreed the cams in a went with a sms/dtr header that would eliminated the dip and yield more power and torque.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1 2 NV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i made peak torque at 7700 or so on my pro 2s. were they degreed?</TD></TR></TABLE>
not really sure what degree them in is. read about it, didnt seem to make 100% since to me. we dialed in the cam gears, wouldnt that do the same thing'ish?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BearsEK-KMSU »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I just looked at the graph and could tell what header he was using. That pairing always sucks between 6 and 7. I don't understand why everyone uses those headers. Oh well decent numbers tho, should be higher with pro 2's. Needs more compression to wake the cams up. Thats what graphs on 2L's look like at 11.5:1 with Pro 2's not degreed in. If the vtec wanted to be at 6,400 that is a dead give away that it needs more compression.</TD></TR></TABLE>
beautiful, the kind of response i was looking for. well not entirely, but helpful forsure! but i expect to find some things that will need improving over time.
not really sure what degree them in is. read about it, didnt seem to make 100% since to me. we dialed in the cam gears, wouldnt that do the same thing'ish?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BearsEK-KMSU »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I just looked at the graph and could tell what header he was using. That pairing always sucks between 6 and 7. I don't understand why everyone uses those headers. Oh well decent numbers tho, should be higher with pro 2's. Needs more compression to wake the cams up. Thats what graphs on 2L's look like at 11.5:1 with Pro 2's not degreed in. If the vtec wanted to be at 6,400 that is a dead give away that it needs more compression.</TD></TR></TABLE>
beautiful, the kind of response i was looking for. well not entirely, but helpful forsure! but i expect to find some things that will need improving over time.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1 2 NV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">anyone see anything wrong with the cam gear settings? i sure do. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Wow, I think he had better read those instructions again.
Man, it's a good thing he has room with those pistons.
Wow, I think he had better read those instructions again.
Man, it's a good thing he has room with those pistons.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1 2 NV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">anyone see anything wrong with the cam gear settings? i sure do. </TD></TR></TABLE>
He is probably .015 from disaster. If not less.
He is probably .015 from disaster. If not less.
im not too worried about the P2V issues its the V2V issues.
what have you seen with pro 2s steve? i couldnt get jack out of them until i seperated them 4 degrees. the pro 3s took 5 before i was in a comfort zone.
what have you seen with pro 2s steve? i couldnt get jack out of them until i seperated them 4 degrees. the pro 3s took 5 before i was in a comfort zone.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Combustion Contraption »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">He is probably .015 from disaster. If not less.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Some of us like to live on the edge.
Some of us like to live on the edge.
Try lowering VTEC to around 5000
Advance the exhaust cam another 3 degrees
You should be able to reach MBT without knock on the high cam. Somewhere between 34-42deg BTDC.
Having peak torque on the low cam is not right.
Advance the exhaust cam another 3 degrees
You should be able to reach MBT without knock on the high cam. Somewhere between 34-42deg BTDC.
Having peak torque on the low cam is not right.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1 2 NV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">im not too worried about the P2V issues its the V2V issues.
what have you seen with pro 2s steve? i couldnt get jack out of them until i seperated them 4 degrees. the pro 3s took 5 before i was in a comfort zone.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I have seen 2 deg's seperation net .030 clearance with 'special vj' but on something I dont know whats been done to the seats, I wouldnt go closer than 4. 3 if I woke up on the right side of the bed.
what have you seen with pro 2s steve? i couldnt get jack out of them until i seperated them 4 degrees. the pro 3s took 5 before i was in a comfort zone.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I have seen 2 deg's seperation net .030 clearance with 'special vj' but on something I dont know whats been done to the seats, I wouldnt go closer than 4. 3 if I woke up on the right side of the bed.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b19coupe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Some of us like to live on the edge.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Some of you are engine building machines! If you bend valves, its only a week downtime for some guys.
Some of us like to live on the edge.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Some of you are engine building machines! If you bend valves, its only a week downtime for some guys.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EFsSuck »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so, those are those cam settings bad? im fairly new to this level of tuning of NA cars.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Basically, as you move the gears further away from each other, the amount of space in between your valves @ overlap (when they are both open, I and E) increases. Conversely, the closer they are numerically on the gears, the less amount of space you have in between them. Different people use different numbers as the "bare minimum" , but with only 1 cam gear deg of seperation between the cams on those particular camshafts, you are probably asking for disaster. I think I will do a vid on the next v2v check I do so people understand just how close we are talking here.
Plus you would all get to see how studly I am.
Basically, as you move the gears further away from each other, the amount of space in between your valves @ overlap (when they are both open, I and E) increases. Conversely, the closer they are numerically on the gears, the less amount of space you have in between them. Different people use different numbers as the "bare minimum" , but with only 1 cam gear deg of seperation between the cams on those particular camshafts, you are probably asking for disaster. I think I will do a vid on the next v2v check I do so people understand just how close we are talking here.
Plus you would all get to see how studly I am.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by soulpwr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You did a valve job when you put those valves in right?</TD></TR></TABLE>
valves where just lapped.
valves where just lapped.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Combustion Contraption »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think I will do a vid on the next v2v check I do so people understand just how close we are talking here.
Plus you would all get to see how studly I am.</TD></TR></TABLE>
do not want video. i dont think i can handle how studly steve is.
marshall, what the heck is intec up to? you guys have been quiet for being starting the drag season.
Plus you would all get to see how studly I am.</TD></TR></TABLE>
do not want video. i dont think i can handle how studly steve is.
marshall, what the heck is intec up to? you guys have been quiet for being starting the drag season.
so, you think i should crank the intake back to 2* then?
when we were tuning it he said the motor didnt like the overlap on one of the cam settings. think thats when we ended up with those numbers.
when we were tuning it he said the motor didnt like the overlap on one of the cam settings. think thats when we ended up with those numbers.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EFsSuck »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
valves where just lapped.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Type R valves are oversized. Start there
valves where just lapped.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Type R valves are oversized. Start there
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Combustion Contraption »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I think I will do a vid on the next v2v check I do so people understand just how close we are talking here.
Plus you would all get to see how studly I am.</TD></TR></TABLE>
The video eagerly anticipated, your studlyness not so much, lol.
I think I will do a vid on the next v2v check I do so people understand just how close we are talking here.
Plus you would all get to see how studly I am.</TD></TR></TABLE>
The video eagerly anticipated, your studlyness not so much, lol.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1 2 NV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">marshall, what the heck is intec up to? you guys have been quiet for being starting the drag season.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Not sure. I havn't been involved there for over a year now. Finishing school and doing Formula-SAE stuff.
Still building motors though
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EFsSuck »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so, you think i should crank the intake back to 2* then?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Your intake looks fine. Exhaust should be advanced first. Try 5, go further if it makes more power.
Not sure. I havn't been involved there for over a year now. Finishing school and doing Formula-SAE stuff.
Still building motors though
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EFsSuck »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so, you think i should crank the intake back to 2* then?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Your intake looks fine. Exhaust should be advanced first. Try 5, go further if it makes more power.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mar778c »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The video eagerly anticipated, your studlyness not so much, lol.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Hater
Hater
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 92TypeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Your intake looks fine. Exhaust should be advanced first. Try 5, go further if it makes more power.</TD></TR></TABLE>
pretty sure it idled like complete **** when we advanced the exhaust more than what its at. i will call my tuner and double check.
Your intake looks fine. Exhaust should be advanced first. Try 5, go further if it makes more power.</TD></TR></TABLE>
pretty sure it idled like complete **** when we advanced the exhaust more than what its at. i will call my tuner and double check.





