2010 Camaro spotted lapping on the nurburgring!
spotted this at camaro5
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/...=3616
Looks downright mean on that 3/4 frontal shot. This has to be some high performance version with those Brembos.
I hated the previous gen Camaro but this looks much much better with those small overhangs.
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/...=3616
Looks downright mean on that 3/4 frontal shot. This has to be some high performance version with those Brembos.
I hated the previous gen Camaro but this looks much much better with those small overhangs.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xtrac1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Looks good. Anyone know if its coming with IRS or live rear axle?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Good Question. I'm glad those are not the production headlights.
Good Question. I'm glad those are not the production headlights.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xtrac1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Ok, cause I was gonna say, why are they at the 'Ring then. On the flip side, it'll probably upset the 1/4 mile crowd. </TD></TR></TABLE>
The die-hard drag guys want the live axel; but the IRS is clearly superior for everything else.
Anything but a 10-bolt is a step in the right direction lol.
The die-hard drag guys want the live axel; but the IRS is clearly superior for everything else.
Anything but a 10-bolt is a step in the right direction lol.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RynoDyno312 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The die-hard drag guys want the live axel; but the IRS is clearly superior for everything else.
Anything but a 10-bolt is a step in the right direction lol.</TD></TR></TABLE>
yea, 3rd and 4th gens had a POS rear end.
and Ford really needs to step up their game, this Camaro seems to be superior in every way.
The die-hard drag guys want the live axel; but the IRS is clearly superior for everything else.
Anything but a 10-bolt is a step in the right direction lol.</TD></TR></TABLE>
yea, 3rd and 4th gens had a POS rear end.
and Ford really needs to step up their game, this Camaro seems to be superior in every way.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by E-Rok »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
yea, 3rd and 4th gens had a POS rear end.
and Ford really needs to step up their game, this Camaro seems to be superior in every way.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well see how well it sells.
Gm wanted to kill the camaro in 93. they will kill it again.
yea, 3rd and 4th gens had a POS rear end.
and Ford really needs to step up their game, this Camaro seems to be superior in every way.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well see how well it sells.
Gm wanted to kill the camaro in 93. they will kill it again.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ScareyH22A »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">2" tow hitch ftw! Where u at Rustang!?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Still outselling the camaro since '67
Still outselling the camaro since '67
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rico91stang »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Still outselling the camaro since '67</TD></TR></TABLE>
Last I checked, Civics outsold both. So wat?
Still outselling the camaro since '67</TD></TR></TABLE>
Last I checked, Civics outsold both. So wat?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rico91stang »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Still outselling the camaro since '67</TD></TR></TABLE>
The Mustang has always sold better (save for one or two years); the f-body has always performed better (save one or two years).
Still outselling the camaro since '67</TD></TR></TABLE>
The Mustang has always sold better (save for one or two years); the f-body has always performed better (save one or two years).
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RynoDyno312 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The Mustang has always sold better (save for one or two years); the f-body has always performed better (save one or two years).</TD></TR></TABLE>
I bet the Focus outsold the Camaro too. In your effing face GM!
The Mustang has always sold better (save for one or two years); the f-body has always performed better (save one or two years).</TD></TR></TABLE>
I bet the Focus outsold the Camaro too. In your effing face GM!
Smells like Tuna

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,813
Likes: 0
From: Illinois where the S is silent stupid.
from that one commercial
snotty german - WHAT YOU COULDN'T FIND ANY NICE CARS HERE IN GERMANY ?
american badass - no i couldn't find any nice roads in america.
snotty german - WHAT YOU COULDN'T FIND ANY NICE CARS HERE IN GERMANY ?
american badass - no i couldn't find any nice roads in america.
i gues im the only person on here who is dissapointed with GM with this fugly camaro.
ghey retro style.
gm is running out of ideas and had to copy ford with the retro style. blah.
ghey retro style.
gm is running out of ideas and had to copy ford with the retro style. blah.
Retro is not a bad thing when it looks this good.
Other manufacturers also have already done this.
Ford GT (nearly exact copy of the GT40)
Dodge Challenger Nearly the same body lines as the car had almost 40 years ago.
GM and I hope it actually lives up to the hype. The mustang still looks bland compaired to the two cars said above.
Other manufacturers also have already done this.
Ford GT (nearly exact copy of the GT40)
Dodge Challenger Nearly the same body lines as the car had almost 40 years ago.
GM and I hope it actually lives up to the hype. The mustang still looks bland compaired to the two cars said above.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by graveltravel2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i gues im the only person on here who is dissapointed with GM with this fugly camaro.
ghey retro style.
gm is running out of ideas and had to copy ford with the retro style. blah.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I see where you are comming from, but I do think they went a bit over the top with the edgyness of the of the body.
ghey retro style.
gm is running out of ideas and had to copy ford with the retro style. blah.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I see where you are comming from, but I do think they went a bit over the top with the edgyness of the of the body.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ScareyH22A »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Last I checked, Civics outsold both. So wat?</TD></TR></TABLE>
EXACTLY!!!
That is what it comes down to. Sales and profit. Ford wants a civic and a camry. They have been trying for years. You actually think they care about performance? You think Ford COULDN'T put an irs and a high winding v8 in a mustang? Please. Would it sell is the question? Then will it make us money.
Last I checked, Civics outsold both. So wat?</TD></TR></TABLE>
EXACTLY!!!
That is what it comes down to. Sales and profit. Ford wants a civic and a camry. They have been trying for years. You actually think they care about performance? You think Ford COULDN'T put an irs and a high winding v8 in a mustang? Please. Would it sell is the question? Then will it make us money.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by .Sarge. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Retro is not a bad thing when it looks this good.
Other manufacturers also have already done this.
Ford GT (nearly exact copy of the GT40)
Dodge Challenger Nearly the same body lines as the car had almost 40 years ago.
GM and I hope it actually lives up to the hype. The mustang still looks bland compaired to the two cars said above.</TD></TR></TABLE>
most likely it wont "live up to the hype", due to its $35k+ price tag.
Other manufacturers also have already done this.
Ford GT (nearly exact copy of the GT40)
Dodge Challenger Nearly the same body lines as the car had almost 40 years ago.
GM and I hope it actually lives up to the hype. The mustang still looks bland compaired to the two cars said above.</TD></TR></TABLE>most likely it wont "live up to the hype", due to its $35k+ price tag.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by graveltravel2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
most likely it wont "live up to the hype", due to its $35k+ price tag.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Exactly. Gm is going to price it out of the reach of the average american. Like it always does.
most likely it wont "live up to the hype", due to its $35k+ price tag.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Exactly. Gm is going to price it out of the reach of the average american. Like it always does.
Oh yeah I forgot I can edit my own title! Yay!
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 13,658
Likes: 1
From: 626, So Cal
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rico91stang »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Exactly. Gm is going to price it out of the reach of the average american. Like it always does. </TD></TR></TABLE>
It better not.
Exactly. Gm is going to price it out of the reach of the average american. Like it always does. </TD></TR></TABLE>
It better not.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by graveltravel2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
most likely it wont "live up to the hype", due to its $35k+ price tag.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
exactly. they concept the car, everyone thought it was badass, the they wait years before releasing when they hype is over
most likely it wont "live up to the hype", due to its $35k+ price tag.
</TD></TR></TABLE>exactly. they concept the car, everyone thought it was badass, the they wait years before releasing when they hype is over






