Honda Accord (1990 - 2002) Includes 1997 - 1999 Acura CL

fidanza flywheel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 10:00 PM
  #1  
2kdrift's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 9
From: Florida, usa
Default fidanza flywheel

any accord owners using a lightened flywheel?? i just ordered a 9lb fidanza flywheel with my new clutch. how do you like the lightened flywheel? any drawbacks?


and post what engine you got, mine if for the f22b2
accords only please
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 10:31 AM
  #2  
NeKe1point0's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default Re: fidanza flywheel (camdizawg)

excellent especially if u eventually go boosted ! ! i installed mine over a yr ago now and highly reccomend fidanza - no issues so far !

Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 11:33 AM
  #3  
BrianAo34's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 80
Likes: 1
From: Montgomery, AL, USA
Default

most people would agree that lightened flywheel is not such a good idea to get a lightened flywheel with boost. mostly useful for allmotor applications. the extra inertia of the heavier flywheel is better for n/a applications from what i hear...
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #4  
awdgsx96's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
From: NJ -> Outside Denver
Default Re: (BrianAo34)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BrianAo34 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">most people would agree that lightened flywheel is not such a good idea to get a lightened flywheel with boost. mostly useful for allmotor applications. the extra inertia of the heavier flywheel is better for n/a applications from what i hear...</TD></TR></TABLE>

I think it is the other way around. Less rotational mass keeps it spinning faster between shifts to stay "higher" in the power band. A lightened flywheel might be better for boost, again because it keeps RPMs a touch higher, giving better spool
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 05:49 PM
  #5  
TheMuffinMan's Avatar
He knows where you live!
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,566
Likes: 8
Default

&lt;-- has lightened flywheel on h22 and it's bad ***
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 05:55 PM
  #6  
awdgsx96's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
From: NJ -> Outside Denver
Default Re: (TheMuffinMan)

You should have done a write up for your swap

How much of a difference would you say it is on the butt dyno? I rode in my friend's JDM B16 with a stock wheel than lightened Fidanza and there wasn't a super difference. B16s are also the torqueless monsters too though so.....
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 06:16 PM
  #7  
oem_certified_accord's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
From: Driving Slow, Through Your City
Default Re: (awdgsx96)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TheMuffinMan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">&lt;-- has lightened flywheel on h22 and it's bad ***</TD></TR></TABLE>

what? you already swapped? pics please.

i'm doin the fidanza flywheel + act clutch on my upcoming swap.. i expect good results.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 06:23 PM
  #8  
SiR-T's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Cayman Islands
Default Re: (oem_certified_accord)

i have a boosted f20b with a 9lb fidanza flwheel and ACT clutch...and let me tell u, the flywheel makes so much of a difference its not even funny. u can immediately see and feel how quick the motor revs, even wen i had the motor N/A, it still made a big difference deffinately go for it bro
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 06:38 PM
  #9  
TheMuffinMan's Avatar
He knows where you live!
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,566
Likes: 8
Default Re: (oem_certified_accord)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by oem_certified_accord &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

what? you already swapped? pics please.

i'm doin the fidanza flywheel + act clutch on my upcoming swap.. i expect good results.</TD></TR></TABLE>

just got her back this afternoon

pics tomorrow from a friend (he has a nice camera + tripod)
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 06:56 PM
  #10  
oem_certified_accord's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
From: Driving Slow, Through Your City
Default Re: (TheMuffinMan)

word, i expect a thread homeboy.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 07:11 PM
  #11  
NeKe1point0's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default Re: (BrianAo34)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BrianAo34 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">most people would agree that lightened flywheel is not such a good idea to get a lightened flywheel with boost. mostly useful for allmotor applications. the extra inertia of the heavier flywheel is better for n/a applications from what i hear...</TD></TR></TABLE>

^^^I hope you were joking ... this is definitly wrong !

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by awdgsx96 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I think it is the other way around. Less rotational mass keeps it spinning faster between shifts to stay "higher" in the power band. A lightened flywheel might be better for boost, again because it keeps RPMs a touch higher, giving better spool</TD></TR></TABLE>

This is correct ^^^

For one to build boost requires higher RPMs. The faster you can get up the RPM's, the faster you are hitting full boost. A lot of boosted setups run a lightend flywheel, and yes there is a night and day difference.

Just get a nice clutch and get the flywheel and you'll defintly enjoy the new feel of your car. I installed my Fidanza w/ a Clutchmasters Stage 3 clutch, and like i said in my prev post. No problems and over a year worth of abuse.

Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 07:16 PM
  #12  
TheMuffinMan's Avatar
He knows where you live!
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,566
Likes: 8
Default Re: (oem_certified_accord)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by oem_certified_accord &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">word, i expect a thread homeboy.</TD></TR></TABLE>


you best believe there will be one

i gotta work out a few kinks

1) i believe is related to coolant (surging idle)
2) gotta get a ps bracket
3) picking up a vafc this weekend most likely
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 07:40 PM
  #13  
gianinline's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 5
From: Pompano Beach, FL, USA
Default Re: (NeKe1point0)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NeKe1point0 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I installed my Fidanza w/ a Clutchmasters Stage 3 clutch, and like i said in my prev post. No problems and over a year worth of abuse.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

My old setuf was f22b1 with the same as neke1point0 (6 puck ceramic clutch), and it was very nice, quicker revs, car seemed much lighter, better response.... i was very pleased with them!
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 11:37 AM
  #14  
pos_cd5's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR, USA
Default Re: (awdgsx96)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by awdgsx96 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I think it is the other way around. Less rotational mass keeps it spinning faster between shifts to stay "higher" in the power band. A lightened flywheel might be better for boost, again because it keeps RPMs a touch higher, giving better spool</TD></TR></TABLE>

wrong! less mass allows it to rev up quicker, but it also allows it to drop revs a whole lot faster (for example, like while in neutral between shifts). thats one of the reasons flywheels weight as much as they do, the rotational inertia keeps the crank spinning between power strokes. theres are pros and cons with getting a lightweight flywheel, go too light and you may have shitty idling, weird shifts due to revs dropping way too quickly (aka you cant shift fast enough). a light flywheel is also desirable to more experianced drivers for another reason, because it makes it alot easier to rev match, bliping the throttle becomes alot more responsive, and they dont have to wait as long to let the revs drop to where they want it before engaging the clutch.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 11:46 AM
  #15  
pos_cd5's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR, USA
Default Re: (NeKe1point0)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NeKe1point0 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


For one to build boost requires higher RPMs. The faster you can get up the RPM's, the faster you are hitting full boost. A lot of boosted setups run a lightend flywheel, and yes there is a night and day difference.

Just get a nice clutch and get the flywheel and you'll defintly enjoy the new feel of your car. I installed my Fidanza w/ a Clutchmasters Stage 3 clutch, and like i said in my prev post. No problems and over a year worth of abuse.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

actually, no...engine load (or more correctly, thermal expansion) is what spools a turbo, not engine RPMs or exhuast velocity.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #16  
gianinline's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 5
From: Pompano Beach, FL, USA
Default

Danm boy.... pos_cd5.. nicely said!
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #17  
CD5 Jeebies!'s Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 1
From: Free bullets if you find me sucka, Washington
Default Re: (gianinline)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gianinline &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Danm boy.... pos_cd5.. nicely said!</TD></TR></TABLE>

ditto....Pos you been reading up havent you

not hign wrong with a lightend flywheel..the only problem I've heard is of some of the no name chepo brands breaking
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 05:30 PM
  #18  
GhostAccord's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,399
Likes: 69
From: East Coast 506, Canada
Default Re: (pos_cd5)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by pos_cd5 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">(or more correctly, thermal expansion) is what spools a turbo, not engine RPMs or exhuast velocity.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Nice! Thermal expansion lol


Modified by GhostAccord at 10:45 PM 10/10/2007
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 09:25 PM
  #19  
pos_cd5's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR, USA
Default Re: (I got the CD5 Jeebies!)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by I got the CD5 Jeebies! &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

ditto....Pos you been reading up havent you
</TD></TR></TABLE>

learning FTW!
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 11:18 AM
  #20  
awdgsx96's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
From: NJ -> Outside Denver
Default Re: (pos_cd5)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by pos_cd5 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

actually, no...engine load (or more correctly, thermal expansion) is what spools a turbo, not engine RPMs or exhuast velocity.</TD></TR></TABLE>

How does exhaust velocity have nothing to do with it? I agree with you 100% about the engine load, but as RPM's go up, exhaust temperature/movement usually does as well; to an extent. I'm [I]pretty[I] sure that is what I read about thermal wrapped or coated manifolds, downpipes, and turbines - the increased temperature led to better spool characteristics.

Turbos are too confusing
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 08:46 AM
  #21  
dxtosirex's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: EMO Valley, Il, usa
Default Re: (awdgsx96)

N/A F22 F1 11.5lb flywheel Exedy clutch DX trans. 3rd gear's quicker.
Awesome Acce. The only prob with the cheap flywheel is that I cant drop the clutch from a stand still past 4k rpm...It just wont catch. Full throttle shifts tho
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2007 | 06:29 AM
  #22  
Tyte-S's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
From: Raritan
Default Re: (dxtosirex)

I bought the stage 3 6 puck clutch and flywheel set up for my f23 before it got flooded out, you guys are really making me wish i had got it in.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
immalooser
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
1
Oct 18, 2005 08:08 PM
AFAccord
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
20
Aug 10, 2005 11:07 AM
b16a27
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
1
Nov 5, 2004 04:43 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:55 AM.