All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

si vs gsr head

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #1  
hisproduct's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: dirty jerz, nj, burlington
Default si vs gsr head

85mm block 95mm stroke....11:5:1 comp pistons....which would be more productive....this setup with a b16 head or a gsr head
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #2  
cartune network's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, middlesex
Default Re: si vs gsr head (hisproduct)

the gsr head has a smaller combustion chamber which will bump your compression ratio up.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 12:48 PM
  #3  
b20beast978's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
From: Eastern, Ma, USA
Default

the smaller cc on the gsr head will bump your CR .3...other than that the only diffrence is the selection of intake manifolds
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 01:01 PM
  #4  
Kevlar1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: Marlyand
Default Re: (b20beast978)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hisproduct &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">85mm block 95mm stroke....11:5:1 comp pistons....which would be more productive....this setup with a b16 head or a gsr head</TD></TR></TABLE>

95mm stoke huh? thats pretty big..

it depends on your setup.. there is not right or wrong, I would say gsr..
it flows more anyway..

and to who those who wanna say im wrong put it on a flowbench. then you will see
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #5  
Combustion Contraption's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
Default Re: (bthereforyou18)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bthereforyou18 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
and to who those who wanna say im wrong put it on a flowbench. then you will see</TD></TR></TABLE>

I have. The difference is neglible, at best. Theres more to cylinder head potential than raw CFM flow numbers.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 01:23 PM
  #6  
gibsanez's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
From: NB, Canada
Default Re: (Combustion Contraption)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Combustion Contraption &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I have. The difference is neglible, at best. Theres more to cylinder head potential than raw CFM flow numbers.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Fank you. If you're thinking about doing ANY headwork at all, any minuscule difference between the two will be eliminated anyways. In one of the last honda-tuning issues, the one with the 150 hp/L build, Larry Widmer of Endyn even admitted that he changes his mind on which head he likes better more often than he changes his socks.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 01:34 PM
  #7  
Kevlar1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: Marlyand
Default Re: (gibsanez)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Combustion Contraption &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I have. The difference is neglible, at best. Theres more to cylinder head potential than raw CFM flow numbers.</TD></TR></TABLE>

exactly, but to many many people on H-T they think the si head flows more but really it doesn't.. I was just making the point

to the OP: search there is plenty of **** on this subject
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 01:39 PM
  #8  
HAMOTORSPORTS's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,314
Likes: 2
From: Big Sky Country, United States of America
Default Re: (bthereforyou18)

If you have both heads to choose from in the same condition and any manifold, I would say gsr as I feel it has a slight advantage on the port shape for low r/s engines. As every one else stated though: It is a miniscule difference
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #9  
kpowerdhatch's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
Default

If you plan on porting the head which I would hope you'll do considering 85x95, I'd go B16 just because of you selection of intake manifolds.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 03:26 PM
  #10  
cartune network's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, middlesex
Default Re: (kpowerdhatch)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kpowerdhatch &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If you plan on porting the head which I would hope you'll do considering 85x95, I'd go B16 just because of you selection of intake manifolds. </TD></TR></TABLE>

i couldnt agree with that more.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 03:45 PM
  #11  
Rocket's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,765
Likes: 1
Default Re: (cartune network)

B16 is better with ______________ and P72 is better with _____________.

Insert top secret Honda engine builder knowledge above.

Cosworht Engineering

No PM's re this please unless you are willing to cough up some serious dough.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 03:49 PM
  #12  
Combustion Contraption's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
Default Re: (Master of the Universe)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Master of the Universe &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">B16 is better with <FONT COLOR="red">sharp inlet dividers</FONT> and P72 is better with <FONT COLOR="red">variable flow bench room ceiling height</FONT>. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 03:55 PM
  #13  
mar778c's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,128
Likes: 3
From: Near Philly, USA
Default Re: (Master of the Universe)

This question is bogus. Why would you go thru the expensive of a 95 mm build and use a stock head?

If you are building the head up it still does not matter.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 04:09 PM
  #14  
Rocket's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,765
Likes: 1
Default Re: (mar778c)

Contrapted Combustion
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 04:18 PM
  #15  
Rocket's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,765
Likes: 1
Default Re: (mar778c)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mar778c &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">This question is bogus. Why would you go thru the expensive of a 95 mm build and use a stock head?

If you are building the head up it still does not matter.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yeah seems pretty hypothetical.

In an "ideal" world I would be able to guess the next winning Mega Lotto numbers and then buy a couple CNC machines and buy some K motors and trick those out to 600+bhp NA and then fly DonF out here to build them and then give one of them away to a worthy H-T All Motor member, preferably one that is "open minded" and does need a big name brand.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 04:53 PM
  #16  
( o )( o )'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: 209, USA
Default Re: (Master of the Universe)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Master of the Universe &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

In an "ideal" world I would be able to guess the next winning Mega Lotto numbers and then buy a couple CNC machines and buy some K motors and trick those out to 600+bhp NA and then fly DonF out here to build them and then give one of them away to a worthy H-T All Motor member, preferably one that is "open minded" and does need a big name brand. </TD></TR></TABLE>

LOL
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 08:00 PM
  #17  
hisproduct's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: dirty jerz, nj, burlington
Default Re: si vs gsr head (hisproduct)

thanx alot for all the help guys
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 08:45 PM
  #18  
smileycvc's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
From: Around, Seattle
Default Re: si vs gsr head (hisproduct)

I was under the impression that the GSR head didnt begin to surpass the B16 flow until some rediculous amount lift.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 11:39 PM
  #19  
ToeJam's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: usa
Default Re: si vs gsr head (smileycvc)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by smileycvc &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I was under the impression that the GSR head didnt begin to surpass the B16 flow until some rediculous amount lift.</TD></TR></TABLE>

gsr for the the quench pads and LMA's.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 05:23 AM
  #20  
Natural Aspirations's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,957
Likes: 0
From: nothing is real unless it is observed
Default Re: si vs gsr head (ToeJam)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ToeJam &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

gsr for the the quench pads and LMA's.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

B16's got the LMA update the same time the GSR's did
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dcforgod
Acura Integra
9
May 14, 2008 05:07 AM
fliptout
Acura Integra
12
Apr 4, 2007 07:39 PM
cars101
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
11
May 3, 2006 04:56 PM
racingfan
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
13
Sep 6, 2005 02:09 AM
sleepin91teg
Acura Integra
6
Dec 14, 2003 12:54 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:49 PM.