Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack Road Racing / AUTOX, HPDE, Time Attack

15x6.5+35 w/ 225 (front); 15x7+43 w/ 205 (back), opinion?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 09:07 AM
  #1  
Nova_Dust's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Default 15x6.5+35 w/ 225 (front); 15x7+43 w/ 205 (back), opinion?

Hi all, just wish to ask a quick question about my 2008 tire/wheel setup. Purpose of this setup is for up coming road racing/lapping season.

2007 setup:

Front (16K, setting #5 on the track <5 settings&gt - 225/45/15 RA1 + 15x7 +43 wheel (TE37 for reference)
Rear (14K, setting #5 on the track <5 settings&gt - 205/50/15 RA1 + 15x7 +43 wheel

2008 setup:

Front (16K, setting #5 on the track <5 settings&gt - 225/45/15 RA1 + 15x6.5 +35 wheel (SW388 for reference)
Rear (14K, setting #5 on the track <5 settings&gt - 205/50/15 RA1 + 15x7 +43 wheel

I am also thinking using one of these Wheel Adpater Spacer

I have been looking for reviews on this type of product, didn't find any (or perhaps I didn't search hard enough).

Going from +43 to +35 is an increase of 8mm, with another 25mm, that is 33mm wider than before. Perhaps like running a +10 offset wheel. I have known people mount 225 on 6.5 inch wheel but I have never driven that setup before myself.

The reason I didn't think about using the +35 on the rear is fear of rubbing. I ran +43 on the back and with the current drop, I could almost fit a finger in there on an angle. Roll the fender is an option, I suppose.

2007 season setup was nice, I liked it. Any advise on my 2008 plan would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 09:52 AM
  #2  
nsxtasy's Avatar
H-T Order of Merit
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 23,478
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Default Re: 15x6.5+35 w/ 225 (front); 15x7+43 w/ 205 (back), opinion? (Nova_Dust)

Why would you put the wider tires on the narrower wheels?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 10:12 AM
  #3  
Stinkycheezmonky's Avatar
Suspetise...
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,287
Likes: 1
From: Burninating the peasants yo
Default Re: 15x6.5+35 w/ 225 (nsxtasy)

I don't think that'll make much of a difference in anything. If you're really set on it, just uncomplicate that whole mess and roll the fenders while running a 10mm spacer on the front. You'd also need extended studs on the front, but BFD right?

No matter what, it seems to me like a step back to use a 6.5" wide wheel in the front just to get that offset.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 10:56 AM
  #4  
mormonboy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 1
Default Re: 15x6.5+35 w/ 225 (Stinkycheezmonky)

wouldnt wider tires on a slimmer wheel create more sidewall flex?

Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 11:32 AM
  #5  
Nova_Dust's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Default

True, true and true. It does seem like a step back, I guess I didn't want to experience rear quarter contact, but won't really know for sure until I put it on.

What is BFD?

That Ebay spacer has studs on it already, would it be a simpler solution to use extended studs?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 11:43 AM
  #6  
Aquafina's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,966
Likes: 43
From: Johnson City TN
Default

Big expletiveing deal.

Would you trust ebay parts out on track?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 11:47 AM
  #7  
Nova_Dust's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Default

haha, I see.

Aside from running wider front, I was wondering if pushing the front wheels out further, either by offset of spacers, would somewhat elevate the driving pleasure, hence using the +35 on the front.

Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #8  
Stinkycheezmonky's Avatar
Suspetise...
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,287
Likes: 1
From: Burninating the peasants yo
Default Re: (Nova_Dust)

Just as reference for you, I tried throwing 10mm spacers on the front of my car just for kicks. On the street I noticed a very minor difference. On track, I didn't notice it at all, and actually couldn't distinguish between sessions whether I had them on or not.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #9  
Nova_Dust's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Default

Thanks for the suggestion.

It is just that, I only have two +35 (6.5") and two +43 (7"). If I run the +35 in the rear, would wider rear end present a problem? Perhaps problem isn't the right word, unexpected cornering situation if you will?

I do have sets of 225 and 205.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 12:23 PM
  #10  
thisisntjared's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
From: southern, nj, usa
Default Re: (Stinkycheezmonky)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Stinkycheezmonky &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Just as reference for you, I tried throwing 10mm spacers on the front of my car just for kicks. On the street I noticed a very minor difference. On track, I didn't notice it at all, and actually couldn't distinguish between sessions whether I had them on or not.</TD></TR></TABLE>thats interesting. do you think that you couldnt tell the difference on the track because the tires masked it or because the car was at the limit?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 02:29 PM
  #11  
Gunns's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Why dont you just buy two more 15x7" wheels and run 225/45/15 all the way around?

If it rubs then roll the fenders, raise the car or run more negative camber.

I like to be able to rotate the tires as tracks around the GTA seem to eat the left front tire of FWD cars.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #12  
nsxtasy's Avatar
H-T Order of Merit
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 23,478
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Default Re: (Gunns)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Gunns &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I like to be able to rotate the tires as tracks around the GTA seem to eat the left front tire of FWD cars. </TD></TR></TABLE>

That's true of tracks that are run clockwise, so they have more right turns than left turns. Most (not all, but most) of the road courses east of the Rockies are run clockwise. "Rovals" tend to run counterclockwise.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 03:03 PM
  #13  
Stinkycheezmonky's Avatar
Suspetise...
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,287
Likes: 1
From: Burninating the peasants yo
Default Re: (thisisntjared)

So you have two pairs of mismatched wheels. I'd personally just find another pair of whichever ones and use all of them. The 7" +43s are probably your better option, and you could always choose to run spacers if you wanted/it was needed.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by thisisntjared &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thats interesting. do you think that you couldnt tell the difference on the track because the tires masked it or because the car was at the limit?</TD></TR></TABLE>

I'm guessing because the car was at the limit, but I'm really not sure. I tried that with both street tires and R-comps, and noticed no difference between the two, as far as how much I noticed the spacers (crap, what a mouthful! )
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 04:08 PM
  #14  
SHG_Mike's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Default Re: (Stinkycheezmonky)

+35 with 1.5 neg camber will not rub if you roll the fenders slightly. I ran +32 with them rolls slightly and they were FINE
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #15  
Aquafina's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,966
Likes: 43
From: Johnson City TN
Default Re: (Stinkycheezmonky)

Do you think you would have noticed a difference on track if you had adjusted all your suspension settings with the spacers on? Or had you already done that?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #16  
Stinkycheezmonky's Avatar
Suspetise...
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,287
Likes: 1
From: Burninating the peasants yo
Default Re: (Aquafina)

I made no changes, but I don't even know what I would've changed. At the time, camber was unadjustable, I wouldn't bother to mess with toe for any reason. It's possible that there could've been some better adjustment, but I wouldn't know where to begin.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 05:26 PM
  #17  
Nova_Dust's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,476
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Default Re: (Gunns)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Gunns &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why dont you just buy two more 15x7" wheels and run 225/45/15 all the way around?

If it rubs then roll the fenders, raise the car or run more negative camber.

I like to be able to rotate the tires as tracks around the GTA seem to eat the left front tire of FWD cars. </TD></TR></TABLE>

I used to run white/bronze TE37. Then I decided to sell the white ones because I want to try different offset. So I bought the +35 6.5" ones.

I do have rear negative camber due to adjustable coilover, as for how much, I do not know. Perhaps +35 at the rear with 205 tires should be fine. Afterall, I am running 14K spring rate at the rear. Shouldn't bounce all that much.

It is just funny thinking +43 in the front, and +35 in the rear. Unless, I run 205 all around with +35 in the front and +43 in the rear? 205 is still reasonable for 6.5".

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mattcx
Wheel and Tire
2
Jul 14, 2009 08:35 PM
K20EF8
Wheel and Tire
2
Oct 5, 2005 06:38 AM
Nyceguy17
Suspension & Brakes
4
Jan 21, 2005 03:41 PM
lastlude2k1se
Acura Integra Type-R
2
Oct 30, 2003 11:25 PM
MoBlack
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
11
Jun 27, 2002 04:31 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:52 AM.