Engine runs colder the more you drive?
Thread Starter
* B A N N E D *
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: thornton, co, usa
Engine runs colder the more you drive?
Sounds ridiculous to most people, but me and a few friends (chemical engineers) in the high altitudes of Denver have always had problems with detonation & power loss due to the dry, oxygen-stripped climate. We decided it's time for a solution that could benefit ALL motorists.
We're currently producing 5 prototype systems for the B18C1 and C5 (on a very low budget) for both FI and NA engines, that we will provide do-it-yourself instructions, or pre-fabricated kits for those with less patience or resources.
Anyway I'm sure you want details. Wthout spilling the beans just yet, here's some information:
- Reduces intake temperatures by an average of 80-100F
- Allows NA compression ratios up to 14:1 and FI piston compression ratios up to 11:1 without detonation (assuming your bottom end can handle it, & you have access to race fuel) throughout the ENTIRE powerband.
- Up to TWICE as clean & thorough fuel burning dramatically increases combustion efficiency in all applications; improves emissions, power results, & reduces carbon build-up.
- Engine & coolant temperatures actually DECLINED while driving on a street-built motor.
- Minimal or no maintenance costs, & is not restricted for track use.
- Bolt-on components; takes about 3 hours to install + dyno time
- Lightweight; no more than a 1-lb max weight gains
- Our B18C5 is NA at 278 horsepower from 4500-7900 RPM, & 234 ft-lb output with these prototypes; we're still working out the kinks & getting patents.
But at this time, all I need is a catchy business name. If I use your submission I'll gladly give you the first full production kit of your choice at no cost. I'm an honest person, & I have no problem compensating someone for their assistance.
Thanks
We're currently producing 5 prototype systems for the B18C1 and C5 (on a very low budget) for both FI and NA engines, that we will provide do-it-yourself instructions, or pre-fabricated kits for those with less patience or resources.
Anyway I'm sure you want details. Wthout spilling the beans just yet, here's some information:
- Reduces intake temperatures by an average of 80-100F
- Allows NA compression ratios up to 14:1 and FI piston compression ratios up to 11:1 without detonation (assuming your bottom end can handle it, & you have access to race fuel) throughout the ENTIRE powerband.
- Up to TWICE as clean & thorough fuel burning dramatically increases combustion efficiency in all applications; improves emissions, power results, & reduces carbon build-up.
- Engine & coolant temperatures actually DECLINED while driving on a street-built motor.
- Minimal or no maintenance costs, & is not restricted for track use.
- Bolt-on components; takes about 3 hours to install + dyno time
- Lightweight; no more than a 1-lb max weight gains
- Our B18C5 is NA at 278 horsepower from 4500-7900 RPM, & 234 ft-lb output with these prototypes; we're still working out the kinks & getting patents.
But at this time, all I need is a catchy business name. If I use your submission I'll gladly give you the first full production kit of your choice at no cost. I'm an honest person, & I have no problem compensating someone for their assistance.
Thanks
Daisy... Daisy...
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,580
Likes: 4
From: 24601
Re: Engine runs colder the more you drive? (nonsoundflux)
I have a PhD in Chemical Engineering. Let me guess, water injection?!?!?!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nonsoundflux »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">- Our B18C5 is NA at 278 horsepower from 4500-7900 RPM, & 234 ft-lb output with these prototypes; we're still working out the kinks & getting patents.</TD></TR></TABLE>
You're claiming over a 78% increase in engine torque (assuming your number is flywheel torque) on a NA engine. To do so you need to introduce greater amounts of fuel energy and an associated oxidizer. You also state that HP is constant from 4500-7900 RPM.
Best of luck to you and the laws of thermodynamics. This thread is locked, but feel free to send me an IM with the dyno plot.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nonsoundflux »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">- Our B18C5 is NA at 278 horsepower from 4500-7900 RPM, & 234 ft-lb output with these prototypes; we're still working out the kinks & getting patents.</TD></TR></TABLE>
You're claiming over a 78% increase in engine torque (assuming your number is flywheel torque) on a NA engine. To do so you need to introduce greater amounts of fuel energy and an associated oxidizer. You also state that HP is constant from 4500-7900 RPM.
Best of luck to you and the laws of thermodynamics. This thread is locked, but feel free to send me an IM with the dyno plot.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fredtoast
Tech / Misc
5
Sep 9, 2005 11:51 AM