skunk2 pro cams + supertech valve springs ???
hey guys i just received my skunk2 pro cams and i just wondering if i could use my current supertech dual valve springs to go with these cams, will the supertech valve springs be stiff enough for them ??
tony1 ?? skunk2 tony ?? mike laskey ??
thanks guys !!!
tony1 ?? skunk2 tony ?? mike laskey ??
thanks guys !!!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mtber »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Skunk2 will recommend the pro series valvesprings with their retainers.</TD></TR></TABLE> yup, as said on there site and manuals
of course they will recommend their own products. i don't think the OP mentioned using s2 retainers though.
after hearing about retainer failures on here, it makes one weary.
after hearing about retainer failures on here, it makes one weary.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kyden »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">of course they will recommend their own products. i don't think the OP mentioned using s2 retainers though.
after hearing about retainer failures on here, it makes one weary.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Skunk2 retainer failures ?
What threads ?
after hearing about retainer failures on here, it makes one weary.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Skunk2 retainer failures ?
What threads ?
the skunk2 retainers do chip around the edges. and youll want to run the pro springs not the tuner line. I havent been able to find the supertech spring rates online.
The valve springs for larger street cams generally need to be softer at seated pressure since as the large lobe of the cam compresses the spring the pressure will increase.
if you are running stiff springs with these cams it will chew up the rocker arms and cam lobes because of the high lift lobes both in and out of vtec. the non vtec lobes are very large and stiff springs will chew them up.
Modified by D@nnY at 9:33 AM 11/19/2007
The valve springs for larger street cams generally need to be softer at seated pressure since as the large lobe of the cam compresses the spring the pressure will increase.
if you are running stiff springs with these cams it will chew up the rocker arms and cam lobes because of the high lift lobes both in and out of vtec. the non vtec lobes are very large and stiff springs will chew them up.
Modified by D@nnY at 9:33 AM 11/19/2007
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by D@nnY »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the skunk2 retainers do chip around the edges. and youll want to run the pro springs not the tuner line. I havent been able to find the supertech spring rates online.
The valve springs for larger cams generally need to be softer at seated pressure since as the large lobe of the cam compresses the spring the pressure will increase.
if you are running stiff springs with these cams it will chew up the rocker arms and cam lobes because of the high lift lobes both in and out of vtec. the non vtec lobes are very large and stiff springs will chew them up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
awesome tip d@nny, something i will keep in mind.
The valve springs for larger cams generally need to be softer at seated pressure since as the large lobe of the cam compresses the spring the pressure will increase.
if you are running stiff springs with these cams it will chew up the rocker arms and cam lobes because of the high lift lobes both in and out of vtec. the non vtec lobes are very large and stiff springs will chew them up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
awesome tip d@nny, something i will keep in mind.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by D@nnY »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the skunk2 retainers do chip around the edges. and youll want to run the pro springs not the tuner line. I havent been able to find the supertech spring rates online.
The valve springs for larger cams generally need to be softer at seated pressure since as the large lobe of the cam compresses the spring the pressure will increase.
if you are running stiff springs with these cams it will chew up the rocker arms and cam lobes because of the high lift lobes both in and out of vtec. the non vtec lobes are very large and stiff springs will chew them up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Have you seen this in person with the newer gen pro series retainers ?
I have not.
The valve springs for larger cams generally need to be softer at seated pressure since as the large lobe of the cam compresses the spring the pressure will increase.
if you are running stiff springs with these cams it will chew up the rocker arms and cam lobes because of the high lift lobes both in and out of vtec. the non vtec lobes are very large and stiff springs will chew them up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Have you seen this in person with the newer gen pro series retainers ?
I have not.
I cant say if they fixed the problem or not. I havent seen it in the new ones. but people need to do the research on what spring rates they have before switching cams.
I had a bad experience with rev valvetrain recently. It turns out rev released a valvespring for b series motors that can only be used on cams under 11mm lift and you need to run rev flat seat locators as well.
which to me is stupid because you cant even run them with type r cams. the spring rates are way to stiff and they coil bind at 11mm lift. with type r cams being 11.5 mm lift I had issues and it screwed up my cams and rocker arms. and the rev valves mushroomed out at the tips.
I had a bad experience with rev valvetrain recently. It turns out rev released a valvespring for b series motors that can only be used on cams under 11mm lift and you need to run rev flat seat locators as well.
which to me is stupid because you cant even run them with type r cams. the spring rates are way to stiff and they coil bind at 11mm lift. with type r cams being 11.5 mm lift I had issues and it screwed up my cams and rocker arms. and the rev valves mushroomed out at the tips.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Cyber ITR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hey guys i just received my skunk2 pro cams and i just wondering if i could use my current supertech dual valve springs to go with these cams, will the supertech valve springs be stiff enough for them ??
tony1 ?? skunk2 tony ?? mike laskey ??
thanks guys !!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
http://www.supertechperformance.com according to the specs here there are 2 different springs . both seem to work....
tony1 ?? skunk2 tony ?? mike laskey ??
thanks guys !!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
http://www.supertechperformance.com according to the specs here there are 2 different springs . both seem to work....
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sp00led »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Good deal, i have supertech valvetrain and i'm going to try out some skunk2 pro2 cams</TD></TR></TABLE>
supertech stuff is 70lbs or 85 lbs seated depending on which one you have. which means its stiffer then what skunk made for the cams.....you may have valvetrain wear problems
supertech stuff is 70lbs or 85 lbs seated depending on which one you have. which means its stiffer then what skunk made for the cams.....you may have valvetrain wear problems
some info
Skunk2 Pro -B series Vtec- 311-05-5350
60lbs seated at 1.320 or 33.5mm
210 lbs @ .820 " - 20.828mm
bind @ .720 " 18.288mm
Skunk2 tuner springs- B series vtec 311-05-0350
50 lbs @1.320 seated at 33.5mm
210lbs @.820 20.828mm
bind .800 20.32mm
Supertech spr- H1002d
70lbs @ 33.5mm or 1.320"
190 lbs at 12mm lift
max lift 14mm or .551 inch
coilbind -19.5mm or .767 inch
Supertech SPR h100 DR
85 lbs @ 33.5 seated
266 @ 14mm open .551 inch
15mm max lift .590 inch
18.5 mm coil bind
REV- UR8101s
80lbs seated at 34mm
195 @ 10mm
coil bind 19mm
max net lift 12.5 mm
REV UR 8110S
70lbs @ 34 mm lift
170 @ 10 mm
coil bind 19mm
max net lift 13.5 mm
Modified by D@nnY at 11:13 AM 11/20/2007
Modified by D@nnY at 11:16 AM 11/20/2007
Modified by D@nnY at 2:31 PM 11/20/2007
Skunk2 Pro -B series Vtec- 311-05-5350
60lbs seated at 1.320 or 33.5mm
210 lbs @ .820 " - 20.828mm
bind @ .720 " 18.288mm
Skunk2 tuner springs- B series vtec 311-05-0350
50 lbs @1.320 seated at 33.5mm
210lbs @.820 20.828mm
bind .800 20.32mm
Supertech spr- H1002d
70lbs @ 33.5mm or 1.320"
190 lbs at 12mm lift
max lift 14mm or .551 inch
coilbind -19.5mm or .767 inch
Supertech SPR h100 DR
85 lbs @ 33.5 seated
266 @ 14mm open .551 inch
15mm max lift .590 inch
18.5 mm coil bind
REV- UR8101s
80lbs seated at 34mm
195 @ 10mm
coil bind 19mm
max net lift 12.5 mm
REV UR 8110S
70lbs @ 34 mm lift
170 @ 10 mm
coil bind 19mm
max net lift 13.5 mm
Modified by D@nnY at 11:13 AM 11/20/2007
Modified by D@nnY at 11:16 AM 11/20/2007
Modified by D@nnY at 2:31 PM 11/20/2007
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">60lbs of seat pressure at 1.320"
210lbs of open pressure at .820"
Coil bind at .720"
And we have them in stock
</TD></TR></TABLE>
arent those alot softer then the rev and supertech stuff?
210lbs of open pressure at .820"
Coil bind at .720"
And we have them in stock
</TD></TR></TABLE>arent those alot softer then the rev and supertech stuff?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by D@nnY »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
supertech stuff is 70lbs or 85 lbs seated depending on which one you have. which means its stiffer then what skunk made for the cams.....you may have valvetrain wear problems</TD></TR></TABLE>
Do you think the wear is going to be worse on the pro1s or the pro2s. I'm assuming the more agressive cam will be harder on the valvetrain. I might just hold off on teh pro2 and try the pro1s to be safe. I'm also looking at another thread questioning the pro2s if you have +1mm valves. V2V clearances might be an issue.
supertech stuff is 70lbs or 85 lbs seated depending on which one you have. which means its stiffer then what skunk made for the cams.....you may have valvetrain wear problems</TD></TR></TABLE>
Do you think the wear is going to be worse on the pro1s or the pro2s. I'm assuming the more agressive cam will be harder on the valvetrain. I might just hold off on teh pro2 and try the pro1s to be safe. I'm also looking at another thread questioning the pro2s if you have +1mm valves. V2V clearances might be an issue.
pro 2s have more lift so the spring pressure will go up as the spring compresses. it will wear more. look at how much softer the skunk springs are then the supertech or rev.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">60lbs of seat pressure at 1.320"
210lbs of open pressure at .820"
Coil bind at .720"
And we have them in stock
</TD></TR></TABLE>
So running these Tony...
Supertech SPR h100 DR
85 lbs @ 33.5 seated
266 @ 14mm open .551 inch
15mm max lift .590 inch
18.5 mm coil bind
...would one need to worry about wear on a set of PRO1 Cams?
I was recommended to go with the heavy Supertech springs today by a head porting facility and now it looks like that was the wrong recommendation?
210lbs of open pressure at .820"
Coil bind at .720"
And we have them in stock
</TD></TR></TABLE>So running these Tony...
Supertech SPR h100 DR
85 lbs @ 33.5 seated
266 @ 14mm open .551 inch
15mm max lift .590 inch
18.5 mm coil bind
...would one need to worry about wear on a set of PRO1 Cams?
I was recommended to go with the heavy Supertech springs today by a head porting facility and now it looks like that was the wrong recommendation?



