Edelbrock #4760 Manifold vs Skunk 2 Manifold

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 13, 2008 | 05:42 PM

gs1gsr

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 240

Likes: 0

From: bakersfield, ca, united states

Edelbrock #4760 Manifold vs Skunk 2 Manifold

Ok so I’m wanting every ones thought on this. I have used the Edelbrock Manifold and liked it. All my friends say they like the Skunk 2 manifold. What is the power difference between the two and the difference between short and long runners?The motor build that these manifolds will be on is a Fully built LSV with gsr crank and rod, 12-1 Cp Pistons and gsr head with ctr cam shafts and flat valves.

Mar 12, 2008 | 04:54 PM

allmotor65stang

Junior Member

Joined: Nov 2007

Posts: 96

Likes: 0

From: oakley ca,

i wanna know to

Mar 12, 2008 | 04:59 PM

I makes it RAIN

Junior Member

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 312

Likes: 0

From: Peniscola, FL, United States

Re: Edelbrock #4760 Manifold vs Skunk 2 Manifold (gs1gsr)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gs1gsr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">12-1 Cp Pistons and gsr head with ctr cam shafts and flat valves.</TD></TR></TABLE> I think you need better cams first...

Mar 12, 2008 | 05:00 PM

JCushing

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 3,138

Likes: 0

From: Suck it Trebek

Re: Edelbrock #4760 Manifold vs Skunk 2 Manifold (gs1gsr)

from the edelbrocks website: "HONDA/ACURA B-SERIES MANIFOLDS Optimized for maximum power from 7,000 to 10,000 RPM"

they arent kidding when they say that, midrange (anything below 7k) really takes a dump on those manifolds.

type R "style" manifolds arent "supposed" to work that good on GSR heads cause they are designed for the port angles of a typeR. the PN of the edelbrock was for a GSR so im guessing you have one.

personally id go with a performer X instead of a victor X if this is a street motor.