which tranny would be best

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 10:52 PM
  #1  
1991hb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA, USA
Default which tranny would be best

I have a d16y8 that I'm gonna put in my 1991 hatchback. What cable transmission would be best to use with it? The only one I could think of would be the 4th generation SI transmission or the transmission that came with the Y8. Let me know guys, thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 11:03 PM
  #2  
Ak_ef9's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage, AK
Default Re: which tranny would be best (1991hb)

the cable SI tranny
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 11:25 PM
  #3  
gursh d's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
From: College Park, MD
Default Re: which tranny would be best (1991hb)

it really depends on what your using the car for. If your tracking it, you would want a shorter geared transmissiom, if it's your daily, you want better gas mleage so crusing at 3500 while going 60 isn't ideal.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 12:17 AM
  #4  
StorminMatt's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,303
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA, USA
Default Re: which tranny would be best (gursh d)

Then again, it has been my experience that, when it comes to fuel economy, Honda engines don't benefit NEARLY as much as you might think from taller gearing. I tried swapping an HF transmission into my brother's 1989 DX HB wih the hopes of getting better mileage. But it seems like all this has done is turn the car into a total dog that doesn't really get noticeably better gas mileage. So I say go with the SI tranmission. Why go tall with the gearing if it is going to ruin the performance of your swap, and maybe get you 1-2MPG improvement (at best) over an SI transmission?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 11:33 AM
  #5  
1991hb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA, USA
Default

Thanks guys, I'm gonna go with the SI tranny
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #6  
ludesrv's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 3
From: Kitchener, On, Canada
Default Re: (1991hb)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1991hb &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Thanks guys, I'm gonna go with the SI tranny</TD></TR></TABLE>

If you have an HF tranny you can find, used the fifth gear from it and install in your si tranny. You get 4 gears that are exactly like an Si, but a fifth gear that will act like a DX. Both si and dx have the same fifth gear just different final drives IIRC. The hf tho is much taller of a gear.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 03:05 PM
  #7  
CRX Toad's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,638
Likes: 1
From: Near Charlotte
Default Re: which tranny would be best (1991hb)

what do you want to do with the car lets figure that out first.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 03:11 PM
  #8  
boosted dohc zc's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: battleground, WA, USA
Default Re: which tranny would be best (CRX Toad)

i personally like the short geared zc tranny
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #9  
george34's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 1
From: Wapakoneta, OH, U.S
Default Re: which tranny would be best (StorminMatt)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by StorminMatt &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Then again, it has been my experience that, when it comes to fuel economy, Honda engines don't benefit NEARLY as much as you might think from taller gearing. I tried swapping an HF transmission into my brother's 1989 DX HB wih the hopes of getting better mileage. But it seems like all this has done is turn the car into a total dog that doesn't really get noticeably better gas mileage. So I say go with the SI tranmission. Why go tall with the gearing if it is going to ruin the performance of your swap, and maybe get you 1-2MPG improvement (at best) over an SI transmission?</TD></TR></TABLE>

I agree with this. I put an A6 in my civic and used a DX tranny and expected to get better MPG in the A6/dx tranny civic than I do in my a6/si tranny crx but I actually get about 5mpg better in the crx.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 04:45 PM
  #10  
StorminMatt's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,303
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA, USA
Default Re: which tranny would be best (george34)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by george34 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I agree with this. I put an A6 in my civic and used a DX tranny and expected to get better MPG in the A6/dx tranny civic than I do in my a6/si tranny crx but I actually get about 5mpg better in the crx.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I should also note that when I did the HF transmission swap, I was replacing an SI transmission in the DX HB - NOT a DX transmission. So you would think that this would have REALLY helped with mileage. But it didn't.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 04:45 PM
  #11  
ludesrv's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 3
From: Kitchener, On, Canada
Default Re: which tranny would be best (george34)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by george34 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I agree with this. I put an A6 in my civic and used a DX tranny and expected to get better MPG in the A6/dx tranny civic than I do in my a6/si tranny crx but I actually get about 5mpg better in the crx.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I got 650km for 45 liters with an Si tranny. I got the same with a dx tranny. I guess it's all in how you drive it.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2007 | 05:30 PM
  #12  
StorminMatt's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,303
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA, USA
Default Re: which tranny would be best (ludesrv)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ludesrv &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I got 650km for 45 liters with an Si tranny. I got the same with a dx tranny. I guess it's all in how you drive it.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Perhaps you also have to realize that you can't expect a Honda engine to respond the same way to gearing changes as a low-revving American V8 does. And most tidbits of automotive knowledge (ie shorter gearing = MUCH worse gas mileage) come from the first-hand experiences of old-school gearheads.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1990hondaHF
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
Oct 20, 2007 01:32 PM
D-Atk
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
10
Jun 14, 2005 08:59 PM
Project_ED8
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
19
Sep 18, 2003 06:32 PM
Civic-Stiz
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
1
May 26, 2002 10:04 PM
rasta420
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
8
Apr 2, 2002 04:35 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:45 AM.