Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

Camshaft dilemma

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 09:23 PM
  #1  
db1_jdm's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Henderson, Nevada, usa
Default Camshaft dilemma

Im currently in the process of reubilding my B18C head. Ive instaled supertech bronze valve guides, supertech valve giude seals. Now I plan on going with skunk 2 dual valvesprings and supertech aluminum magnesium alloy retainers and some supertech hi-comp valves along with a mugen head gasket, and a mild porting. But I still havent decided wich cams should I go with, im thinking about skunk 2 stage 1, or skunk 2 stage 2. I will be keeping my stock gsr manifold, and maybe go with a jdm itr header. I have the cash to purchase either one, but I dont know wich would be best for my setup, it is a DB1 daily driven, I would like some decent power out of it still on 91 octane. Should I go ahead and get stage 2, or is it too much cam for my setup?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 06:50 AM
  #2  
GRAF-FITI's Avatar
* B A N N E D *
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,557
Likes: 1
From: states united
Default Re: Camshaft dilemma (db1_jdm)

the skunk2 stage 2 cams would be more than adequate
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 06:54 AM
  #3  
Micha's Avatar
FAILWGN
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,295
Likes: 0
From: Who knows these days?
Default Re: Camshaft dilemma (GRAF-FITI)

Here is the most important question. What is your CR?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #4  
db1_jdm's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Henderson, Nevada, usa
Default Re: Camshaft dilemma (micha)

[QUOTE=micha]Here is the most important question. What is your CR? [/QUOTE

well the stock cr, is 10.1:1 with the mugen headgasket it raises it to 10.5:1 and the valves raise it to 0.3-0.5 to aprox CR would be about 10.8:1-11.0:1.


GRAF-ITI So do you suggest the stage 2? According to skunk 2 the stage 2 cams work best using their intake manifold, I still would like to keep my oem manifold though

Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #5  
db1_jdm's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Henderson, Nevada, usa
Default Re: Camshaft dilemma (db1_jdm)

bump
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 08:16 PM
  #6  
db1_jdm's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Henderson, Nevada, usa
Default Re: Camshaft dilemma (db1_jdm)

bump
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 08:28 PM
  #7  
SleeperGSR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 1
From: Binghamton, NY, US
Default Re: Camshaft dilemma (db1_jdm)

You could keep your manifold but like skunk 2 says they work best with theirs. From what i understand, i'm not a pro engine builder. But you'll be able to take advantage of the sk2 manifold by having a build head. Rather than just someone bolting on the manifold expecting performance gains. I can't immagine that it would be that noticable tho, you might be able to make a little more midrange by getting rid of the IAB's. Seems to make sence to me.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 08:33 PM
  #8  
db1_jdm's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Henderson, Nevada, usa
Default Re: Camshaft dilemma (SleeperGSR)

^hmmm thanks for your input ^
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #9  
db1_jdm's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Henderson, Nevada, usa
Default Re: Camshaft dilemma (db1_jdm)

cmon bitches anyone else that knows about cams
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 06:43 AM
  #10  
LSracing94's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 2
From: budd lake, nj, usa
Default Re: Camshaft dilemma (db1_jdm)

you should really upgrade the intake manifold if youre going to be doing this. skunk 2 stage 2 is more than enough cam for your setup.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
db1_jdm
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
3
Feb 12, 2008 08:22 AM
RiSiNgDc2
Acura Integra
4
Mar 9, 2006 03:53 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:18 PM.